T1B

Here's where my vote would go:

Giuliani v. Clinton: Giuliani

Romney v. Clinton: Clinton

Thompson v. Clinton: Tossup (worst-case scenario), leaning toward Thompson, currently

Giuliani v. Obama: Giuliani

Romney v. Obama: Obama

Thompson v. Obama: Obama

You lucky, lucky people.

What an enormous wealth of candidates you have.

Here's another option:

Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

RadioFan wrote:Here's where my vote would go:

Giuliani v. Clinton: Giuliani

Romney v. Clinton: Clinton

Thompson v. Clinton: Tossup (worst-case scenario), leaning toward Thompson, currently

Giuliani v. Obama: Giuliani

Romney v. Obama: Obama

Thompson v. Obama: Obama

Good to see ideology and political ideals dont guide your vote.

Martyred wrote:
Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

That would be a seriously tough choice.

Martyred wrote:Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

I have nothing against Canada. But I love where I am. And both of your options would involve relocation. So I'll have to pass.

Anyway, here goes.

Giuliani v. Clinton: Clinton
Romney v. Clinton: Clinton
Thompson v. Clinton: Clinton
Giuliani v. Obama: Obama
Romney v. Obama: Obama
Thompson v. Obama: Obama

That being said, I'd rather see Edwards get the Democratic nod.

Giuliani v. Clinton: Paul

Romney v. Clinton: Paul

Thompson v. Clinton: Paul

Giuliani v. Obama: Paul

Romney v. Obama: Paul

Thompson v. Obama: Paul



Of course, we can't completely discount Neil Diamond's write-in campaign yet.

BSmack wrote:Giuliani v. Clinton: Clinton
Romney v. Clinton: Clinton
Thompson v. Clinton: Clinton
Giuliani v. Obama: Obama
Romney v. Obama: Obama
Thompson v. Obama: Obama

That being said, I'd rather see Edwards get the Democratic nod.

Second. On all of the above.

Dinsdale wrote:Giuliani v. Clinton: Paul

Romney v. Clinton: Paul

Thompson v. Clinton: Paul

Giuliani v. Obama: Paul

Romney v. Obama: Paul

Thompson v. Obama: Paul



Of course, we can't completely discount Neil Diamond's write-in campaign yet.

That gets a rack.

Too bad the Guns & Dope Party has gone bust. EDIT: the URL is back up http://www.maybelogic.com/gunsanddopeparty/
("Every Man a Tsar"... or was it "Every Tsar an Ostrich"?) EDIT: it was BOTH

Also: "Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action."

&

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined,
but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a
status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them,
which would include their own government."

both by-- George Washington

Martyred wrote:Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

Looks like Harper's starting to crack down on potheads up north. Not so sure I want to move there anymore if it's just going to be USA North.

Reversing earlier moves to decriminalize marijuana use, Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada announced new legal and spending measures against drug use and distribution on Thursday.

Giuliani v. Clinton: Giuliani

Romney v. Clinton: Romney

Thompson v. Clinton: Thompson

Giuliani v. Obama: Toss-up but leaning Giuliani. How much do we really know about Obama, as yet? I don't know much about the guy. He doesn't seem to answer prodding/harder questions very well.

Romney v. Obama: Romney

Thompson v. Obama: Thompson

Martyred wrote: Here's another option:

Blow your brains out v. Move to Canada

No discernible difference there.

I waiting for Newt to jump in

BSmack wrote:
Reversing earlier moves to decriminalize marijuana use, Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada announced new legal and spending measures against drug use and distribution on Thursday.

..."the government would spend about $64 million"...


Whoah...that's showing 'em.

Sincerely,




BTW, Smackie spends more than that on Rizlas. Weekly.

RadioFan wrote:Here's where my vote would go:

Giuliani v. Clinton: Giuliani

Romney v. Clinton: Clinton

Thompson v. Clinton: Tossup (worst-case scenario), leaning toward Thompson, currently

Giuliani v. Obama: Giuliani

Romney v. Obama: Obama

Thompson v. Obama: Obama

If you place a vote for any of the above (or Gore, Newt, ... whoever) then you deserve the America that you'll continue to get.
Circling faster .......

Dins gets it.

RadioFan wrote:Giuliani

Isn't just a fucking bald-face liar, but he revels in it.


Giuliani claims that he was at the Ground Zero site "as often, if not more, than most workers.... I was there working with them. I was exposed to exactly the same things they were exposed to. So in that sense, I'm one of them."


He was there for a grand total of 29 hours over three months.

Not even just a run-of-the-mill lie... no, that's an extra-large supersized lie, which should be offensive to... everyone.


His stellar judgement resulted in him putting the Office of Emergency Management in the World Trade Center. Hey Rudy, maybe you're not so good with New York history, so I'll help... uhm, the WTC was the target of a terrorist attck in 1993. It was kind of a big deal at the time. Sorry you never heard about it. Of course, when questioned about this decision, Rudy, OF COURSE, tossed someone else under the bus for it. I guess he doesn't really understand how responsibility and accountability works in the governmental hierarchy... yup, good presidential material, right there.


So, PubWhore is more than willing to take credit for the positives that he had nothing to do with, yet is more than willing to pass the buck when he fucks up.

Yet some of you complete fucking tards will endorse him, despite him being a KNOWN flagrant liar. And then you'll have the gall to complain about the government, even though you fully endorsed dishonesty and corruption, and didn't demand any better.


I feel sorry for anyone who is that easily mislead, and is such a coward they refuse to stand up to the good old boys network.

Martyred wrote:..."the government would spend about $64 million"...

Whoah...that's showing 'em.

Sincerely,



BTW, Smackie spends more than that on Rizlas. Weekly.

64 million is like 1 million per Canadian eh?

Plus, thanks to the Idiot In Chief here, the Canadian dollar is actually worth 64 million. I know you're used to your currency being worth 2/3 of an American dollar, but those days are long gone. If this continues the NHL may decide to relocate back to Winnipeg.

BSmack wrote:If this continues the NHL may decide to relocate back to Winnipeg.

Go Jets, go!

Dinsdale wrote:Isn't just a fucking bald-face liar, but he revels in it.


Giuliani claims that he was at the Ground Zero site "as often, if not more, than most workers.... I was there working with them. I was exposed to exactly the same things they were exposed to. So in that sense, I'm one of them."


He was there for a grand total of 29 hours over three months.

Not even just a run-of-the-mill lie... no, that's an extra-large supersized lie, which should be offensive to... everyone.


His stellar judgement resulted in him putting the Office of Emergency Management in the World Trade Center. Hey Rudy, maybe you're not so good with New York history, so I'll help... uhm, the WTC was the target of a terrorist attck in 1993. It was kind of a big deal at the time. Sorry you never heard about it. Of course, when questioned about this decision, Rudy, OF COURSE, tossed someone else under the bus for it. I guess he doesn't really understand how responsibility and accountability works in the governmental hierarchy... yup, good presidential material, right there.


So, PubWhore is more than willing to take credit for the positives that he had nothing to do with, yet is more than willing to pass the buck when he fucks up.

Yet some of you complete fucking tards will endorse him, despite him being a KNOWN flagrant liar. And then you'll have the gall to complain about the government, even though you fully endorsed dishonesty and corruption, and didn't demand any better.

Sounds an awful lot like a rerun of a President I'm only too familiar with. That's the last thing we need.

Hasn't Ghouliani already had two do-overs in marriage?

You don't get do-overs when you step in the oval office.

Aside from that, the last thing we need in the oval office is another liberal.


This guy is a serious 'tard.

No joke.

Terry in Crapchester wrote: Sounds an awful lot like a rerun of a President I'm only too familiar with. That's the last thing we need.

Bill's not running, his "wife" is, but your point is well taken

My problem with Giuliani isn't that he cheated on his wife while mayor. Politicians are often dogs. That's understood. My issue derives on his brashness about it. Crap. At least lie to me about your affair. Let's try to pretend that you accept what you're doing (cheating) is wrong. Even Bill Clinton understood this. Hence, the lies about Monica. Craziness.

You sure about that?

When you get married you make a vow -- in front of maybe hundreds, ... perhaps thousands of family, friends, associates -- PROMISING to honor your chosen mate, and to keep yourself sexually faithful to that mate.

Ghouliani has twice broken that promise.


That's a 'tard, my friend.

mvscal wrote:Simply cheating on your wife isn't anyone else's business.

Shut your fucking hole, you traitor.


Sin
Ken Star, American Revolutionary

poptart wrote:Aside from that, the last thing we need in the oval office is another liberal.

yeah because we all know the last eight years have been filled with peace and prosperity, you fucking idiot.

A no to everyone on your list.

A maybe for Romney or Thompson

mvscal wrote:They've been quite prosperous for me.

Piss off, tard.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

poptart wrote:Aside from that, the last thing we need in the oval office is another liberal.

yeah because we all know the last eight years have been filled with peace and prosperity, you fucking idiot.

Bush is not a conservative ..... idiot.

Bush is quite possibly the most "liberal" president in American history.


The now-invalid Constitution out front should have told you.

Dinsdale wrote:Giuliani v. Clinton: Paul

Romney v. Clinton: Paul

Thompson v. Clinton: Paul

Giuliani v. Obama: Paul

Romney v. Obama: Paul

Thompson v. Obama: Paul

If I could only give a RACK to one post in the history of the message boards dating back to SCIII, this would be that post.

Oh, the groundswell for Paul almost has a grassroots feel to it.

Hell, the only campaigning I've seen besides stupid PR appearances by the candidates has been for Paul, which has been going on for months and months. It's actually startling how much support Paul has here in Hippyland (although the impression people have of Oregon being some ultra-liberal state isn't that accurate, although it's starting to lean that way with all of the transplants).


Dude is straight blowing up around here. Don't count him out just yet.

Dinsdale wrote:Oh, the groundswell for Paul almost has a grassroots feel to it.

Hell, the only campaigning I've seen besides stupid PR appearances by the candidates has been for Paul, which has been going on for months and months. It's actually startling how much support Paul has here in Hippyland (although the impression people have of Oregon being some ultra-liberal state isn't that accurate, although it's starting to lean that way with all of the transplants).


Dude is straight blowing up around here. Don't count him out just yet.

lol

Sorry, but this post was way too funny. I heard Paul in his fullest for the first time Tuesday. He's a whiner. Plain and simple. He has no real solutions. Just a laundry list of complaints. And you're going to vote for him. Sad, son, sad.

battery chucka' one wrote: He has no real solutions.

This, coming from someone who thinks Fred "The Hammer" Thompson is the answer to all our problems is just about hilarious.

Mikey wrote:

battery chucka' one wrote: He has no real solutions.

This, coming from someone who thinks Fred "The Hammer" Thompson is the answer to all our problems is just about hilarious.

Who says he's the answer to ALL our problems? When is the government ever the answer to our problems? I swear, you're like a 12 year old who thinks he's politically savvy. Have you learned to wipe your own nose yet or is that what you're looking for in a president? Incredible. You attack candidates who actually might solutions in favor of those who desire to just create more problems (sans solutions). Hilarity is truly your forte'.

battery chucka' one wrote:You attack candidates who actually might solutions in favor of those who desire to just create more problems (sans solutions).

First day with the new Babelfish? What language did you try to translate that from?

BSmack wrote:

battery chucka' one wrote:You attack candidates who actually might be able to provide solutions in favor of those who desire to merely create more problems (sans solutions).

First day with the new Babelfish? What language did you try to translate that from?

Please tell me you didn't know what I was saying. I'm doing about fifty different things right now. However, here it is in its edited state.

battery chucka' one wrote:

BSmack wrote:

battery chucka' one wrote:You attack candidates who actually might be able to provide solutions in favor of those who desire to merely create more problems (sans solutions).

First day with the new Babelfish? What language did you try to translate that from?

Please tell me you didn't know what I was saying. I'm doing about fifty different things right now. However, here it is in its edited state.

Maybe instead of doing 50 things poorly, you should try to do one thing well.

Just sayin.

BSmack wrote:

battery chucka' one wrote:

BSmack wrote: First day with the new Babelfish? What language did you try to translate that from?

Please tell me you didn't know what I was saying. I'm doing about fifty different things right now. However, here it is in its edited state.

Maybe instead of doing 50 things poorly, you should try to do one thing well.

Just sayin.

And still, you answer no criticisms leveled at your boy Paul. Way to go. Not unexpected. Keep as you are. That's where you do the least damage.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

mvscal wrote:They've been quite prosperous for me.

Piss off, tard.

You are aware that the Bush Administration has been paying people to post their talking points on various message boards on the interwebs while posing as ordinary citizens?

I have little doubt, within that context, that mvscal is on the level here.

battery chucka' one wrote:your boy Paul.

BSmack wrote: Giuliani v. Clinton: Clinton
Romney v. Clinton: Clinton
Thompson v. Clinton: Clinton
Giuliani v. Obama: Obama
Romney v. Obama: Obama
Thompson v. Obama: Obama

Way to go. Not unexpected.

battery chucka' one wrote:

Mikey wrote:

battery chucka' one wrote: He has no real solutions.

This, coming from someone who thinks Fred "The Hammer" Thompson is the answer to all our problems is just about hilarious.

Who says he's the answer to ALL our problems? When is the government ever the answer to our problems? I swear, you're like a 12 year old who thinks he's politically savvy. Have you learned to wipe your own nose yet or is that what you're looking for in a president? Incredible. You attack candidates who actually might solutions in favor of those who desire to just create more problems (sans solutions). Hilarity is truly your forte'.

Uh....dumbass.

You just attacked Paul for having "no real solutions", and then claim to like Thompson for the very same reason.

Nice try anyway.