T1B

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07178/797389-85.stm

Taking action against a pedo after 30 years of allegations...gee, was that a little too hasty?

"Father Rosentsteel served in many parishes."

The Seer wrote:"Father Rosentsteel served in many parishes."

I was thinking that same thing.

Article update:

"It is difficult to comprehend a priest taking the action that he did," Bishop Adamec said. "While Father Rosensteel was facing allegations from the past, those allegations were being processed through appropriate channels."

From what I can tell, jackass, those channels failed both him AND the parishioners. If 30 years cannot inform an organization about the character of an individual, then that organization is obviously not a good judge of character. Unfortunately, judging character is exactly what they think is their business...

Actually, that would be 32 feet per second per second.

(Acceleration, not velocity)

And RACK it anyway.

The Rev. William A. Rosensteel, 64, jumped from a bridge

I hope the rest of these low-life pervs take notes from Rev. Rosensteel's idea of resolving this situation.

Yeah - he deserves some of the credit, too...what was I thinking? Rack him for his innovative solution. Let's hope he proves a compelling role model for other veteran diddling pedos.

mvscal wrote:The Catholic Church needs to be destroyed in this country. Bankrupted and run the fuck out.

HELL NO!!!


I say we completely stack the SCOTUS with them.


Oh, wait... that's been done.


But the American Sheeple won't ever say anything when their government is handed over to special interests, so I guess it doesn't matter.

Hell, I haven't really heard much how the "conservatives"(my, how that word has been perverted) decided that no one can challenge the president handing taxpayer dollars over to the churches of his choice by the boatload.


Uhm yeah... these clowns are really concerned about the Constitution.

Mikey wrote:Actually, that would be 32 feet per second per second.

(Acceleration, not velocity)

And RACK it anyway.

beat me too it, fukker. Just think, if MtLR has his way, nobody in CNY will have a fuggin' clue what we're talking about.

Rack Sir Issac for describing how this shitstain offed himself.

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote:Actually, that would be 32 feet per second per second.

(Acceleration, not velocity)

And RACK it anyway.

beat me too it, fukker. Just think, if MtLR has his way, nobody in CNY will have a fuggin' clue what we're talking about.

Rack Sir Issac for describing how this shitstain offed himself.

Nice to see that my technical correction didn't go over everybody's head.
Guess you're not as dumb as you look.

Try to fit your technical correction into a subject textbox.

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote:Actually, that would be 32 feet per second per second.

(Acceleration, not velocity)

And RACK it anyway.

beat me too it, fukker. Just think, if MtLR has his way, nobody in CNY will have a fuggin' clue what we're talking about.

Rack Sir Issac for describing how this shitstain offed himself.

Lab Rat's a bio guy. He could care less how fast the virus hits the petri dish err pavement.

Now if you want to ask him about the possible infectious diseases a child molesting padre might have passed through the community at large over the 30 odd years that he was buggering little kids, then I'm guessing you might get a dissertation or two.

BTW: I just read in the Altoona paper that the bridge was 190 feet above the river. Assuming that he used a traditional free falling pose, we can safely assume that he reached about 50% of terminal velocity by impact. Which means he face planted at about 60 mph.

http://www.altoonamirror.com/News/artic ... leID=13028

Actually, I'm slightly dumber than I look, but, that's cause I look real smart.

Atleast I don't look as fat as you.

Actually, I'm slightly dumber than I look, but, that's cause I look real smart.

Atleast I don't look as fat as you.

Yes, double posts always make you look exceedingly smart.

Goober McTuber wrote:Yes, double posts always make you look exceedingly smart.

But not slimmer.

Mikey wrote:Actually, that would be 32 feet per second per second.

(Acceleration, not velocity)

And RACK it anyway.

The article doesn't say how high the bridge was. Might not have been more than a 1 second flight.

Cuda wrote:

Mikey wrote:Actually, that would be 32 feet per second per second.

(Acceleration, not velocity)

And RACK it anyway.

The article doesn't say how high the bridge was. Might not have been more than a 1 second flight.

Read more Cooder. It was around 3 seconds.

viewtopic.php?p=438414#438414

Cuda wrote:

Mikey wrote:Actually, that would be 32 feet per second per second.

(Acceleration, not velocity)

And RACK it anyway.

The article doesn't say how high the bridge was. Might not have been more than a 1 second flight.

You're not too fucking bright, are you?

Goober McTuber wrote:

Cuda wrote:

Mikey wrote:Actually, that would be 32 feet per second per second.

(Acceleration, not velocity)

And RACK it anyway.

The article doesn't say how high the bridge was. Might not have been more than a 1 second flight.

You're not too fucking bright, are you?

Wait a second, Cuda could be on to something here. Maybe the Rev. could have jumped off, limped back up the top of the bridge, jumped off, crawled back back up to the top, and jumped off again until he got the job done. Makes sense.

They tried with Cuda, but

The Experiment Has Failed

Some time ago, in fact.

RumpleForeskin wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Cuda wrote: The article doesn't say how high the bridge was. Might not have been more than a 1 second flight.

You're not too fucking bright, are you?

Wait a second, Cuda could be on to something here. Maybe the Rev. could have jumped off, limped back up the top of the bridge, jumped off, crawled back back up to the top, and jumped off again until he got the job done. Makes sense.

Tards of a feather. The drop was 190 feet. If he had landed on your wife, he porobably would have lived.

Goober McTuber wrote:

RumpleForeskin wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote: You're not too fucking bright, are you?

Wait a second, Cuda could be on to something here. Maybe the Rev. could have jumped off, limped back up the top of the bridge, jumped off, crawled back back up to the top, and jumped off again until he got the job done. Makes sense.

Tards of a feather. The drop was 190 feet. If he had landed on your wife, he porobably would have been eaten.

ftfy.

RumpleForeskin wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Cuda wrote: The article doesn't say how high the bridge was. Might not have been more than a 1 second flight.

You're not too fucking bright, are you?

Wait a second, Cuda could be on to something here. Maybe the Rev. could have jumped off, limped back up the top of the bridge, jumped off, crawled back back up to the top, and jumped off again until he got the job done. Makes sense.

The double bonus round always has a better payoff.

Mikey wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote:Actually, that would be 32 feet per second per second.

(Acceleration, not velocity)

And RACK it anyway.

beat me too it, fukker. Just think, if MtLR has his way, nobody in CNY will have a fuggin' clue what we're talking about.

Rack Sir Issac for describing how this shitstain offed himself.

Nice to see that my technical correction didn't go over everybody's head.
Guess you're not as dumb as you look.

Don't you mean 9.8 meters/second/second? - Nish

these numbers do not factor in aero drag, partly because I ain't that smart, but, also, I don't know the coefficient of drag for a pedo priest.

s=1/2a(t squared)

therefore, if it was a 190 ft fall, t=a smidge less than 3.5 seconds

v=at

therefore, dude, if he was in a proper aerodynamic tuck would have been somewhere close to 112 mph. my guess is he was flailing like a little bitch, however and was lucky to make 80 or 90.

whatever. important thing is he got the job done.

rack him, I guess

smackaholic wrote:Just think, if MtLR has his way, nobody in CNY will have a fuggin' clue what we're talking about.

Got no problem with physics.

Got a big problem with dickhead physics TEACHERS

BTW....I'm in WNY.

I have a feeling he was doing the "Preacher's Seat" dive that we all did when we were kids at the neighborhood pool.

wtf is a preacher's seat? something you and your pastor came up with?

RumpleForeskin wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Cuda wrote: The article doesn't say how high the bridge was. Might not have been more than a 1 second flight.

You're not too fucking bright, are you?

Wait a second, Cuda could be on to something here. Maybe the Rev. could have jumped off, limped back up the top of the bridge, jumped off, crawled back back up to the top, and jumped off again until he got the job done. Makes sense.

Next time you think you've got a funnay at the ready... by all means post it. Your overwhelming (but laughable at this point) lack of humor is always good for the brightening of a day.

Thanks, Ken. After careful observation of the mundane and repetitive critiques you have made of my postings, I think its safe to dub you as The Comic Book Guy of T1b. Congrats on your insignificant and unispired role that you play. Anytime you feel like taking a risk and posting without CTRL+V, then do share it with the rest of us. Until then, stop giving Cuda reasons to think its ok for him to post here.

The Comic Book Guy of T1b
That's some pretty schaaaweeeet smack ya' got there, rump.

Comic Book Guy of T1b. Fucking awesome.

Let's elaborate:
Dins: The Google Guy of T1b
wolfman: The Beast Light Guy of T1b
OCmike: The Trebek Guy of T1b
mvscal: The Racist Guy of T1b

Damn. Tight, tight shit.

Don't log back on. Ever. You suck hard.

OCmike wrote:
Don't you mean 9.8 meters/second/second? - Nish

Not sure but I think that the English are actually just as backward as we are, still using "English" (or I-P) units.

Mikey wrote:

OCmike wrote:
Don't you mean 9.8 meters/second/second? - Nish

Not sure but I think that the English are actually just as backward as we are, still using "English" (or I-P) units.

Actually, the brits are all over the map on measurements. They use terms like stone when describing weight, but, they do use the metric sytem for most official stuff I believe.

So, I guess they are about tied with us for fuckedupedness.

How many stone do you figure KC paul weighs?

KFC Paul is not measured in stones, he’s measured in BOULDERS.

I think he's demonstrated a clear lack of stones on a fairly consistent basis.

I'm thinking that "frontbutt" and "manboobs" get as much terminology play in KC as anything in the English or Metric systems.

mvscal wrote:

Ken wrote:mvscal: The Racist Guy of T1b

Cultural Bigot, please.

You wish.

Thinking one race is more GP2V than another, as you do, is racism not cultural bigotry.

Nice try though you stupid racist tard.

Goober McTuber wrote:KFC Paul is not measured in stones, he’s measured in BOULDERS.

And if you run out of boulders you can always revert to calculating it in acres.

Science?

Hook me up with a link you Racist tard.
~~~
PC?

I laughed.