Page 1 of 1
Where's Stanford?
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:11 pm
by Mikey
After beating #1 USC, Stanford definitely deserves to be in the top 5...errr....25.
I mean, look at #25 Tennessee.
OK they have one less loss than Stanford, but all of the Cardinal's 3 losses have been to top 25 teams (at the time at least).
OK, the Vols' two losses were also to top 25 teams but the best win they have is against #12 Georgia.
I think a win on the road against The Best Team in the History of College Football is just a liiiiiiiiiitttttttttle bigger than a home win against the 'Dawgs. Sayin'...
When they beat The Second Best Team in the History of College Football on December 1, they will rightfully claim #1.
For now I'm calling SEC bias. And fuck any of you who disagree.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:17 pm
by Jimmy Medalions
I'm pretty sure Stanford is still lodged in John David Booty's...errr...Bootie.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:30 pm
by Mr T
The fact that USC is still ranked in the top 10 is a fucking disgrace.
They lost to the tree.
That is like losing to Duke, Vandy, Army, ect.
Fuck your east coast bias shit
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:48 pm
by Mikey
The last home game that SC lost, in 2001, was to...Stanford.
"The Tree" as you call them, has lost 3 games this season. All 3 losses were to PAC10 teams, any of which (including Stanford) would bury any ACC team, especially the always overrated Criminoles, 95 out of 100 times.
Stanford beat San Jose State, a WAC powerhouse, 37-0. I don't think I'm going out on a limb by saying that the WAC is superior to the ACC and equal to, if not better than, the SEC, team for team.
Mr T wrote:The fact that USC is still ranked in the top 10 is a fucking disgrace.
SC's only loss is to Stanford, a team that, after they beat #1 Cal in December, will be a legitimate BCS Bowl contender.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:00 pm
by Mr T
haha...I am guessing your trolling....
Or you may be retarded
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:11 pm
by Adelpiero
Mr T wrote:haha...I am guessing your trolling....
Or you may be retarded
the latter i'd say
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 8:24 pm
by Mikey
Adelpiero wrote:Mr T wrote:haha...I am guessing your trolling....
Or you may be retarded
the latter i'd say
That's pretty funny, coming from a tard who's
required to wear a Tigers helmet whenever he leaves the house.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:02 pm
by Mikey
Nice pussy move, Adel.
Delete your weak-assed comeback before it could be responded to.
Par for the course.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:14 pm
by Mr T
Mikey wrote:
"The Tree" as you call them, has lost 3 games this season. All 3 losses were to PAC10 teams, any of which (including Stanford) would bury any ACC team, especially the always overrated Criminoles, 95 out of 100 times.
UCLA, Oregon, ASU, or Stanford could beat any team in the ACC?
Oregon could beat any team in the ACC. The rest would be lucky to beat Duke.
Stanford beat San Jose State, a WAC powerhouse, 37-0.
A wac powerhouse? 3-3? One winning season since 2001. Yeah powerhouse....
I don't think I'm going out on a limb by saying that the WAC is superior to the ACC and equal to, if not better than, the SEC, team for team.
I will just let this speak for itself
The trees are 2-3. Beat a shitty San Jose St squad and upset USC. And they deserved to be ranked?
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:16 pm
by The Seer
Mikey wrote:The last home game that SC lost, in 2001, was to...Stanford.
"The Tree" as you call them, has lost 3 games this season. All 3 losses were to PAC10 teams, any of which (including Stanford) would bury any ACC team, especially the always overrated Criminoles, 95 out of 100 times.
Stanford beat San Jose State, a WAC powerhouse, 37-0. I don't think I'm going out on a limb by saying that the WAC is superior to the ACC and equal to, if not better than, the SEC, team for team.
Mr T wrote:The fact that USC is still ranked in the top 10 is a fucking disgrace.
SC's only loss is to Stanford, a team that, after they beat #1 Cal in December, will be a legitimate BCS Bowl contender.
No need to blue pencil any of this......
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:16 pm
by Adelpiero
tried to edit, had double post, deleted them both. Shit dsl connection, they are running fiber for ATT cable. Actually sucks, but thanx for caring.
as i said, your a fucking idiot.
you've shown how stupid you are on virtually every forum. Cheers to you for not sticking to one forum to tard up, you shot for the stars and decided to shit on every forum.
from your shit baseball takes, especially your padre rants and raves, to your shit football and charger takes, to your shit political and general life rants, you have done it all. Ever thought about retiring bigboy? You should go out on top!
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:19 pm
by Mr T
The Seer wrote:
No need to blue pencil any of this......
Really?
BTW, Thanks for the sig Mikey
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:21 pm
by Killian
Mr T wrote:
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:26 pm
by Mikey
Adelpiero wrote:tried to edit, had double post, deleted them both. Shit dsl connection, they are running fiber for ATT cable. Actually sucks, but thanx for caring.
as i said, your a fucking idiot.
you've shown how stupid you are on virtually every forum. Cheers to you for not sticking to one forum to tard up, you shot for the stars and decided to shit on every forum.
from your shit baseball takes, especially your padre rants and raves, to your shit football and charger takes, to your shit political and general life rants, you have done it all. Ever thought about retiring bigboy? You should go out on top!
Thanks for biting, mudpuppy.
Your fatuousness is once again greatly appreciated.
No need to hurry BTW...I'll wait while you look it up.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:27 pm
by Mr T
Thats what I thought Killian....
Mr T wrote:haha...I am guessing your trolling....
Or you may be retarded
But he is a pac-10/west coast homer
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:30 pm
by SoCalTrjn
With Booty at QB, I doubt USC could beat Duke
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:31 pm
by Mikey
Mr T wrote:The Seer wrote:
No need to blue pencil any of this......
Really?
BTW, Thanks for the sig Mikey
No problem.
I will expect royalties, though.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:33 pm
by M Club
Adelpiero wrote:
as i said, your a fucking idiot.
this genre of insult will always make my day.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:45 pm
by Killian
SoCalTrjn wrote:With Booty at QB, I doubt USC could beat Duke
Don't break your ankle jumping off the bandwaggon now.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:56 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Adelpiero wrote:you've shown how stupid you are on virtually every forum.
Actually, he brings the lumber in the Cooking forum.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:05 pm
by Mikey
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Adelpiero wrote:you've shown how stupid you are on virtually every forum.
Actually, he brings the lumber in the Cooking forum.
Well, thanks for that.
You're entitled to one free recipe. Nothing to do with baking, though.
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:11 pm
by Adelpiero
Mikey wrote:MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Adelpiero wrote:you've shown how stupid you are on virtually every forum.
Actually, he brings the lumber in the Cooking forum.
Well, thanks for that.
You're entitled to one free recipe. Nothing to do with baking, though.
fuck him, i asked about a good hot wing recipe and he gave me nothing. I'm still bitter, i ended up making some hot wings from hell!
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:23 pm
by Jimmy Medalions
SoCalTrjn wrote:With Booty at QB, I doubt USC could beat Duke
I get it. It's all Pete Carroll's fault for firing Norm Chow.
Rah rah, and all that junk.
Get a grip.
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:35 am
by SoCalTrjn
Im not sure you can point at Carroll as the blame other than him choosing to keep Seto on staff instead of Mark Carrier or keeping Booty in after he broke his finger and started tossing up ints.
However, since Chow has left, how many titles has USC won? how many times have they come out in the second half and shown that the adjustments they made were the right ones? The coaching staff has progressively gotten worse every year since 2004 yet the team has got more and more talented 5 star players.
This Trojan team doesnt have a single quality win and they have looked horrible in 3 of their 5 games, they are what they are, an over rated group of players who will likely wind up 8-4 and play in the emerald nut bowl
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:32 am
by indyfrisco
Adel,
Did you try my hot wing sauce? I thought I posted a link to it for you.
edit: Yeah I thought I did. No reason for your wings to suck.
As for Mikey....
Makes his post AFTER the "upset" win...CHECK!
VERRRY homer with the post....CHECK!
Claims victories over shit teams are justified because losses are to powerful PAC teams...CHECK!
Concludes with an "SEC bias" line...CHECK!
trixie resets will never get old.
Sin,
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:33 pm
by Mikey
Too much reading?
ShamelessHomer wrote:Stanford beat San Jose State, a WAC powerhouse, 37-0. I don't think I'm going out on a limb by saying that the WAC is superior to the ACC and equal to, if not better than, the SEC, team for team.
^^^^^^^^^^
BTW, anybody who "knows" CFB (as everybody around here seems to think they do) would have known from this, if not from the first line of my first post, that I couldn't possibly be serious.
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:53 pm
by Dinsdale
Piss off, Mikey.
If Stanford is the undisputed #1, it causes some problems.
Oregon pushed Furd's stool in, in their own house.
If Furd is #1, that would make Oregon #0.5 .
And I refuse to deal with fractional rankings.
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:04 pm
by Mikey
Well, if they beat Kal they should definitely be undisputed #1.
In the Bay Area, at least, since they beat CSUSJ and all. UC Davis might have an argument with that though.
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:10 pm
by The Seer
Dinsdale wrote:Piss off, Mikey.
If Stanford is the undisputed #1, it causes some problems.
Oregon pushed Furd's stool in, in their own house.
If Furd is #1, that would make Oregon #0.5 .
And I refuse to deal with fractional rankings.
UCLA - 45
Stanford - 17
At Stanford.
We want in.
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:20 pm
by Mikey
You lost to Notre Dame.
After Stanford pulls out a last minute miracle against the Fighting Leprechauns you won't have any claim at all.