Page 1 of 1

I didn't need stats to tell me you people are dumbfucks

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:34 pm
by Dinsdale
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp ... 1003571876

NEW YORK A new survey of 1,502 adults released Sunday by Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found that despite the mass appeal of the Internet and cable news since a previous poll in 1989, Americans' knowledge of national affairs has slipped a little. For example, only 69% know that Dick Cheney is vice president, while 74% could identify Dan Quayle in that post in 1989.

Other details are equally eye-opening. Pew judged the levels of knowledgeability (correct answers) among those surveyed and found that those who scored the highest were regular watchers of Comedy Central's The Daily Show and Colbert Report. They tied with regular readers of major newspapers in the top spot -- with 54% of them getting 2 out of 3 questions correct. Watchers of the Lehrer News Hour on PBS followed just behind.

Virtually bringing up the rear were regular watchers of Fox News. Only 1 in 3 could answer 2 out of 3 questions correctly. Fox topped only network morning show viewers.

Told that Shia was one group of Muslims struggling in Iraq, only 32% of the total sample could name "Sunni" as the other key group.

The percentage of those who knew their state's governor dropped to 2 in 3. Almost half know that Rep. Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House and 2 in 3 know that Condi Rice is secretary of state. But just 29% can identify Scooter Libby, 21% know Robert Gates and 15% can name Sen. Harry Reid.

But nearly 9 in 10 knew about President Bush's troop escalation in Iraq.

Men scored higher than women, and older Americans did better than younger, on average. Democrats and Republicans were about equally represented in the most knowledgeable group but there were more Republicans in the least aware group.


Some actually needed a study to verify the bolded part?

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:35 pm
by Bizzarofelice
The test was biased. Of course GOP fans are going to miss questions like "Is Ronald Reagan a mortal, or a god?"

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:40 pm
by Y2K
A good question would have been

"Have you ever heard of editorandpublisher.com?"

O/U at 1%

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:41 pm
by indyfrisco
Y2K wrote:O/U at 1%
But what's the O/E on this?

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:43 pm
by Y2K
IndyFrisco wrote:
Y2K wrote:O/U at 1%
But what's the O/E on this?
We'll have to consult Q Braindead Style on that one.

BTW- Out of da sauce... PM forthcoming...

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:01 pm
by Cuda
Who were they surveying, college students?

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:02 pm
by BSmack
Cuda wrote:Who were they surveying, college students?
My guess is unemployed Floridians.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:05 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
BSmack wrote:
Cuda wrote:Who were they surveying, college students?
My guess is unemployed Floridians.
Actually, Wolfman's retired, but close enough.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:23 pm
by Q, West Coast Style
IndyFrisco wrote:
Y2K wrote:O/U at 1%
But what's the O/E on this?
Yeah you're pretty proud of that one, aren't ya?

Is that where this board has ended up? Posters hanging their hats on typo smack?

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:26 pm
by Tom In VA
Q, West Coast Style wrote:Posters hanging their hats on typo smack?
Hanging of hats occurs on dangling participles.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:28 pm
by Dinsdale
Tom In VA wrote: Hanging of hats occurs on dangling participles.
I laughed. Or close to, anyway.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:28 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
You did it three times, dude. You're really calling that a "typo?" How did you manage to make the exact same "typo" three times in a row? Not to mention a quick scan of the keyboard indicates the E isn't even all that close to the U. You must have fingers the size of fists (save your Festivus Party emails clones).

Hey, I don't give a shit what you typed...but calling it a typo? BLASPHEMY.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:32 pm
by indyfrisco
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Hey, I don't give a shit what you typed...but calling it a typo? BLASPHEMY.
That must have been a typo too.

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:56 pm
by Mister Bushice
Q, West Coast Style wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote:
Y2K wrote:O/U at 1%
But what's the O/E on this?
Is that where this board has ended up? Posters hanging their hats on typo smack?
Noe. Of course not.

Be proud.

This one might achieve dumpater status.

I wonder what the O/E on that might be?