Page 1 of 2
Should RtS be banned FOREVER?
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:40 pm
by PSUFAN
Make your voices heard, you felchonauts.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:43 pm
by Dinsdale
Install a script that logs him out every other minute.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:44 pm
by The Whistle Is Screaming
Permanent, unequivocal, unforgiving ban
Even if it were for entertainment purposes only (it's not, but just saying).
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:51 pm
by PSUFAN
If you voted for sudden-death stipulations, what would those be?
-no personal info posting
-no LYING
-no horseshit in 9:07 chat
-oil down those fucking wheelchair axles
-don't be shedding hairshirt/blood droplets everywhere
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:52 pm
by Wolfman
I'm wondering what Sirfindafold's thoughts might be !
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:13 pm
by RevLimiter
For those of us not up to speed, explain why the hammer might be dropped on the little guy.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:17 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
RevLimiter wrote:For those of us not up to speed, explain why the hammer might be dropped on the little guy.
I don't know all the details, but I do know that he was giving out personal information without permission of other posters.
Not condoning that by any stretch of the imagination, but lots of posters in here have done that and gotten away with it. I'm not entirely sure why the double standard was employed, or alternatively, why Roger's violations were so much more severe than those of other posters.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:36 pm
by RumpleForeskin
Is RtS the full nic or is it an acronym for his nic? If the latter, then what is this douche's full nic?
What I've heard what happened to Dog at lwm is still unforgiveable. I think the same thing happened between two people at the originial SC. My facts could be a little fuzzy, but I think that is what happened at SC, right?
Either way, its inexcusable.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:47 pm
by BSmack
RumpleForeskin wrote:Is RtS the full nic or is it an acronym for his nic? If the latter, then what is this douche's full nic?
What I've heard what happened to Dog at lwm is still unforgiveable. I think the same thing happened between two people at the originial SC. My facts could be a little fuzzy, but I think that is what happened at SC, right?
Either way, its inexcusable.
WTF? What happened to Dog? Did somebody beat him over the head and make him draft a horrible FFL team or something?
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:51 pm
by RumpleForeskin
BSmack wrote:WTF? What happened to Dog?
Jackie was reading other members PMs and I think one of Dog's PMs said some shit about her that she did not take to kindly to, so she called his boss...or something like that.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:54 pm
by Slasher
cut his nuts
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:59 pm
by RevLimiter
I'm going to need more information before I make my decision....what I'd REALLY like is for the Reindeer trolls to weigh in on this topic. That would help things a bunch.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:03 pm
by PSUFAN
I'm going to need more information before I make my decision
Translation - my CTRL key is busted, ASSHOLES.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:07 pm
by RevLimiter
PSUFAN wrote:I'm going to need more information before I make my decision
Translation - my CTRL key is busted, ASSHOLES.
Not much Xmas spirit in THAT post.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:15 pm
by Cuda
mvscal wrote:
I would vote for random bannings for purely arbitrary reasons.
We're talking about Shrubber, not bbqjones
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:21 pm
by KC Scott
mvscal wrote:Not permanent and unequivocal. Give him just a faint ray of hope to keep him begging.
I like this idea...
Give him one hour per week - say Sunday night at 9:07 pm
Sort of like the mandatory excercise on death row
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:33 pm
by RumpleForeskin
Oh, the idiot in the wheelchair? Oh yeah, axe that low life. Better yet, give me his physical address and I will mail him a soccer ball.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:36 pm
by KC Scott
And only allow him one post per topic.
And make his avatar this....
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:39 pm
by RumpleForeskin
KC Scott wrote:And only allow him one post per topic.
And make his avatar this....
Holy shit!
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:48 pm
by KC Scott
I like this one too....
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:51 pm
by BSmack
KC Scott wrote:And only allow him one post per topic.
And make his avatar this....
It would make more sense if he were gobbling pills.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:27 pm
by KC Scott
BSmack wrote:
It would make more sense if he were gobbling pills.
Maybe it could be a metophor for kicking his Vicodin habit
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:28 pm
by RevLimiter
Gee....I'd sure hate to get on you guys' BAD side.
Yikes.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:56 pm
by BSmack
KC Scott wrote:BSmack wrote:
It would make more sense if he were gobbling pills.
Maybe it could be a metophor for kicking his Vicodin habit
Then it would be more like this...
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:06 pm
by ChargerMike
...look, we've lost enough of the "good" posters already because of some overlording.. I won't mention any names
was' up Otis? Losing Luther was just about the last straw, I've about had it with this outfit.
..ya follow?
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:09 pm
by Dinsdale
ChargerMike wrote:I've about had it with this outfit...ya follow?
People who post every blue moon, and when they do, are flat-out painful to read...
issuing ultimatums?
Freaking priceless.
Take Paul with you.
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:35 pm
by ChargerMike
^^^^^ :xxxl:'sdale speaks!
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:48 pm
by Dog
BSmack wrote:RumpleForeskin wrote:Is RtS the full nic or is it an acronym for his nic? If the latter, then what is this douche's full nic?
What I've heard what happened to Dog at lwm is still unforgiveable. I think the same thing happened between two people at the originial SC. My facts could be a little fuzzy, but I think that is what happened at SC, right?
Either way, its inexcusable.
WTF? What happened to Dog? Did somebody beat him over the head and make him draft a horrible FFL team or something?
It's all Felix's fault. He told me that the best strategy was to dump all $200 on Manning and let the pickbot fill out the rest of my team with role players. Never should have listened to him.
Regarding Jackie in Wichita and the whole livewithmom fiasco, well Rumps is sorta right. Jackie didn't take to kindly to me outing her as a carpet muncher. But, live and learn. Most women who want to play with the big boys are bull dykes with grudges anyways, sup Annie?
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:54 pm
by Dinsdale
ChargerMike wrote:^^^^^ :xxxl:'sdale speaks!
Priceless.
My track record for bringing the funny around here is beyond question.
You brought some epic "spamsdale" smack to the table.
Who's the "spammer," douchebag?
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 11:59 pm
by Dog
ChargerMike wrote:...look, we've lost enough of the "good" posters already because of some overlording.. I won't mention any names
was' up Otis? Losing Luther was just about the last straw, I've about had it with this outfit.
..ya follow?
.
Sure. Meet me over at Mag7.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:02 am
by ChargerMike
Dinsdale wrote:ChargerMike wrote:^^^^^ :xxxl:'sdale speaks!
Priceless.
My track record for bringing the funny around here is beyond question.
You brought some epic "spamsdale" smack to the table.
Who's the "spammer," douchebag?
...someone approaching 16,000 posts or someone just over 3,000? I wonder!...scoreboard..you win
..step in it much?
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:44 am
by Dinsdale
So, after having devoting a post to absolutely nothing except for the sake of running that pretty clever "spamsdale" line...
You set out to prove your worth with...
post total smack.
Awesome.
I eagerly await the "you work at McDonalds" that's sure to follow.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:49 am
by Adelpiero
Who?
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:20 am
by poptart
I was of the understanding that Rog was already banned forever.
Or did he have, like, a 2 year sentence, and this thread is his parole hearing?
If such is the case, let him log on and have his say.
If he doesn't show up with a swastika on his forehead then perhaps he's got his little personal thing together.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:41 am
by Smackie Chan
poptart wrote:let him log on and have his say.
Ulterior motive much? You just want someone new to run, admit it.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:42 am
by KC Scott
You can tell JSC is a flaming liberal.
I'm sure he's anti-death penalty as well.
Yes... what a fine board we'd have with RTS, Annie, Kaley, and John Wyane Gacy posting at will.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:48 am
by Smackie Chan
Jsc810 wrote:
I took that photo of him, that was a plunger that I caught during a Mardi Gras parade
Quit coverin' for Scott. I was there, and that was his dose cup disguised as an innocent plunger.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:52 am
by RevLimiter
Smackie Chan wrote:poptart wrote:let him log on and have his say.
Ulterior motive much? You just want someone new to run, admit it.
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:12 am
by RevLimiter
Jsc810 wrote:KC Scott wrote:You can tell JSC is a flaming liberal.
I'm sure he's anti-death penalty as well.
I may be the most pro-death penalty person on these boards. My name was on the list for witnesses for Louisiana's next execution, but I suspect with a new governor, I'm going to have to try again.
Louisiana has had a few serial killers over the past few years, and I knew some of the victims. I can't begin to describe the full range of emotions that had to be held back when I saw that pathetic piece of shit Derrick Todd Lee in his cell on Death Row.
I don't feel like thinking or writing about this shit now. Fuck you.
He sure told YOU, Scott!
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:19 am
by orcinus
Wait ... Dinsdale works at McDonalds?