Page 1 of 1

Week 9:

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:18 am
by RadioFan
1. RACK Oregon's defense. And to all of the USC media types (clueless fuckstains out East, mostly) left speechless after that beating: A hearty FUCK YOU, along with all of you god damned bandwaggoners and especially to ESPN "USC vs. the greatest ever" guy, whose job it is to cue up that horseshit. The dynasty is OVER, at least for this year, Thank God.

2. RACK Georgia.
Hey Trix, how are your boy's Heisman trophy hopes, now, bitch? Quite possibly the asskicking of the year. Bwaahahaaaa!!!!!

3. UNRACK South Florida. Connecticut? Are you fucking kidding me?

4. Ditto for Missouri. NOT covering against Iowa State, in Columbia? FUCK YOU. Get ready for your asses to be handed to you ala the way OU lost, very soon with that weak-assed shit.

5. Despite trying to lose the game in the last 2 minutes, RACK the FUCK out of KU for having the first 9-0 season, since 1906 or some shit, and doing it at College Station. 12th man? Bwaaaah! 12th woman more like it. Oh, but you've got Texas coming up in a few weeks, so it doesn't really matter, right AtM Fan? :meds:

6. RACK Tennessee. I hate that fucking smirk on Steve Spurrier's face, but I kinda like it when it's in reaction to LOSING. Bwwwwwhaaaaaa! FUCK YOU, Superior.

7. RACK friends, good food, beer, other substances, and you fuckers, not necessarily in that order.


OUT

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:26 am
by RadioFan
8. UNRACK tOSU for winning tonight. FUCK YOU, too.

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:29 am
by peter dragon
RadioFan wrote:8. UNRACK tOSU for winning tonight. FUCK YOU, too.
Image

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:33 am
by RadioFan
If the MNC game were played today, I'm sure you'd be "worried" about BC.

Boy, what a great game that would be!

:meds:

BC needs to lose in order for me to even begin to start "hating" tOSU, given what a complete asskicking that would be, dude.

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:44 am
by peter dragon
:lol:

hey ill take winning the NC by 35.
just because I dont want tosu to lose 2 nc's in a row... ;)

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:04 am
by RadioFan
Dude, if BC wins out, I WANT them to get beat by 60 by tOSU.

Seriously.

It would be a fitting ending for an awesome season under an absolutely fucking retarded system.

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:58 am
by RadioFan
9. UNRACK fucking KAL, and that fraud, Jeff Tedford. What is that now, coach? 3 in a row? FUCK YOU.

By way of BCS logic, it's become obviously clear that ASU should play BC for the REAL National Championship.

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:05 am
by Shoalzie
RadioFan wrote:Dude, if BC wins out, I WANT them to get beat by 60 by tOSU.

Seriously.

It would be a fitting ending for an awesome season under an absolutely fucking retarded system.

I think as time has gone on this season, the Buckeyes are at least making more a case for them to be a top ranked team when they post convincing wins in the Big Ten. It's like they're eeking by...they are winning handedly. To win by 20 in Happy Valley is no easy task. You can still debate they aren't necessarily the unquestionable #1 team in America but they are at least one of the top 3 teams. You have to give it to them for simply not stubbing their toe in a game when this has been such a topsy-turvy season.

BC is a team that deserves a shot at the national title but I don't think they should be handed the "Go to the Title Game" card after the season is over. The Eagles could very easily run into VaTech again in the ACC title game if the Hokies win out.

Watching this season, I'm convinced there has to be 8-team playoff after the regular season is over. I liked the idea of 16 teams before it doesn't make sense to give teams with 2 or 3 losses a shot at the title if you want to keep some integrity in the regular season and it puts more emphasis on winning the conference. Let's take virtually the same format for the BCS...6 major conference champs and 2 at-larges but put in an exemption for any non-BCS conference unbeatens to receive an at-large bid. Use a BCS-like formula to rank the 6 conference champion teams and the two at-large teams would automatically receive the #7 and #8 regardless of if they have better rating than any of the major conference champs.

The bottom line with this format...you need to win your conference and most importantly, just win your damn games and earn your way to the playoff. Take as much of the decision-making out of play and leave it strictly to the results on the field. If you take conference champs, then you can't debate over what the standings say...you win and you're in. It would make conference championship weekend a lot more exciting as well. Instead of winning a berth to a non-title BCS game...why not make it worth a spot in a playoff?

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:29 am
by RadioFan
Shoalzie wrote:the Buckeyes are at least making more a case for them to be a top ranked team
Not saying they aren't, but think about this:

They are a worse team than they were last year, only there's a real possibility they'll play somebody like BC, this year, instead of some team like an "undeserving Florida."

A 3-loss Florida team this year is a better opponent for tOSU than fucking BC.

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:35 am
by Jimmy Medalions
RF you are pissing me off tonight!

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:40 am
by peter dragon
stat that may interest only me...

tOSU didnt punt once during the entire game last night.. WOW!
OHIO ST DRIVE CHART

Field Goal
Touchdown
Touchdown
Intercepted Pass
End of Half
Touchdown
Field Goal
Touchdown
Touchdown
End of Game

Re: Week 9:

Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:28 pm
by MuchoBulls
RadioFan wrote:3. UNRACK South Florida. Connecticut? Are you fucking kidding me?
I put out an APB for my team because what I have seen the last 2 weeks is much too familiar. I thought we had turned the corner, but the undisciplined play, untimely and bad penalties, and atrocious play calling and execution have creeped back in to this program.

UConn is not a good team and we had no business losing to them. Rutgers, Cincinnati, and WVU are going to roll that team.

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:40 am
by RadioFan
Jimmy Medalions wrote:RF you are pissing me off tonight!
If it makes you feel any better, your boys this year are better than that fucking fraud, BC, as well.

Re: Week 9:

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:57 am
by RadioFan
MuchoBulls wrote:UConn is not a good team and we had no business losing to them. Rutgers, Cincinnati, and WVU are going to roll that team.
What really worries me is that Toddowen might discover Connecticut has a football team.

:lol:

I hope you're right, Mucho.

10. FUCK UCONN.

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:12 am
by L45B
Shoalzie wrote:Watching this season, I'm convinced there has to be 8-team playoff after the regular season is over. I liked the idea of 16 teams before it doesn't make sense to give teams with 2 or 3 losses a shot at the title if you want to keep some integrity in the regular season and it puts more emphasis on winning the conference. Let's take virtually the same format for the BCS...6 major conference champs and 2 at-larges but put in an exemption for any non-BCS conference unbeatens to receive an at-large bid. Use a BCS-like formula to rank the 6 conference champion teams and the two at-large teams would automatically receive the #7 and #8 regardless of if they have better rating than any of the major conference champs.

The bottom line with this format...you need to win your conference and most importantly, just win your damn games and earn your way to the playoff. Take as much of the decision-making out of play and leave it strictly to the results on the field. If you take conference champs, then you can't debate over what the standings say...you win and you're in. It would make conference championship weekend a lot more exciting as well. Instead of winning a berth to a non-title BCS game...why not make it worth a spot in a playoff?
RACK THE HELL OUTTA THIS! This is exactly what CFB needs to go to. 16 teams, as I've argued before, is too many. But under an 8-team format, the winners of the BCS conferences are guaranteed a chance to play for the NC, as it should be. And the rest have to pray they get in. I also like the idea of home-field advantage (until the final game) as opposed to playing games at bowl sites.