BREAKING NEWS: Ron Paul shot...in intensive care..

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:15 am

Ooops. Sorry.

A couple of months early on that one. My bad. Please disregard.

OTST · Post by **OTST** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:19 am

TROTS as this uber tard thinks we know or care who Ron Paul is.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:56 am

Paul won't need to be shot. He'll never poll over 20%.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:06 am

BSmack wrote:Paul won't need to be shot. He'll never poll over 20%.

You deserve Romney.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:49 am

Martyred wrote:
BSmack wrote:Paul won't need to be shot. He'll never poll over 20%.
You deserve Romney.

Follow the money. It ain't going to the GOP.

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:07 am

BSmack wrote:
Martyred wrote:
BSmack wrote:Paul won't need to be shot. He'll never poll over 20%.
You deserve Romney.
Follow the money. It ain't going to the GOP.

We haven't even seen "the money" yet. You do realize that campaign donations before Primary's are used by Corporate Power Brokers to buy the best loser as well as pimping the chosen one right?

oh...nevermind

I forgot about your myopia problem.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:36 am

Y2K wrote:
BSmack wrote:Follow the money. It ain't going to the GOP.
We haven't even seen "the money" yet. You do realize that campaign donations before Primary's are used by Corporate Power Brokers to buy the best loser as well as pimping the chosen one right?

oh...nevermind

I forgot about your myopia problem.

http://www.opensecrets.org/overview/sta ... Cycle=2008

Read it and weep.

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:16 am

Like I thought, it was over your head.

If you bothered to actually read a few pages in your link you would have seen how naive and myopic you are. Look at the percentages.
Hmmmmm.....
I wonder why a Strongly GOP or Demo Corporate Donor would spend say 30% towards an opposing party candidate who doesn't represent their interests.....

Deep isn't it.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:23 am

Y2K wrote:Like I thought, it was over your head.

If you bothered to actually read a few pages in your link you would have seen how naive and myopic you are. Look at the percentages.
Hmmmmm.....
I wonder why a Strongly GOP or Demo Corporate Donor would spend say 30% towards an opposing party candidate who doesn't represent their interests.....

Deep isn't it.

Not really. Everybody knows that money buys access. It's been like that since the founding of the republic.

That being said, the guys you're shilling for are getting the 30% instead of the 70% they used to get. Which was my point all along. A point that for some reason you feel like trying to spin.

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:18 am

the guys you're shilling for are getting the 30% instead of the 70% they used to get

The guy's I'm shilling for? I see. So you are so dense that you think I'm one of the whopping 0.13% of the US population that donates money to candidates? That's funny. Anytime you want to remove your partisan head out of your ass and grab a clue or two......

Like I said before, you haven't seen "The Money" yet idiot.

Take the tobacco Industry for example. Before the Primary's they will donate 30 to 40% towards say "Hillary" mmmkay?

After Hillary is the chosen candidate they will donate "maybe" 1%.........

Why would the donate to Hillary ahead of the Primary's?
It's not because they want her as President.

Stop being so stupid.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:41 am

Y2K wrote:
the guys you're shilling for are getting the 30% instead of the 70% they used to get
The guy's I'm shilling for?

Ah, so now you're not a Republican?

Tears Jerry. Tears.

I see. So you are so dense that you think I'm one of the whopping 0.13% of the US population that donates money to candidates?

I don't know or care about your donor activities or lack thereof. They're not germane to the subject at hand.

Take the tobacco Industry for example. Before the Primary's they will donate 30 to 40% towards say "Hillary" mmmkay?

After Hillary is the chosen candidate they will donate "maybe" 1%.........

Why would the donate to Hillary ahead of the Primary's?
It's not because they want her as President.

Stop being so stupid.

Could you possibly be any more obstinate or tedious? I never once said that people were giving money to Hillary because they "want" her to win. They're giving money to Dems far in excess of GOP candidates because they see their impending electoral victory in 2008 as inevitable. If you think that will change after the primaries, you're seeing something in the political landscape that nobody else is.

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:13 am

Yes Bri, I am a registered as Republican ok?

I obviously misunderstood "shilling" as meaning I donate cash but thanks to this quote,

They're giving money to Dems far in excess of GOP candidates because they see their impending electoral victory in 2008 as inevitable.

I stand corrected and know exactly what a "Party Shill" actually is and what "shilling" means.

My Bad.

I don't fucking "shill" for any political party dumbass, Somehow a future as a braindead lemming just doesn't seem worth the effort. I have my own opinions on shit and I vote for whomever I think is worth my time at the booth.

inevitable........

You can stop the "bleating" anytime soon. You can't grasp the fact that making any "predictions" at all let alone assuming the inevitable by "Following the Money" this early on in an election cycle is pretty fucking stupid at best.

OK

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:21 pm

Y2K wrote:Yes Bri, I am a registered as Republican ok?

Wow, how shocking.

I obviously misunderstood "shilling" as meaning I donate cash but thanks to this quote,

They're giving money to Dems far in excess of GOP candidates because they see their impending electoral victory in 2008 as inevitable.
I stand corrected and know exactly what a "Party Shill" actually is and what "shilling" means.

Sorry if the raw truth has you so pissed. You do understand the exact same logic applied in favor of the GOP during the years prior to 2006?

Just tell me you knew.

I don't fucking "shill" for any political party dumbass, Somehow a future as a braindead lemming just doesn't seem worth the effort. I have my own opinions on shit and I vote for whomever I think is worth my time at the booth.

That's what most registered Republicans tell me. Usually right after they shill for their candidates. It's really rather laughable.

inevitable........

You can stop the "bleating" anytime soon. You can't grasp the fact that making any "predictions" at all let alone assuming the inevitable by "Following the Money" this early on in an election cycle is pretty fucking stupid at best. OK

Whatever. I guess you just can't handle the truth. Then again, were I defending a crew whose approval ratings were somewhere between "Go fuck yourself" and "Die pig die", I guess I'd feel obligated to say it was "too early to tell.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:05 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:Then again, were I defending a crew whose approval ratings were somewhere between "Go fuck yourself" and "Die pig die",
Leave Congress out of this.

12% GOP Congressional approval ratings say what?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:56 pm

Y2K wrote:
guy's
Primary's
Primary's?

Stop being so stupid.

Trying to jam up a brotha from posting some righteous smack by pointing out a spelling error or three is pretty weak. However, not having a fucking clue in the world how to properly pluralize any and all words in the English language is much, much worse. Holy Christ.