Page 1 of 3

Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:20 pm
by War Wagon
Yeah, I know. Who gives a fuck what the rest of the planet thinks? They can't vote, but they watch CNN.

I find it rather flattering (or amusing) that others seem to think they have a stake in America's presidential election. Hell, more than half the people who live here think it doesn't matter and won't even bother to vote.

The world is watching

By WILLIAM J. KOLE, Associated Press Writer
Fri Feb 1, 6:30 AM ET

Germans are gaga over Barack Obama. He's got Japan pretty jazzed, too, along with Hillary Rodham Clinton. Russia's leaders, not so much: They prefer a Republican — as long as it's not Kremlin critic John McCain.

ADVERTISEMENT

And Mexico's president? He doesn't have much use for any of them.

America's extraordinary presidential campaign has captivated politicians and ordinary people around the globe. With so much at stake in the race for the White House, the world is watching with an intensity that hasn't been seen since the Clinton era began in 1992.

After eight years of President Bush, the latest mantra in U.S. politics — "transformational change" — is resonating across the rest of a planet desperate for a fresh start.

"They feel there's a real chance to work with the U.S.," said Julianne Smith, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. "America's image in the world is really on the line."

Non-Americans, she said, are looking for someone who can "restore faith in the United States."

Obama, perhaps not surprisingly, is generating most of the buzz abroad.

"Der schwarze Kennedy," some German admirers are calling him: "The black JFK."

"He is young, charming and sexy!" the mass-circulation newspaper Bild gushed. "Obama is now the ideal projection screen for hopes and expectations in Europe" and the U.S. alike, said Christian Hacke, a professor at the University of Bonn.

"I like him. I like his ideas, his attitude, his appearance. I prefer him to Hillary Clinton, who is more artificial," said Eva Berto, a Rome doctor who thinks Obama would bring a new approach to the crisis in Iraq and the nuclear standoff with Iran.

Japanese media are closely tracking both Obama and the woman they refer to simply as "Hillary," and focusing on the possibility that either could make history.

"The idea since the country's founding — 'You can't become president if you're not a white man' — has already been destroyed," the Mainichi newspaper said in an editorial.

But in Europe, where some see Obama as untested, support for Clinton is widespread, and nostalgia for her husband's charisma runs deep. When scandals rocked the Clinton White House, most Europeans responded with a Gallic shrug.

"Nobody in Europe ever took Bill Clinton's problems in office seriously," said Patrick Dunleavy, a political scientist at the London School of Economics. "Nobody could ever understand why Americans were so upset. Bill Clinton was always a fantastic presence in Europe."

The Republican presidential hopefuls, by contrast, are not highly regarded in Europe: Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee are seen as too religious, and the 71-year-old McCain as too old.

To Britons, history's most popular postwar presidents were Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton because of their perceived levelheadedness and intelligence, said Dunleavy. The most despised? President Bush and Ronald Reagan "because they were seen as erratic and unpredictable," he said.

Yet Democrats don't rule the entire world of public opinion.

Saad al-Hadithi, a political analyst in Baghdad, contends the Republican candidates are more committed to Iraq and have a better approach.

"They show more support to the political progress and to combating terrorist groups in Iraq," he said. "The Democrats, especially Hillary Clinton, are calling for the withdrawal of U.S. forces, but they are not offering an alternative. Such a withdrawal while the Iraqi security forces are still weak will lead to disastrous results."

Russia's leaders also consider Republicans more pragmatic, said Nkolai Petrov, an analyst with the Carnegie Moscow Center.

But the Kremlin, Petrov said, would likely have "serious concerns" if McCain wins the Republican nomination because of the Arizona senator's harsh and persistent criticism of Vladimir Putin's autocratic government.

Others in Russia are drawn to the lively U.S. campaign if only because it's such a sharp contrast to Moscow's tightly choreographed March 2 presidential election — a contest that Putin's favored successor, Dmitry Medvedev, is seen as certain to win.

Africans naturally gravitate toward Obama, whose father was from Kenya.

Israelis, though, seem to prefer Hillary Clinton — even though Obama has voiced support for key Israeli demands in peace talks with the Palestinians — because of her experience and the backing Bill Clinton gave to the Jewish state during his two terms as president.

Amid the raging debate over immigration, Mexicans arguably have more at stake in the U.S. election than any other nation. But President Felipe Calderon doesn't think very highly of any of the candidates.

"The only theme," he declared in December, "is to compete to see who can be the most swaggering, macho and anti-Mexican."

In the post-Bush era, the bottom line is blunt and simple, Dunleavy said.

"People all around the world are pretty worried," he said. "They want a president who will restore a kind of U.S. legitimacy in the world."

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:35 pm
by KC Scott
Wags42?

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:28 pm
by Cuda
War Wagon wrote: "Der schwarze Kennedy,"
Image

Hast Du gezehn in deine leben? Woof, they darker than us!

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:38 am
by Bobby42
KC Scott wrote:Wags42?
Slow news day, but I'm at least careful enough to trim away....
War Wargon wrote:ADVERTISEMENT

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:03 am
by War Wagon
KC Scott wrote:Wags42?
Oops!

Should've included a graph or six.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:17 am
by RadioFan
War Wagon wrote:They can't vote, but they watch CNN.
Actually, they're probably just as likely to watch a NewsCorp-owned network, if not moreso.

The race is interesting this year -- probably more than in anyone's lifetime here, Luth and Wolfman included.

But as to the apathy, not surprising, given "American Idol" is the top TV show and most Americans can't find Brazil on a fucking map.

Election? What election?

Honey, who's playing at the halftime show on Sunday? And do we have enough Velveeta for that really good dip of yours?

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:31 am
by War Wagon
RadioFan wrote: And do we have enough Velveeta for that really good dip of yours?[/i]
Ok, but you have to add Rotel and some lean ground beef.

Running out of Velveeta is never an option. Wal-Mart stocks that commodity by the pallet load. I hope that Scott's smart enough to invest in Kraft.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:40 am
by Y2K
Rack cuda.....

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:52 am
by War Wagon
Y2K wrote:Rack cuda.....
I just had a rozy moment.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:59 am
by RadioFan
War Wagon wrote:Running out of Velveeta is never an option. Wal-Mart stocks that commodity by the pallet load.
Attention shoppers, sig sale regarding American pride on isle 1. We have American Idol sets on isle 3.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:28 am
by Y2K
War Wagon wrote:
Y2K wrote:Rack cuda.....
I just had a rozy moment.
They happen from time to time......

BTW- How do you post pics?

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:31 am
by RadioFan
Toddowen wrote:Blather out for yourself, dip-drooller. You're still going to be rolling in compost no matter what any of these sausageheads promises for your neck.


So don't expect anything special to come from this.
Nice job. Except it has nothing to do with the topic at hand, dipshit.

Shoudn't you be out looking for 14-year-old girls or talking about football?

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:54 am
by RadioFan
Btw, can I get a collective groan from all of you "all I wanna do is watch the Super Bowl to see if it's a good game, and have plenty of Velveeta" idiots:

Tuesday is a lot more important than Sunday.

You might want to actually read the story Wags posted above. Our system, despite its flaws, is pretty good.

Special bonus: Some Rush lyrics, from the album, Hold Your Fire, and the song, "Prime Mover"

The point of the journey, is not to arrive.
Toddowen wrote:You don't need to focus on a candidates stance on an issue that they'll skirt and dodge from once elected.
We're in the before "once elected" stage, not the before "once erected" stage, champ.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:19 am
by Y2K
Guess what...

They watch us here in the good ole USA almost as good as our Media watches and comments on foreign matters.


Don't Diss the Superbowl.......

Super Primary Tuesday isn't nearly that big.

Pats by 10

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:40 pm
by KC Scott
War Wagon wrote:
KC Scott wrote:Wags42?
Oops!

Should've included a graph or six.
I'll start slow... see if you can understand this one:


Image

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:42 pm
by Goober McTuber
ImageImage

Sorry, I just don't see the resemblance.

Sincerely,

Whitey Wagon

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:18 pm
by BSmack
RadioFan wrote:But as to the apathy, not surprising, given "American Idol" is the top TV show and most Americans can't find Brazil on a fucking map.
Lemme take this one...

Image

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:40 pm
by Diogenes
War Wagon wrote:Yeah, I know. Who gives a fuck what the rest of the planet thinks?
You could have stopped there.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:51 pm
by Diogenes
BSmack wrote:Image
Who cares?

Image

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:05 pm
by War Wagon
Japanese media are closely tracking both Obama and the woman they refer to simply as "Hillary," and focusing on the possibility that either could make history.

"The idea since the country's founding — 'You can't become president if you're not a white man' — has already been destroyed," the Mainichi newspaper said in an editorial.
Not so fast, my slant-eyed friends and makers of products that American consumers, ie; Sudden Sam, drool over. All the switches and buttons haven't been pushed and turned just yet. Some of them are likely to break!

The only thing assured is that a woman or a black will be a nominee. Don't be crowning them just yet.

I can't imagine a scenario that will get more rednecks off the couch to go vote than the prospect of a bitch like Billary or a black man, any black man, as POTUS.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:23 pm
by Diogenes
War Wagon wrote:I can't imagine a scenario that will get more rednecks off the couch to go vote than the prospect of a bitch like Billary or a black man, any black man, as POTUS.

First of all, that line is insulting to bitches everywhere.

And you won't see a black or female Dem being elected because they will only put up worthless unqualified tokens on the ticket.

Now if Condi decides to run in '12 or '16...

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:31 pm
by BSmack
War Wagon wrote:I can't imagine a scenario that will get more rednecks off the couch to go vote than the prospect of a bitch like Billary or a black man, any black man, as POTUS.
A month ago you said I was quaking in my boots over the thought of a Huckabee landslide. How's that working out for you?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:25 pm
by Y2K
BSmack wrote:
War Wagon wrote:I can't imagine a scenario that will get more rednecks off the couch to go vote than the prospect of a bitch like Billary or a black man, any black man, as POTUS.
A month ago you said I was quaking in my boots over the thought of a Huckabee landslide. How's that working out for you?

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Talk about a laugher...

Follow the money....Follow the money......

Hows that working for out for YOU?

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:50 pm
by BSmack
Y2K wrote:
BSmack wrote:A month ago you said I was quaking in my boots over the thought of a Huckabee landslide. How's that working out for you?

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Talk about a laugher...

Follow the money....Follow the money......

Hows that working for out for YOU?
I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. But I would like to say, don't get your panties in a knot.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:13 pm
by War Wagon
BSmack wrote:A month ago you said I was quaking in my boots over the thought of a Huckabee landslide.
I did? :?

Link?

If I did say that, I must've been really drunk at the time. I'll admit that I certainly didn't see McCain coming on as strong as he has lately, but neither did most anyone else. I still think it's a strong possibility that if MaCain wins the nomination, he'll have Huckabee as his Veep.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:20 pm
by War Wagon
RadioFan wrote: Tuesday is a lot more important than Sunday.
No doubt. People will forget the SB in less than a week. Super Tuesday will have ramifications for years to come.

To me, watching nationwide election results are waaay more intriguing than any major championship sporting event. Unless my team is involved, of course, of which there's never much chance of that happening.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:19 pm
by Y2K
I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
:shocker:

One would imagine with as much "talking out your ass" as you do it's not surprising you can't remember your own words.

Doesn't really matter anyway, your profound stupidity is nothing new.

Carry on.....

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:54 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Y2K wrote:
I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
:shocker:

One would imagine with as much "talking out your ass" as you do it's not surprising you can't remember your own words.

Doesn't really matter anyway, your profound stupidity is nothing new.

Carry on.....
Why don't you stick to digging out pools with all the other wetbacks you meet up with at Home Depot everyday? Or fellating the ballsack of one kookey-eyed loser? It's all your good for.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:46 pm
by Cuda
Papa Willie wrote:
To Britons, history's most popular postwar presidents were Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton because of their perceived levelheadedness and intelligence, said Dunleavy. The most despised? President Bush and Ronald Reagan "because they were seen as erratic and unpredictable," he said.
Poor stupid fuckers.
You mean the Limeys, right?
Burglars have rights too, says British Attorney General
by By Melissa Kite and Andrew Alderson

A fresh row broke out last night about the rights of householders to fight back against intruders after the Government's most senior lawyer defended the rights of burglars.

Lord Goldsmith, the attorney-general, flew in the face of the Prime Minister's pledge to look again at the law with a view to giving homeowners more rights when he said that existing legislation was adequate.

He said that criminals must also have the right to protection from violence, prompting David Davis, the shadow home secretary, to accuse the government of being dangerously split on the issue.

Lord Goldsmith's intervention came as Sir John Stevens, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, dismissed fears that giving homeowners greater freedom when tackling burglars would lead to an "arms race" that would put them in greater danger.He denied that a change in the law, which currently gives homeowners the right to use "reasonable force" when tackling intruders, would encourage burglars to become more aggressive.

In an interview with The Telegraph, Sir John - who last weekend came out in favour of the Right to Fight Back campaign, launched by this newspaper two months ago - said: "I am convinced that enabling householders to use whatever force is necessary will discourage burglars.

"The fact that a would-be intruder knows a householder can respond without the fear of being prosecuted will undoubtedly deter criminal acts." Sir John, who will step down next month after five years as commissioner, said fellow police officers were confident that it would act as a deterrent.

"We are on the ground," he said. "We smell it, we see it, we hear it. We know what we are talking about."

Last week, Tony Blair told the House of Commons that he would look at strengthening the law and a Tory MP has introduced a private member's bill to do so.

Lord Goldsmith, however, appeared to take issue with the Prime Minister's pledge to act. "We must protect victims and law abiding citizens," he said.

"But we have to recognize that others have some rights as well. They don't lose all rights because they're engaged in criminal conduct."

Mr Davis said: "They certainly do lose quite a lot of rights. The Government ought to make up its mind. The Prime Minister says one thing and the Attorney General says another.

"Of course all human beings have rights, but when somebody enters your home to commit a crime they give up a large portion of them."

Some critics of a change in the law have voiced concerns that burglars will feel they have to carry guns, knives and other weapons to protect themselves from householders.

Sir John, however, did not see this as a problem. "I have confidence in the good judgment and common sense of the public in knowing how far they should go."

He said that householders should be able to use whatever force is necessary even if - in exceptional circumstances - it involved killing the intruder.

He spoke of his regret about the repercussions over the verdict on Tony Martin, the farmer who shot dead one burglar and seriously injured another during a break-in at his farm in August 1999.

There was a public outcry when Martin was found guilty at Norwich Crown Court and sentenced to life in prison. The charge and sentence were later reduced to five years for manslaughter.

Sir John did not suggest that the jury had reached the wrong verdict, but added: "The Tony Martin case is unfortunate because it has skewed the debate [on the public's right to protect their home]. But it is a fact that burglars have acted with greater confidence since the Tony Martin verdict and that has to be a matter of regret."

Lord Goldsmith, however, warned of the dangers of using the Martin case to make bad law: "There are very few cases that have given rise to this problem. Besides Tony Martin, there's only one I know about.

"It's always possible to extrapolate from one case and think that something is happening across the country when it isn't."

Mr Blair's announcement of a review of the law came three days after the Conservative Party threw its weight behind a new parliamentary attempt to win more rights for householders to protect them from burglars.

The Telegraph revealed last weekend how Patrick Mercer, the Tory MP, would introduce a Private Member's Bill to change the law in favour of homeowners.

In an article in this newspaper today, Mr Mercer described Mr Blair's promise to consult before taking action as a "classic delaying tactic".

Michael Howard, the Tory leader, yesterday praised this newspaper's campaign. "I pay tribute to the highly effective campaign run over so many months by The Sunday Telegraph. It was the first newspaper to highlight this crucial issue and its persistence has been a key factor in winning this change to the law and in forcing Tony Blair's U-turn," he said. "We now need to ensure that Patrick Mercer's bill gets through parliament. The Sunday Telegraph's continued vigilance will be crucial in ensuring this."
The English are hopeless faggots

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:10 am
by Y2K
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Y2K wrote:
I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
:shocker:

One would imagine with as much "talking out your ass" as you do it's not surprising you can't remember your own words.

Doesn't really matter anyway, your profound stupidity is nothing new.

Carry on.....
Why don't you stick to digging out pools with all the other wetbacks you meet up with at Home Depot everyday? Or fellating the ballsack of one kookey-eyed loser? It's all your good for.

How cute...

BSmack has his own special "Spit Bitch."
What happened? Daddy's dead?

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:39 am
by Screw_Michigan
Y2K wrote:How cute...

BSmack has his own special "Spit Bitch."
What happened? Daddy's dead?
What happened was another round of the classic hysterical, hand-wringing histronics you've come to be well known for around these parts. Have another drink, lush.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:13 am
by Goober McTuber
Diaphanous wrote: [boob]Now if Condi decides to run in '12 or '16...[/boob]

Then the Dems could run Ross Perot and win, you stupid fuck.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:17 am
by Y2K
you've come to be well known for around these parts.
Like your sucking another posters cock ......

Gotcha....

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:43 am
by BSmack
Y2K wrote:
I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.
:shocker:
Not really. All I think of when I think of you is that you're that crazy SOB from Fresno who thinks PSU has a black helicopter hovering over Fresno. If you would like to provide some context for your latest insane rant, feel free. Otherwise go Cheney yourself.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:05 am
by Y2K
Jeebus......

You can't remember your explaining to our favorite Canandian Communist that the candidates were already a given because all you had to do is........ Follow the money


I called you an idiot because it was much to early and that contributions to certain campaigns were focused towards either promoting a candidate or giving the rope they need to hang themselves. Funding Bubba's expenses as he rides the "Hillary Express" speaks volumes even to a political deaf mute like yourself.

As usual you were wrong.
Nothing out of the ordinary....
It's probably better you forgot anyway.....
A convienent malfunction of your frontal lobe due to apathy. Works for me.
Carry on.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 9:18 am
by poptart
Most Korean Koreans have maps ....
They know what's what with American politics.
And trust me, whenever I speak to the man on the Korean street lately, and the discussion drifts to politics, the first names out of mr k0rean's mouff are either Obama or Hillary.
Not one single time has Ping said to me, "Wow and WOW, poptart, but isn't that Romney guy GROOVY!!"

It's ALL about Hillary and Obamer in the land of the rising sun.
The media has spoon-fed them on the lady Clinton and Bareback Obama.

So I conclude that the fix is in.
Stay home on votin' day, fans, because it's ALL democrat in '08.


The Korean Koreans also have an odd fetish for American sports team gear ...... particularly baseball, but some basketball and an occassional NFL something-or-other too.

Lots of slants walk around with BoSox, ChiSox or Dodger lids.
Those seem to be the favs.
Occassional Yankee hat, Astro hat (believe it or not) or Rockie hat.
And maybe a stray Cub or Cardinal hat can be seen.

Laker gear has found it's way here too.

And funny enough, I saw one guy walking around in FULL Denver Bronco gear a while back.
Hat, sweatshirt and sweatpants.
I was LMAO.

Some frontrunning douchebag Dunger fan dumped all his gear at Salvation Army the day Bucktoothe retired, and the gear made it all the way over here to k0rea.
Now Tang struts around a very happy man.

Props!

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:30 pm
by BSmack
Y2K wrote:Jeebus......

You can't remember your explaining to our favorite Canandian Communist that the candidates were already a given because all you had to do is........ Follow the money
I night have remembered it, you know, if I had actually said it.
I called you an idiot because it was much to early and that contributions to certain campaigns were focused towards either promoting a candidate or giving the rope they need to hang themselves. Funding Bubba's expenses as he rides the "Hillary Express" speaks volumes even to a political deaf mute like yourself.
Find me one time where I ever said that money trumps incompetence. Just one.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:32 pm
by BSmack
poptart wrote:The Korean Koreans also have an odd fetish for American sports team gear ...... particularly baseball, but some basketball and an occassional NFL something-or-other too.

Lots of slants walk around with BoSox, ChiSox or Dodger lids.
Those seem to be the favs.
Occassional Yankee hat, Astro hat (believe it or not) or Rockie hat.
And maybe a stray Cub or Cardinal hat can be seen.

Laker gear has found it's way here too.

And funny enough, I saw one guy walking around in FULL Denver Bronco gear a while back.
Hat, sweatshirt and sweatpants.
I was LMAO.
No #86 Hines Ward jerseys? Seems like only yesterday Hines was a Korean "national hero".

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:04 pm
by War Wagon
poptart wrote:Most Korean Koreans have maps
Korean Koreans?

As in S. Koreans, the ones in the North don't count as Koreans?

It's ALL about Hillary and Obamer in the land of the rising sun.
The media has spoon-fed them on the lady Clinton and Bareback Obama.

So I conclude that the fix is in.
Stay home on votin' day, fans, because it's ALL democrat in '08.
I thought Japan was "the land of the rising sun". :?

No matter. There's no "fix" in. You've somehow gotten your politics mixed up with your NFL takes.

But agreed that the Dems should win in this glorious season of Bush bashing and all things republican, but that whole thingy of having the 1st woman or black president might derail those ambitions.

So if you don't mind, I'll go ahead and trek to the polling place this Super Tuesday, and again the 1st Tuesday in November, despite what Joe slant eyed man on the street in Korean Korea might think.

See, i tend to take voting as a duty that's not to be taken lightly. My vote counts the same as anyone else's.

Ya' know I luvs me some poptart, but I frigging hate it when someone tells me not to bother to vote.

Re: Intense Global interest in U.S. presidential politics

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:10 pm
by Goober McTuber
War Wagon wrote:My vote counts the same as anyone else's.

Yes, and it will be neatly negated by BSmack's. Just sayin'.