T1B

Posted: **Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:28 pm**

The Chargers have won their last 8 games.
The Patriots have won their last 17.

The Chargers were spanked by the Patriots in week 2.

Do the Chargers have a prayer?

Posted: **Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:33 pm**

This is a very different team than the one that got beaten in week 2.

(Did I just hear Dierdork say that?)

Posted: **Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:34 pm**

Without Rivers or LT....fuggedabotit....

Posted: **Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:41 pm**

The Seer wrote:Without Rivers or LT....fuggedabotit....

Don't be surprised if they're both ready by then.

What was Volek's QB rating today, BTW?

Posted: **Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:51 pm**

Mikey wrote:This is a very different team than the one that got beaten in week 2.

And the one that got beaten by KC early in the season. I'm still scratching my head over that one.

Can't believe that I'm about to type this, but since I can't stand the Pats...

GO CHARGERS!!!

Posted: **Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:54 pm**

Tom Brady and the gang are playing far to well to lose.

Posted: **Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:08 pm**

Patriots are DESTINED to run the table. The sooner you haters figure this out the better.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:03 am**

I had hoped the Colts won,but as the Ref's kept kissing their ass all through the game I found myself pulling for the Cry Babies.O well,in a week LT will feel
disrespected after the Pats blow out the bolts once again.

Pats..... 42

bolts..... crying

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:08 am**

Congrats to the Blots for winning their super bowl today.

Didn't see it, but all I can imagine is that Trev put X in the clot gatorade

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:58 pm**

RevLimiter wrote:Patriots are DESTINED to run the table. The sooner you haters figure this out the better.

..rack the av. Paul...sniff, sniff, that's my quaterback, sniff

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:10 pm**

Can't stand the Blots, but hate the Patriots even more.

I though Indy would be the best team to beat the Pats again, if Marvin Harrison is healthy. Hopefully the Blots can get to Brady and knock him out of the game.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:28 pm**

I don't hate the Pats nor do I hate the Blots. If I had to lean one way, I'd probably cheer for the Pats just because my sister-in-law is from New England and she is cool.

Go Pats :/

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:08 pm**

mvscal wrote:
RumpleForeskin wrote: I'd probably cheer for the Pats just because my sister-in-law is from New England and my wife will sit on me if I don't.

Go Pats :/
Fixed

That's why I switched

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:13 pm**

mvscal wrote:
RumpleForeskin wrote: I'd probably cheer for the Pats just because my sister-in-law is from New England and my wife will sit on me if I don't.

Go Pats :/
Fixed

I hope Mrs. Rumps sits on my face. Will be good.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:21 pm**

RumpleForeskin wrote:I hope Mrs. Rumps sits on my face. Will be good.

Why do you hate Oxygen?

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:35 pm**

mvscal wrote:But you have so much to live for! Well...maybe not so much.

It wouldn't suck dying...well...you know sucking a vag.

Maybe you don't know. Sorry.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:40 pm**

RumpleForeskin wrote:
mvscal wrote:But you have so much to live for! Well...maybe not so much.

It wouldn't suck dying...well...you know sucking a vag.

Or in your case, vice versa.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:48 pm**

Don;t forget to factor in that the fatties are quite prone to malodorous remnants getting stuck in the creases and emitting their special brand of stonk throughout their halflife.

It's the inherent problem with logging facetime on a chunker.

Or so I've heard.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:59 pm**

While the two of you are trading pre-meditated vocab and handjobs on each other, my junk will be riding between Mrs. Rumps' Cascades.

Posted: **Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:24 pm**

And even getting a hummer brings up the possibility of regurgitated cud, which would cause some vascular migration the likes of which not even a case of Viagra and a PM from c_u requesting forced anal could overcome.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:54 am**

mvscal wrote:
RumpleForeskin wrote:While the two of you are trading pre-meditated vocab and handjobs on each other, my junk will be riding between Mrs. Rumps' Cascades.
Sure the huge mellons are nice and I could work around the ginormous ass...barely, but her Wade Philips looking greel is the real show stopper. Doesn't it ever kind of freak you out a little?

Wow....just, WOW.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:52 am**

War Wagon wrote:Can't believe that I'm about to type this, but since I can't stand the Pats...

GO CHARGERS!!!

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:02 pm**

RadioFan wrote:
War Wagon wrote:Can't believe that I'm about to type this, but since I can't stand the Pats...

GO CHARGERS!!!

This warms my heart. You can sit right next to me. Win or lose, I'll be laughing at Ucan't for saying the only team that scares him is Indy.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:10 pm**

trev wrote:Win or lose, I'll be laughing at Ucan't for saying the only team that scares him is Indy.

Why? Your shit franchise doesn't scare me in the least. Certain teams match up better against New England than others. The Colts can take advantage of our weaknesses on defense better than SD can. The Chargers don't have the QB nor the receivers that Indy does. The Colts also have shown on ability to slow down NE's offense, while your sieve of a D has been exposed by Brady and Co the last two times out. Furthermore, good luck with beating NE without Gates, LC, or Cryin'...

Even when your shit team gets pounded this weekend you'll "still laugh at me?" Is that before or after you call the Chargers' suicide hotline?

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:18 pm**

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Furthermore, good luck with beating NE without Gates, LC, or Cryin'...

Who is this "LC" cat you keep referring to? Was he just signed off the Bolts' practice squad? Was he a free agent? Whoever he is, you sure seem to think that he's some kind of a player for them.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:22 pm**

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
trev wrote: The Chargers don't have the QB nor the receivers that Indy does.

AJ Feeley
Greg Lewis

2 players who couldn't start for ANY NFL team nor can Lewis even crack the #3 WR spot yet both made the Patriots secondary look like shit before Feeley remembered he's a backup NFL QB who has no business picking apart the Patriots defense.

In other words- if AJ Feeley can have a decent game against the Patriots with shit receivers, Rivers can do the same with a substantially better receiving corp.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:28 pm**

Nice rant, except that AJ Feeley is better than CryMeA Rivers.

Feeley belongs on a Wheaties box compared to Phillip Leaf.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:48 pm**

jiminphilly wrote:
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
trev wrote: The Chargers don't have the QB nor the receivers that Indy does.
AJ Feeley
Greg Lewis

2 players who couldn't start for ANY NFL team nor can Lewis even crack the #3 WR spot yet both made the Patriots secondary look like shit before Feeley remembered he's a backup NFL QB who has no business picking apart the Patriots defense.

In other words- if AJ Feeley can have a decent game against the Patriots with shit receivers, Rivers can do the same with a substantially better receiving corp.

I love how people keep bringing up two road games in the middle of a mostly meaningless December. Keep believing you have a chance because of what you saw in these games. While you do that the Pats will be winning by 10...

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:50 pm**

jiminphilly wrote: In other words- if AJ Feeley can have a decent game against the Patriots with shit receivers, Rivers can do the same with a substantially better receiving corp.

Maybe, but what about Volek?

Last I heard, Rivers is unlikely to play.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:01 pm**

mvscal wrote:He's questionable

Without injuries.

And "questionable" is being pretty generous.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:08 pm**

mvscal wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:Nice rant, except that AJ Feeley is better than CryMeA Rivers.
I laughed. What a moronic douchebag you are.

No shit....you U&L fucks must smoke some VERY good weed.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:10 pm**

Neely8 wrote:
I love how people keep bringing up two road games in the middle of a mostly meaningless December. Keep believing you have a chance because of what you saw in these games. While you do that the Pats will be winning by 10...

I love how you ignore numbers and chalk it up to a meaningless december game for a team aiming for the perfect season. Wake up Neeley- Feeley threw for 345 yards and three touchdowns against your overrated secondary.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:12 pm**

jiminphilly wrote:
Neely8 wrote:
I love how people keep bringing up two road games in the middle of a mostly meaningless December. Keep believing you have a chance because of what you saw in these games. While you do that the Pats will be winning by 10...
I love how you ignore numbers and chalk it up to a meaningless december game for a team aiming for the perfect season. Wake up Neeley- Feeley threw for 345 yards and three touchdowns against your overrated secondary.

Which means absolutely DICK to the AFC Championship game.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:26 pm**

RevLimiter wrote:
jiminphilly wrote:
Neely8 wrote:
I love how people keep bringing up two road games in the middle of a mostly meaningless December. Keep believing you have a chance because of what you saw in these games. While you do that the Pats will be winning by 10...
I love how you ignore numbers and chalk it up to a meaningless december game for a team aiming for the perfect season. Wake up Neeley- Feeley threw for 345 yards and three touchdowns against your overrated secondary.
Which means absolutely DICK to the AFC Championship game.

A weakness is a weakness whether it's week 1, 10 or the playoffs. It's all about execution.

Posted: **Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:18 pm**

jiminphilly wrote:
Neely8 wrote:
I love how people keep bringing up two road games in the middle of a mostly meaningless December. Keep believing you have a chance because of what you saw in these games. While you do that the Pats will be winning by 10...
I love how you ignore numbers and chalk it up to a meaningless december game for a team aiming for the perfect season. Wake up Neeley- Feeley threw for 345 yards and three touchdowns against your overrated secondary.

And he lost. Just like all the others. Which team has taken this blueprint on how the Pats can be beat and actually beaten them??

You can score on the Pats D. The problem is you can't score as much as Brady will however. Settle for a field goal and your done.

Posted: **Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:47 am**

Patriots 31

Blots 21

Mark it!

Posted: **Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:04 am**

Cheatriots - 27
Norvs - 13

Posted: **Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:32 pm**

I don't know what Oatmeal Cookie face has planned offensively, but it better be something good. That call on the Darren Sproles screen was perfect, so he better have something like that in mind if he wants to beat the Pats. I think he should let it all out like what Boise St. did to OU in the Fiesta Bowl. Maybe a fake punt, double reverse, and their HB option. They need to do something extraordinary. As for the defense? Blitz early and blitz often. Just let Phillips and Merriman do their thing. Don't hold anything back. its the only way.

Pats 34
Chargers 13

Posted: **Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:10 pm**

Chargers 28

Patriots 21

Posted: **Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:35 pm**

Math-challenged, much?

I'll help you out...

The Pats averaged about 37 points a game on the season.

For the math-challenged (sup Chargertard), that's 5 TD's plus a couple.

On average, it takes 5 TD's and a FG to beat the Pats.

Where are these 5 TD's coming from?

Gimpy Tomlinson going to rush for 5?

Melty McMelterivers going to throw for 5?

While it's been cute watching the Chargette fans don a tutu and say "yeah, but our defense is better now[/i].... uhhhh.... no.

Another math lesson for Chargedork -- don't know if you happened to notice, but NE has a statistically better defense, too.

T1B

San Diego vs. New England

San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England

Re: San Diego vs. New England