Page 1 of 1

Hey. Anybody see my boy?

Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 6:07 pm
by Mammy
Anybody seen him around here?

dat lil tiny tim?

Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:31 pm
by PSUFAN
Is that a pubic wig you're picking at?

Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:24 pm
by Risa
PSUFAN wrote:Is that a pubic wig you're picking at?
That reminds me of that faggot who made up Shirley Q. Liquor... and
then made up Betty Butterfield as the white counterpart.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YVQ0jfZqsE

He claims he is only paying tribute to the black lady who babysat
ass as a child. I'm like, get the fuck out of here. If he were straight,
the gays would (pretend) to be all over him. But because he's gay,
they have his back.

So which one of you faggots is behind Mammy this time?

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 2:10 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Hep me! HEP ME!

Sorry, Mammy. I last saw Tiny Tim hanging with Qualcomm and Peppercorn. Either he's dead, or taking up living quarters in the underbrush of Annie's armpit.

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:46 am
by Mister Bushice
Risa wrote: the black lady who babysat
ass as a child.
a preschool madam negro?

Musta been one crazy ho house.

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:06 pm
by Risa
I made a typo. Oh well, anyway, a crazy ho house is better than a broke one... and Heidi Fliess is about to have a very broke one:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288419,00.html
Former Hollywood Madam Heidi Fleiss on New Laundromat, Stud Farm
Friday, July 06, 2007

This is a partial transcript of "The Big Story With John Gibson," July 5, 2007, that has been edited for clarity.

JOHN GIBSON, "BIG STORY" HOST: The "Big Talker" is Heidi Fleiss. The former Hollywood madam has dirty laundry and she has the machines to do the wash. Right now she is the proud owner of a Laundromat. That's right, Heidi's wash and dry is called Dirty Laundry. It opens up for business this weekend about an hour outside of Vegas in Pahrump, Nevada.

Dirty Laundry isn't x-rated, but another business Fleiss plans to open up is. She's hoping to open Heidi's Stud Farm about 20 miles from the Laundromat. And when we say stud, we do not mean horses. The woman jailed for running a high-end prostitution ring in Los Angeles wants to open up a legal brothel, this time for women only. She's here now to tell us all about it herself.

...FLEISS: I will get it done. The stud farm will happen. There's definitely a demand for it. I have had over maybe 300 women ready to buy memberships and plenty of men have applied, and let me tell you ladies out there, they won't let you down. And I wish I was open right now.

GIBSON: Well, if I've got this straight, we're talking about male prostitutes for women customers only?

FLEISS: Yeah, we're just switching it up and, look, times have changed, demands have changed, women have changed. They're more independent; they make more money. But let me tell you also: Without Viagra, we couldn't do it.

GIBSON: OK. Can you tell us anything about this business? You know, have you built the building yet, have you set the rate card? Any other details?

FLEISS: Let me tell you, it's uncharted waters for me because I'm used to the other way around, and I saw what's in Nevada and there's some nice brothels, the best by far is the Bunny Ranch in Reno, but I can run circles around them. I plan to submit my application for my brothel license in probably another 60 days.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,287652,00.html
....Heidi says the brothel plans have been put on hold due to a slight complication.

"One brothel owner here has been arrested for allegedly bribing a public official, and I happen to have introduced him to the public official, so that has delayed the stud farm. But it will happen within eight months."

The locals — mostly men — are skeptical about the potential success of a "stud ranch." A highly unscientific survey that included a highway patrolman, bartender and merchant suggests people don't believe women will patronize such a service. But try telling that to Fleiss.

"I already have enough women ready to buy memberships to show it's income-producing," she said. "There's plenty of supply and demand. There's plenty of men who have applied and they are all beautiful and I can't wait to interview them."

Couple questions:

A) Why are the locals mostly men? and why couldn't any women be found to interview about heidi's chances?
B) Is it legal to require prostitutes to ingest performance enhancing drugs? particularly since this particular drug has a very specific legal use, and is not supposed to be used as a party drug? and this particular drug has very specific and well-documented side affects even when used under the direction of a doctor.
C) Men want beauty. Women usually want something different. A female prostitute can be paid just to stand and look at herself in the mirror. And then she has the wherewithal to charge extra just for breathing a certain way. Heidi was apparently charging $10,000 bucks for one night with some of her female hoes. Heidi is reportedly opening dirty laundry to women for the low, low price of $250 an hour with her studs. What can a man do, even with Viagra, that's worth $250 an hour -- base -- for most women?
D) Heidi would make more money supplying gay dudes with gay bois.
E) I can't lie, I'd still go... just for the novelty factor to see what Heidi has up her sleeve. It'd probably be easy to find a couple other women to pool money together to buy a Stud.


I wonder what the extras are going to be, though, and how much they're going to cost.

$250 an hour. Those better be the greatest straight Studs on earth.

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:42 pm
by Tiny Tim
mammy? dat you mammy?


I be hungry mammie

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:52 pm
by Goober McTuber
Risa wrote: Couple questions:

B) Is it legal to require prostitutes to ingest performance enhancing drugs? particularly since this particular drug has a very specific legal use, and is not supposed to be used as a party drug? and this particular drug has very specific and well-documented side affects even when used under the direction of a doctor.


E) I can't lie, I'd still go...
I don’t believe you could have E) without B).

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:58 pm
by Risa
Goober, you mean like in the chorus to Sarah Silverman's 'The Porn Song' (which is the best part of the song)?

The problem (joy?) is that there's more to sex than an erection. A lot of women don't want pounding pounding pounding pounding pounding. They want pounding pounding pounding pounding their own orgasm the male orgasm. That's why you have so many women who get a complex because they think something is wrong with their oral sex technique when the real issue is that no matter how much a guy enjoys oral sex it just isn't what makes them go over the edge into 'getting off'. So the guys Heidi hires have to do more than be beautiful, and have erections on demand, they're gonna have to do a damn good job at faking orgasms.

That's on top of having that extra something that women require in order to want fuck a guy.

Since condoms (Toddowen's issue) are going to have to be de rigeur for public health reasons, these guys aren't going to have to perform all the way. But they will have to be better actors than their female counterparts. Women prostitutes aren't really required to do anything except spread their legs and/or listen (depending on the age and the proclivities of the guy). Enthusiasm and/or beauty is a plus, but not required. Male prostitutes, though? and male prostitutes for women? I wonder what Heidi is setting herself up for. She hasn't really given any details except that she's doing this, she's got clients and boytoys lined up, rumors about cost and she's waiting for licensing.

And the guys will have to screw anyone with money to pay the fee. If 70 year old grandmother is receiving a birthday gift from her daughter and granddaughters, he has to perform. 40 year old chicken plant worker, he has to perform. Couple 20 year old Minnesota grad students, he has to perform. In the same night. He has to perform not only with his erection, but with his mind.

Would you be up to it?

If Heidi can pull this off, with women alone and not opening it up to homo/bisexuals, she'll have shown herself to be not only a genius among geniuses, but a Owner among Owners.

Todd, I have no idea what would have to be performed at such a stud ranch. My mind blanks at contemplating what would be required to run such an operation for the public, to the public's satisfaction and to the stud's emotional and physical health satisfaction. Her quip about Viagra tells me it's not going to work. This isn't a male oriented porn where if you can get it up on demand, you're making money no matter what you look like or what your chemistry (or lack thereof) is with your fellow actresses. Women are going to be buying the services. The stakes are higher than the fantasies (and riots) presented by acts like Chippendales. This is going all the way.

If you have to be drugged up to have sex, to be able to perform, you will fuck your body up. Is it worth it?

Maybe Nish could answer. Shit is different over in Europe, right? and he pulled the male exotic dancer thing. So maybe he knows better than anyone what would be required to go all the way and still come out having fun and enjoying what you do while making money as a male.

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:05 pm
by PSUFAN
Tiny Tim wrote:mammy? dat you mammy?


I be hungry mammie
Your mommy ain't here, man.

Might I be of service?

Sin,
Image

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:21 pm
by Goober McTuber
Risa wrote:And the guys will have to screw anyone with money to pay the fee. If 70 year old grandmother is receiving a birthday gift from her daughter and granddaughters, he has to perform. 40 year old chicken plant worker, he has to perform. Couple 20 year old Minnesota grad students, he has to perform.
That was my point, you ignorant, tedious cunt. He would need the Viagra to perform with the 70 year old grandmother. With you, he would need a continuous intravenous Viagra drip, along with a penile splint. And a ball-gag for you.

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:57 pm
by Risa
And my point, Goober, is that using a drug in a way in which it is not intended is a violation of federal law -- is it not? Heidi is intending to use Viagra, which is ONLY intended for legitimate erectile dysfunction, in a way which appears to condone abuse. For example, methamphetamine and amphetamine both have legimate prescription uses. But using meth in order to get through a finals week all nighter or to perform at one's job is a violation of that legitimate use. A company can't hand out meth to its workers so that they will work harder and faster for the benefit of the company's bottom line. A school can't hand out meth so students with alleged ADD issues can be better handled so that they can perform better to meet No Child Left Behind standards.

Heidi can't be handing out Viagra to her stable in order that they are able to better do the job they are hired for. If she can't make this work without resorting to using a prescription drug illegally, she needs to be shut down before she has begun.

Besides, what do pregnant women have to worry about if they get Viagra in their systems?

All the men out there will to screw, and willing to be paid to screw on top? there's gotta be dudes out there who are Stable material, who really do love all women, or can act like it. And if their dicks aren't available, another 2 or 3 or 4 dudes of the same looks and temperament can be found. That's all. More studs, less drugs.

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:33 pm
by Goober McTuber
Legal or not, the only way some poor sap is going to get it up for you is with significant chemical assistance. That was my point. BTW, doctors often prescribe drugs for other than their express treatment purpose. It's called "off label" or "extra-label" use.

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:37 pm
by Risa
I did not know that. Is the doctor alone on the hook for any complications that arise from such 'off label' usage? (I guess JSC, if he were less busy, could answer that, since it gets into malpractice.) If it's possible to use it in such a way, why isn't it on the label?

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:51 pm
by Goober McTuber
Go do your own research, you lazy, tedious cunt.

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:05 pm
by Mammy
lordie me, all this chat chat and words words.

whatcha all talkin about.

I just wanna find me boy

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:38 pm
by tuff gong
Damn, mammy you been lookin for that little dicksprinkle for a couple years! Is that a black diaper you got there for him? That is so chic.

Me, I'm looking for Douchebag. I was hoping he takes requests.

To: D-Bags
From: Tuff Gong
Re: Risa

Dear Douchebag:

Please amend your beatdown list to include: Risa.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

your buddy

Tuff