
i'd hit it, even with all that fukkin pink. shit drives me nuts.
Moderator: Dinsdale
Word. Paula's a regular here at the Rochester LPGA event. Her pairing is always a must see. Second on my priority list only to Lorena's group. If we're lucky, next year they'll be in the final group together like they were in 2005 when Ochoa went bonkers on the back 9 and made up 7 strokes on Paula in 7 holes.Screw_Michigan wrote:won $150k at the tournament of champions sunday in mobile.
i'd hit it, even with all that fukkin pink. shit drives me nuts.
Tough to disagree with anything here.........nice work, Dins!!Dinsdale wrote:I'd possibly vote for Gulbis, but
A) As mentioned, she sucks. Natalie Kornikova needs to do a little better on the links
B) According to our local radio honks who've spent time with her, she is nothing like the image she portrays. Although those guys were on the air, so they stopped short of using the word "cunt"... but just barely. And those guys are pretty easy on judging character and whatnot.
C) Her new hiring of a PR firm to revamp her image, transforming her into a "role model" for teens is outright hilarious. Bitch already sent the message that if you can't win fair and square, you make up the difference by flaunting your moneymaker... priceless.
Nice job, whore.
IndyFrisco wrote:SM,
What do you mean by the Wie situation? I haven't kept up on the ladies as of late.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
I don’t think it’s fair to compare Gulbis to Kournikova. Gulbis doesn’t have the slut factor going for her that Kournikova did. I haven’t seen any upskirt shots of Natalie yet (if somebody has, can you please hook a brotha’ up), and she wasn’t allegedly fucking a pro hockey player when she was 16.Dinsdale wrote:I'd possibly vote for Gulbis, but
A) As mentioned, she sucks. Natalie Kornikova needs to do a little better on the links
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Not in places that appreciate the game. Places like Rochester and Toledo could give a crap about "poster girls" like Michele Wie and Natalie Gulbis unless they can provide some game to back up the hype. Here in Rochester, the LPGA draws 20,000 plus a day on the weekend and Annika hasn't played here in 3 years and Wie has yet to play. I've seen Gulbis' galleries here, and they're no more impressive than those for say Christina Kim. But in the softer markets, where people just don't care that much about women's golf, players like Wie and Gulbis draw galleries that are very disproportionate to the game they bring to those tournaments. At least that what I see every time I catch a tournament on the television.Screw_Michigan wrote:wie hasn't been the tour's #1 draw since she started shitting the bed every weekend.BSmack wrote:But I would have laughed my ass off had Carolyn Bivens been forced to chose between upholding the rules or cutting out the tour's #1 draw from the remainder of the schedule.
not to nitpick, but the USGA wouldn't have anything to do with it. the LPGA maybe. the PGA and LPGA are the professional associations that run the tours. the USGA is primarily a rules association that hosts some national events like the US Open, US Amateur etc....it has no other necessary connection with professional golf. it's the US version of the Royal and Ancient across the pond.Screw_Michigan wrote:
i think gulbis' got a lot of pressure from the establishment in the usga to cut back her "racy" (:meds:) photo shoots.
RULES motherfu*ker....Screw_Michigan wrote:and i forgot to mention that cristie kerr is a smoking babe as well.
She wasn't a bitch to my father in-law this week when she signed his hand during the pro-am. Just saying that in Rochester, the galleries trend towards those who are playing well, past champions (especially Nancy Lopez) and certain hole locations. I've yet to see an LPGA player who wasn't anything but gracious and appreciative towards the galleries. And that includes Gulbis.The Seer wrote:The LPGA is trying to deal with the PR nightmare of having half their tour become no personality adroid machines named Lee, Park, or Kim and y'all are dissing eye candy cuz she might be a bitch?
With that form? I doubt it. Though the pink ball could throw you off for a moment.Dinsdale wrote:Damn, I'm glad you pointed that out, Mucho. Otherwise, that pic could easily be confused for that one of Ken hitting 3 wood on the Par 3.
http://thehaternation.blogspot.com/2008 ... em_29.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;# Paula Creamer has to be pretty happy that Michelle Wie is playing so terribly, that it's taking some of the heat off of her choking. Well, as much heat that women's golf attracts. But seriously, when it comes to the majors, Creamer is like Phil Mickelson with a smaller rack.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
are you fucking kidding me a 60?!?!?!?IndyFrisco wrote: Started off with a 60
The smaller rack blast was good for a chuckle, but Paula Creamer is 21 years old. Same age that Tiger won his first major. I’d cut her a little slack.BSmack wrote:This in from The Hater Nation.
http://thehaternation.blogspot.com/2008 ... em_29.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;# Paula Creamer has to be pretty happy that Michelle Wie is playing so terribly, that it's taking some of the heat off of her choking. Well, as much heat that women's golf attracts. But seriously, when it comes to the majors, Creamer is like Phil Mickelson with a smaller rack.
I followed Creamer and Ochoa a few years back during the final round at the Rochester Tournament when Creamer gave up a 5 stroke lead with 7 holes to play to lose to Ochoa by 4. Though she may well grow out of it, so far history shows Creamer folds when good players put pressure on her.Goober McTuber wrote:The smaller rack blast was good for a chuckle, but Paula Creamer is 21 years old. Same age that Tiger won his first major. I’d cut her a little slack.BSmack wrote:This in from The Hater Nation.
http://thehaternation.blogspot.com/2008 ... em_29.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;# Paula Creamer has to be pretty happy that Michelle Wie is playing so terribly, that it's taking some of the heat off of her choking. Well, as much heat that women's golf attracts. But seriously, when it comes to the majors, Creamer is like Phil Mickelson with a smaller rack.
A few years ago? Like when she was 18? She choked away a tournament at age 18? The horror. She was unbeaten in five matches last year in the Solheim Cup. Yes, she had a bad final round in the Open this year, and you saw her choke one away when she was 18, but I haven’t seen this huge history of choking that you speak of.BSmack wrote:I followed Creamer and Ochoa a few years back during the final round at the Rochester Tournament when Creamer gave up a 5 stroke lead with 7 holes to play to lose to Ochoa by 4. Though she may well grow out of it, so far history shows Creamer folds when good players put pressure on her.Goober McTuber wrote: The smaller rack blast was good for a chuckle, but Paula Creamer is 21 years old. Same age that Tiger won his first major. I’d cut her a little slack.