Page 1 of 1

Is keeping hillary alive a good idea....

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:43 pm
by smackaholic
...for we facist, neanderthal, extra chromosome, right wing, neocons?

Limbaugh and others were suggesting that teehas reps vote for her to keep the dems fighting.

It kinda does make sense in away. If Hill does pull it out, I suspect there will be more than a few kneeegroes staying home on election day. Well, maybe they'll go to popeye's for some chicken or something, but, they won't be voting. Some might even pull the lever for the other evil white devil, Mccain.

I have one problem with this idea. I call it the 007 rule. In every fukking bond movie, the bad guy has james where he wants him, but, he doesn't pull the trigger. Instead he decides to kill him fancylike. And, ofcourse james takes advantage of this lapse and turns it around.

Hill may not be 007. She has way too thick ankles, but, there is a similarity here. I say that if you have her dangling over the shark tank, just cut the fukking rope. Actually, empty the clip in her head, then cut the rope. Don't wait for some timer thingy to do it after you leave.

Re: Is keeping hillary alive a good idea....

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 4:59 pm
by Diogenes
They both suck ass equally. The positive is that the more $$$ they spend against each other, the less they will have in the general election.

Re: Is keeping hillary alive a good idea....

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:39 pm
by ChargerMike
"Actually, empty the clip in her head, then cut the rope"

...in

Re: Is keeping hillary alive a good idea....

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:58 pm
by Diogenes
It's an Iran/Iraq 80s war scenario. If your enemy is fighting your other enemy, site back and enjoy the show.

Re: Is keeping hillary alive a good idea....

Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:32 pm
by Diogenes
mvscal wrote:
Diogenes wrote:It's an Iran/Iraq 80s war scenario. If your enemy is fighting your other enemy, site back and enjoy the show.
We didn't sit back and enjoy that show. We actively played both ends against the middle in order to achieve a stalemate.
The principle is the same though. The difference being I wouldn't endorse actually giving $$$ to both candidates to beat the shit out of each other. Just let them spend up as much as possible of what they've already got.