Page 1 of 1

Kentucky!!!!

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:03 am
by TenTallBen
WOW!!!!

Anybody watching this?????

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:50 am
by RadioFan
Reece Davis uncharacteristically fucked up the highlight final, earlier.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:54 am
by Jimmy Medalions
Watch Arkansas drop 12" into them next weekend...

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:03 am
by Q, West Coast Style
No surprises here. All Rich Brooks needs is a little time, like say, a decade or two, and he'll turn a program around.

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:47 am
by Danimal
Brooks started last season with one foot in the grave and the other on loose-dirt, now Kentucky seems to be on the way up. Props to him. Ya Louisville was a rivals-game which can bring out an underdog's game of the year(see ISU vs Iowa) but Kentucky does have one of the country's best offenses. If Brooks can find a D then they could become something. Right now they are kinda like Tacho Tech-Appalachia.

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 1:42 pm
by Goober McTuber
Can someone explain to me why after Kentucky scored their last TD to move ahead 39-34, they didn’t go for two? They kicked the extra point for a 40-34 lead. Louisville came close to scoring at the end of the game, and a PAT kick would have given them the win.

Also, in the Alabama-Arkansas game the Tide trailed by 7 with a little more than 4 minutes left. 4th down at the Arkansas 25 yard line and they kick a field goal. Why would you not go for the first down? Arkansas had a chance to run out the clock for the win, and probably would have if they put McFadden back in. Alabama was very lucky to win that game.

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:04 pm
by Q, West Coast Style
Goober McTuber wrote:Can someone explain to me why after Kentucky scored their last TD to move ahead 39-34, they didn’t go for two?
Simple explanation: Rich Brooks.

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:09 pm
by quacker backer
Q, West Coast Style wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Can someone explain to me why after Kentucky scored their last TD to move ahead 39-34, they didn’t go for two?
Simple explanation: Rich Brooks.
beat me to it

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:15 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Any 7 year old playing Madden would've known to go for 2 in that situation. There was about 25 secs left, and Louisville was pretty much guaranteed to have the last possession. Really quite mind boggling.

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:30 pm
by Q, West Coast Style
Maybe Rich was afraid that if they went for two his QB might throw a pick that would be run back for two points cutting the lead to a field goal.

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:34 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Maybe he got confused and said "I was told there would be no math."

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:41 am
by T REX
What a great ball Woodsen throws....its a perfect spiral and right on the money. He' the real deal.