T1B

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:31 pm**

SOUTHWORTH, Wash. (AP) - A man trying to loosen a stubborn lug nut blasted the wheel with a 12-gauge shotgun, injuring himself badly in both legs, sheriff's deputies said.

The 66-year-old man had been repairing a Lincoln Continental for two weeks at his home northwest of Southworth, about 10 miles southwest of Seattle, and had gotten all but one of the lug nuts off the right rear wheel by Saturday afternoon, Kitsap County Deputy Scott Wilson said.

"He's bound and determined to get that lug nut off," Wilson said.

From about arm's length, the man fired the shotgun at the wheel and was "peppered" in both legs with buckshot and debris, with some injuries as high as his chin, according to a sheriff's office report.

"Nobody else was there, and he wasn't intoxicated," Wilson said.

The man was taken to Tacoma General Hospital with injuries Wilson described as severe but not life-threatening.

What's worse -- maiming yourself with a shotgun, or doing it with a camera?

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:33 pm**

Was he wearing women's underwear at the time?

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:43 pm**

Cuda wrote:Was he wearing women's underwear at the time?

Very important detail there..

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:45 pm**

Was he taken to the hospital by his hot 27-yr-old g/f?

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:52 pm**

Was he handicapped by an astigmatism? All good, pertinent questions.

Or, we could just assume that AP's the bigger of the two tards. Really, is there any question?

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:57 pm**

mvscal wrote:No, not really. The decision to photograph yourself prancing about in women's underwear and then make said photo availbale on the internet requires a chain of imbecility that far exceeds a snap, enraged decision to blast your tire with a shotgun.

RACK teh take

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:58 pm**

Ken wrote:we could just assume that AP's the bigger of the two tards. Really, is there any question?

Once motive is taken into account, there really isn't. At least dude w/ shotgun was trying to do something that needed to be done. Sure, his method was questionable. But at least in his case, no one has to ask, "Why?"

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:24 pm**

AP told us why, the 27 year old hottie asked him to do it, and I believe him.

But what we don't know yet is whether his hottie looks like this

or this

So he's gotta post a pic of the hottie.

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:31 pm**

pron wrote:AP told us why, the 27 year old hottie asked him to do it, and I believe him.

Okay, so now we have a motive for each. With tht said, knowingly amputating one's dignity w/an image trumps that of amputation by stupidity.

AP wins.

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:54 pm**

pron wrote:AP told us why, the 27 year old hottie asked him to do it

That answers why he snapped the pic, but not why he sent it to anyone but her/him. There's still a question hanging about why he would be compelled to share it with ...anyone.

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:50 pm**

The most disturbing part is that it was a mystery to him how it got out. That has to mean it was sent to more than one person.

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 7:13 pm**

I read somewhere that he sent the photos to Cinderella_Undercover ....... but is C_U a female, or a Wendy Lou Who II?

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 7:19 pm**

Smackie Chan wrote: his hot 27-yr-old g/f?

Any chick with underwear the width of a freeway on ramp cannot be labeled "Hot" unless she's on fire.

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:07 pm**

Mister Bushice wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote: his hot 27-yr-old g/f?
Any chick with underwear the width of a freeway on ramp cannot be labeled "Hot" unless she's on fire.

No!!!

Not...

...BlondieBabe?

Pardon me while I throw up in my mouth

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:21 pm**

Mister Bushice wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote: his hot 27-yr-old g/f?
Any chick with underwear the width of a freeway on ramp cannot be labeled "Hot" unless she's on fire.

Maybe AP's ass is just smaller than you think.

Nah.

Posted: **Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:37 pm**

mvscal wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:There's still a question hanging about why he would be compelled to share it with ...anyone.
It must have seemed like a good idea at the time. (11AM after a fifth of vodka)

FTFY

Posted: **Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:51 am**

mvscal wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:There's still a question hanging about why he would be compelled to share it with ...anyone.
It must have seemed like a good idea at the time. (4AM after a fifth of vodka)

Dude -- we're talking about a guy who admitted to being a zero with the ladies, until at age 40, Rayduh James taught him "game"... over the internet.

And for those who missed it -- yes, he's fully admitted this.

I'm just wondering exactly how pathetic this guy is, that some stranger calling him a "crust infested cock garage" on the internet 1400 times actually improved his game with the ladies.

Paints quite the picture, don't it?

Posted: **Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:17 am**

Dinsdale wrote:
Dude -- we're talking about a guy who admitted to being a zero with the ladies, until at age 40, Rayduh James taught him "game"... over the internet.

And for those who missed it -- yes, he's fully admitted this.

Wait...are you telling me that in all my years of busting on zz, nobody bothered to hook me up with that ammo?

Link....PLEASE!

Posted: **Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:15 pm**

I think I'm finally starting to figure this out.

AP: James, I need ass. How do I get it?
RJ: spike your hair and have cuda spunk on your sportcoat.
AP: I don't know - have anything else for me?
RJ: take a pic of yourself in your granny's panties and email it to SG.

Posted: **Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:12 pm**

R-Jack wrote: Step 3. Bring coke

Posted: **Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:43 pm**

T1B

Bigger Tard -- AP or this guy?

Bigger Tard -- AP or this guy?