Page 1 of 1

RACK the Democraps!

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:58 pm
by OCmike
Democrats say pausing troop reductions would signal to the Iraqis that the United States was committed to the war indefinitely. They plan to push legislation this spring that would force the Iraqi government to spend its own surplus in oil revenues to rebuild the country, sparing U.S. dollars.

"This nation is facing record deficits and the Iraqis have translated their oil revenues into budget surpluses rather than effective services," Skelton said. "Under these circumstances and with the strategic risk to our nation and our military readiness, we and the American people must ask _ why should we stay in Iraq in large numbers?"

Iraq is looking at a potential boon in oil revenue this year, possibly as much as $100 billion in 2007 and 2008. Meanwhile, the U.S. military is having to buy its fuel on the open market, paying on average $3.23 a gallon and spending some $153 million a month in Iraq on fuel alone.

While Iraq pays for fuel for its own troops, it has relied heavily on U.S. dollars to provide people with basic services, including more than $45 billion for reconstruction.

Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, estimated on Tuesday that Iraq has some $30 billion in U.S. banks. He said he expects legislation addressing the issue will be proposed as part of this year's war spending bill or the 2009 defense authorization bill.

Lacking the votes to order troops home by a certain date, Democrats see fencing off reconstruction money as an alternative to challenging the Bush administration's Iraq policies. And several Republicans have signaled their concerns about burgeoning Iraqi oil revenues at a time when the war is growing increasingly costly.
Full Story

Finally, some policy from the Democraps that makes sense, rather than just the partisan Bush policy-hounding and general bitching they've done for the past 8 years.

What really bothers me about this story is that, I guess it's fine to have your rich uncle footing the bill, but aren't Arabs supposed to be prideful to a fault? Why would they let us continue to pay for crap they could be paying for themselves? By doing so, they could say, "Hey, look how far we've come!", to their own people and perhaps get a little bit of faith. Instead, they're probably working on the 29th palace. :meds:

Re: RACK the Democraps!

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:24 pm
by OCmike
mvscal wrote:Seems to me that was Bush's plan from the beginning.
So he said, but he's almost out of office and he hasn't brought it up in, well, years. When was he planning on implementing it, Jan 27th?

Re: RACK the Democraps!

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:41 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
You're not going anywhere. Sit down and shut up.

Re: RACK the Democraps!

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:12 am
by OCmike
Martyred wrote:You're not going anywhere. Sit down and shut up.
Well we sure as hell won't be asking for any Canadian help when it comes to waging war. Wait, that's not entirely true...if we find something that we have to wring our hands over, we'll call and ask for some professional advice on how to go about it properly.

Re: RACK the Democraps!

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:19 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
OCmike wrote:
Well we sure as hell won't be asking for any Canadian help when it comes to waging war.

You're not waging war. You're fucking up an occupation. Know the difference.

Re: RACK the Democraps!

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:31 pm
by BSmack
OCmike wrote:
Martyred wrote:You're not going anywhere. Sit down and shut up.
Well we sure as hell won't be asking for any Canadian help when it comes to waging war.

You mean other than the 2,500 Canadians currently serving in Afghanistan?

Re: RACK the Democraps!

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:18 pm
by OCmike
I try not to let facts get in the way of my posts.

Besides, somebody has to be used for the first wave.

Re: RACK the Democraps!

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:36 pm
by SunCoastSooner
OCmike wrote:I try not to let facts get in the way of my posts.

Besides, somebody has to be used for the first wave.
It's a shame that our nation is always expected to lead that first wave...