Maybe this is why Trent Lott packed up and left DC?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:21 pm

Because he's gay as hell?

http://bigheaddc.com/2007/11/26/trent-l ... -too-much/

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:01 pm

Please say you knew

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:11 pm

I never cared enough to notice. Though right about now, I'm just going to automatically assume that every GOP lawmaker is gay until proven otherwise.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:27 pm

BSmack wrote:I'm just going to automatically assume that every GOP lawmaker is gay until proven otherwise.

Don't be silly.

It's only the ones who are shouting anti-gay rhetoric from the rooftops as a campaign plank that are gay.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:54 am

The anal lube lobby on the Hill exerts it's influence to bury stories like this once again.

I swear, they are worse than AIPAC.

upstart · Post by **upstart** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:36 pm

this is gonna sound weird but i hope the allegations are at least true. i mean i can see some militant gays using the opportunity to attack someone with false stories. it really would be incredibly easy and if its not true its a pretty horrible thing to do to the guy

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:08 pm

No lack of fags in DC...they're all Dems, though.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:04 pm

Someone being gay in DC is only newsworthy if they are a Republican. And now, apearantly, if they know someone who is gay, they must be as well.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Sun Dec 09, 2007 3:11 pm

Diogenes wrote:Someone being gay in DC is only newsworthy if they are a Republican. And now, apearantly, if they know someone who is gay, they must be as well.

The truth of the matter is that’s it’s generally newsworthy based on the individual’s voting record on legislation that impacts gays. Moron.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:56 pm

So if someone supports the 70%+ of Americans who oppose gay 'marriage', and knows a homosexual, that makes them a valid target?

Good to know.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:08 pm

So, how many do you "know"?

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:33 pm

Mikey wrote:So, how many do you "know"?

Aside from you?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:15 pm

mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:The truth of the matter is that’s it’s generally newsworthy based on the individual’s voting record on legislation that impacts gays. Moron.
And all this time I thought legislators were supposed to be representing the views of their constituents. I had no idea they were supposed to be voting in lockstep with the fag agenda the whole time.

I’m just saying that if they consistently vote in a way that negatively impacts gays, it’s probably gonna be news when they show up with fresh stains on their pretty blue frocks.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:49 pm

mvscal wrote:And all this time I thought legislators were supposed to be representing the views of their constituents.

Where is that in the Constitution?

I had no idea they were supposed to be voting in lockstep with the fag agenda the whole time.

It's a matter of poor judgment as well as hypocrisy. That and we all know that there is no way in hell these men would have ever been elected were they openly gay Republicans.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:01 pm

So is a recovering alcoholic a hypocrite if he favors restrictions on alcohol? Or only if he has a relapse?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:03 pm

No, he's a hypocrite if he lies about it.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:14 pm

BSmack wrote:No, he's a hypocrite if he lies about it.

No, that just makes him a politician.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:51 pm

Strange how, when cornered, mvscal immediately reverts to tossing out red herrings.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:09 pm

mvscal wrote:Where is the red herring? Craig is a faggot. That is his personal life and should have nothing to do with the legislation he supports, right? Isn't that the way it was supposed to work? Or does it only work that way when a Democratic President is ejaculating on the help in the Oval Office?

That would be option B) And only if he is a Dem.

Ask Robert Packwood.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:20 pm

mvscal wrote:Where is the red herring?

The red herring is all over your posts. It's your standard MO when confronted by indefensible behavior on the part of a GOP partisan to immediately attack on a completely different front. Sorry, it's not working.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:37 pm

That's a good little lefty. Spin and punt.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:05 pm

mvscal wrote:Link to this alleged "indefensible behavior."

Consorting with prostitutes is usually way up there on the list of no-no's.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:17 pm

BSmack wrote:
mvscal wrote:Link to this alleged "indefensible behavior."
Consorting with prostitutes is usually way up there on the list of no-no's.

Unless your name is Barney Frank. Besides, mearly having an aquaintance is not the same as 'consorting'. Unless you're a Republican, I guess.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:35 pm

Diogenes wrote:
BSmack wrote:
mvscal wrote:Link to this alleged "indefensible behavior."
Consorting with prostitutes is usually way up there on the list of no-no's.
Unless your name is Barney Frank. Besides, mearly having an aquaintance is not the same as 'consorting'. Unless you're a Republican, I guess.

Frank at least came out of the closet. Something Lott, Craig and all the other members of the Log Closet Society will never do willingly.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:50 pm

BSmack wrote:No, he's a hypocrite if he lies about it.

Do you even know what the fuck "hypocrisy" is?

Trent Lott may be addicted to cock whle being opposed to gay marriage but that doesn't make him a hypocrite; he'd only be a hypocrite if he said it was ok for himself to suck cock, but not for you.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:54 pm

Cuda wrote:Trent Lott may be addicted to cock whle being opposed to gay marriage but that doesn't make him a hypocrite; he'd only be a hypocrite if he said it was ok for himself to suck cock, but not for you.

Through both his actions and his rhetoric, that is exactly what he has said.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:55 pm

BSmack wrote:
Cuda wrote:Trent Lott may be addicted to cock whle being opposed to gay marriage but that doesn't make him a hypocrite; he'd only be a hypocrite if he said it was ok for himself to suck cock, but not for you.
Through both his actions and his rhetoric, that is exactly what he has said.

He hasn't said or done anything of the sort.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:15 pm

Trent Lott on homosexuals circa 1998.

"It is [a sin]....You should try to show them a way to deal with that problem, just like alcohol...or sex addiction...or kleptomaniacs." - Senate Republican Leader Trent Lott, Associated Press, June 15, 1998.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:39 pm

mvscal wrote:Who the fuck says Lott is queer

His rent-boy said his dick tasted like shit.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:46 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
mvscal wrote:Who the fuck says Lott is queer
His rent-boy said his dick tasted like shit.

Maybe he was just experimenting.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:49 pm

Mikey wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
mvscal wrote:Who the fuck says Lott is queer
His rent-boy said his dick tasted like shit.
Maybe he was just experimenting.

Nah, it was a "youthful indiscretion".

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:11 pm

mvscal wrote:So some fag said Lott is queer? That's all you've got?

Actually some fag said he met Lott.

That's all the left needs to prove he's a polesmoker.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:01 am

BSmack wrote:
Cuda wrote:Trent Lott may be addicted to cock whle being opposed to gay marriage but that doesn't make him a hypocrite; he'd only be a hypocrite if he said it was ok for himself to suck cock, but not for you.
Through both his actions and his rhetoric, that is exactly what he has said.

Trent said it was ok for him to suck cock, but not ok for you?

Got a link?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:42 am

Cuda wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Cuda wrote:Trent Lott may be addicted to cock whle being opposed to gay marriage but that doesn't make him a hypocrite; he'd only be a hypocrite if he said it was ok for himself to suck cock, but not for you.
Through both his actions and his rhetoric, that is exactly what he has said.
Trent said it was ok for him to suck cock, but not ok for you?

Got a link?

Fair enough. I shouldn't assume that Trent is a catcher. It is possible he likes to pitch.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:31 am

BSmack wrote:Trent Lott on homosexuals circa 1998.

"It is [a sin]....You should try to show them a way to deal with that problem, just like alcohol...or sex addiction...or kleptomaniacs." - Senate Republican Leader Trent Lott, Associated Press, June 15, 1998.

and your point is? believe it or not, there are a few bazillion behaviors one can partake in and at the same time think they are wrong. also, believe it or not, it is possible to be a fag, but be against fag marriage.

if lot is shown to be a fag who secretly ran off to ptown and got hitched to barney then tried to block others from doing the same, he is a hypocrite. kinda like the zillions of folks who used to think that sexual harrassement was the wrost thing ever till willy got caught doing it.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:36 pm

smackaholic wrote:kinda like the zillions of folks who used to think that sexual harrassement was the wrost thing ever till willy got caught doing it.

Just curious if you’ve ever made it through a day in the past 15 years without thinking about Bill Clinton?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:17 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
smackaholic wrote:kinda like the zillions of folks who used to think that sexual harrassement was the wrost thing ever till willy got caught doing it.
Just curious if you’ve ever made it through a day in the past 15 years without thinking about Bill Clinton?

"I don't get it?"

Sincerely, Wolf Diaper.

Terry in Crapchester · Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:43 pm

mvscal wrote:Who the fuck says Lott is queer and why should anybody believe it?

Well, he was a college cheerleader.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:31 pm

Male Cheerleader= Gay as a Ungaro Spring Frock

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:55 pm

Cuda wrote:Male Cheerleader= Gay as a Ungaro Spring Frock

WERD!!!!!

Sin,