Page 1 of 1
Draft history ranking by school
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:50 am
by King Crimson
kinda interesting. FWIW. the NFL is something i watch when i want to hang with some of my Donkey buddies. but, sort of interesting.
i didn't think Oklahoma would rank that high given that 20 years of their best "skill" and OL players were wishbone/option oriented. but, i guess the "League" needs pulling guard who can knock a downfield LB on his ass after all.
http://www.drafthistory.com/n_college/college_n.html
Re: Draft history ranking by school
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 7:24 am
by Husker4ever
King Crimson wrote:kinda interesting. FWIW. the NFL is something i watch when i want to hang with some of my Donkey buddies. but, sort of interesting.
i didn't think Oklahoma would rank that high given that 20 years of their best "skill" and OL players were wishbone/option oriented. but, i guess the "League" needs pulling guard who can knock a downfield LB on his ass after all.
http://www.drafthistory.com/n_college/college_n.html
I've always been amazed at how many OL came out of Nebraska's run-oriented offense and went on to perform well in the NFL.
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 1:23 pm
by Shoalzie
Kind of funny that State is so high up. They've had NFL-ready talent but their teams have been mediocre at best.
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 1:29 pm
by the_ouskull
Like a lot of Pac-10 teams...
the_ouskull
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 2:58 am
by L45B
I didn't see it on that link, but after the '07 draft tOSU passed up USC for the school with the most first round picks.
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 6:56 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
L45B wrote:I didn't see it on that link, but after the '07 draft tOSU passed up USC for the school with the most first round picks.
I'm curious to know the stats displaying the schools with the highest paid players
entering the NFL draft.
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 2:06 am
by L45B
I dunno, but I'm almost certain Iowa doesn't even make that list.
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:00 am
by Laxplayer
'm curious to know the stats displaying the schools with the highest paid players entering the NFL draft.
I often wonder why kids from $C leave early because they have to be making a hell of a lot more while still in college.
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:04 pm
by buckeye_in_sc
Iowa not on the list.
I call BULLSHIT!
Sin,
Jonsense...
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:25 pm
by PSUFAN
Interesting link. PSU had a few years with 10 guys drafted. That's a bunch.
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:16 pm
by indyfrisco
Florida State 213
Iowa 213
Baylor 208
California 199
North Carolina 197
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 4:31 pm
by Mr T
IndyFrisco wrote:Florida State 213
Draft started in 1936. FSU didnt have D1 football til 1950.
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 6:10 pm
by indyfrisco
Mr T wrote:IndyFrisco wrote:Florida State 213
Draft started in 1936. FSU didnt have D1 football til 1950.
I was pointing out that Kal was behind Baylor. Did the UBB code fly over yer head? Who gave nolesy T's password?
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 4:06 am
by Mr T
IndyFrisco wrote:Mr T wrote:IndyFrisco wrote:Florida State 213
Draft started in 1936. FSU didnt have D1 football til 1950.
I was pointing out that Kal was behind Baylor. Did the UBB code fly over yer head? Who gave nolesy T's password?
Just got defensive. You know you never want to be tied with iowa in anything.
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 12:15 pm
by buckeye_in_sc
Rack the Iowa blast...
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 3:15 pm
by King Crimson
kinda surprised Bama is so low.
and on the FSU issue. do the numbers, while FSU is a factory....they would need to have averaged about 7 per year they weren't playing D-1 ball to make the top 5. just goes to show (nothing against FSU) what the consistent quality of the top programs over teh last 50 years.
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:15 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
King Crimson wrote:kinda surprised Bama is so low.
and on the FSU issue. do the numbers, while FSU is a factory....they would need to have averaged about 7 per year they weren't playing D-1 ball to make the top 5. just goes to show (nothing against FSU) what the consistent quality of the top programs over teh last 50 years.
In fairness on this point, the NFL draft has been shortened dramatically over the years. At one point within the time that I was conscious of these sorts of things, the NFL draft was 18 rounds long. Expansion and supplemental draft picks have mitigated the effects of shortening of the draft somewhat, but there were still a lot more players drafted in the 1970's than there are today.
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:21 pm
by King Crimson
that's a good point TinC. taken.
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 8:06 pm
by Mr T
Terry in Crapchester wrote:King Crimson wrote:kinda surprised Bama is so low.
and on the FSU issue. do the numbers, while FSU is a factory....they would need to have averaged about 7 per year they weren't playing D-1 ball to make the top 5. just goes to show (nothing against FSU) what the consistent quality of the top programs over teh last 50 years.
In fairness on this point, the NFL draft has been shortened dramatically over the years. At one point within the time that I was conscious of these sorts of things, the NFL draft was 18 rounds long. Expansion and supplemental draft picks have mitigated the effects of shortening of the draft somewhat, but there were still a lot more players drafted in the 1970's than there are today.
If FSU averaged 3 a season for 14 years or just 2. that would be 42 or 28 more guys. hell just give FSU 1 guy for that 14 year span so we are not tied with iowa
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 12:00 am
by King Crimson
no one is saying you are Iowa's bitch. I mean except tha you don't have 22 first round draft picks and Ferentz does more with less. and Jason White sucks.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 9:48 pm
by Danimal
I'm kinda surprised my 'skers were so high considering for a long-time they depended on overachievers that redshirted and got built-up in what used to be the premiere S&C program in the country. Plus for many of the years we were an option-oriented team which means our qb's, wr's, and even a fair amount of O-linemen(we tended to have shorter guys with quick feet that could pull) that weren't pro-types.
But hey, being ranked that high is something to mention to a recruit so it is all-good.