T1B

Papa Willie wrote:Uh oh..........

Sin,
Hitlery

IndyFrisco wrote:No Youtube access at work. What was the context?

Charles De Mar wrote:You people will reach for the lowest common demoninator.

a 16 year old clip that's probably highly edited and taken out of context.

No wonder the Republican party has shit the bed in all the governors elections and congressional seating last cycle.

fuckheads.

I just spoke to D.A. Pennebaker, the director of "The War Room," who said his film had been doctored to produce a widely-viewed YouTube clip.

In a clip from his film on the 1992 Clinton campaign, posted to YouTube today, Clinton advisor Mickey Kantor is -- according to subtitles -- seen referring to Indianans with an expletive and to his colleague George Stephanopolous with a racial slur.

"He does not say that. He does not say that," said Pennebaker, after viewing the clip.

He said the initial expletive referred to the anticipated reaction in the Bush White House to the fact that Ross Perot's polling numbers were holding strong.

"What he says is he’s surprised Perot’s numbers are holding," said Pennebaker in a brief phone interview. "He says they must be shi**ing in the White House."

The second expletive, he said, appeared to have been entirely fabricated, with new audio dubbed onto the original movie.

Pennebaker appeared surprised and amused by the video.

"A thousand people saw that film in theaters and didn't think" the second expletive had been used, he said. "It's very clearly understandable. It's not like it was in Bulgarian."

Tom In VA wrote:http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... oered.html

Apparently it's a doctored video, Charles wins the prize. It was snippet taken from a movie called "The War Room" .

"He does not say that [n-word]. He does not say that," said Pennebaker, after viewing the clip.

He said the initial expletive [shit] referred to the anticipated reaction in the Bush White House to the fact that Ross Perot's polling numbers were holding strong.

"What he says is he’s surprised Perot’s numbers are holding," said Pennebaker in a brief phone interview. "He says they must be shi**ing in the White House."

"Indiana was not even on our radar screen," he said, "And I was talking about the polling and not the people... If you look at The War Room, this is not the way Carville or George interpreted my statement. This is frankly libelous."

Papa Willie wrote:You're right. Clinton "did not have sexual relations with that woman", either.

Charles De Mar wrote:They fuxxed the link...that was fast.

BSmack wrote:[
Hillary wants to play from the Rove playbook? Oh well, she better learn to play defense.

BTW, I was a Tsongas guy during the 92 primaries. I voted for Bill in the general as the "lesser of 2 evils", a world view I carried through in 96, 00 and 04. But no more. If Obama doesn't win, I will be voting for Mike Gravel. Fuck picking the "lesser" of the evils. If the two major parties don't reflect my views, I'll be going elsewhere.

A new article from ABC News.

Kantor comments caused controversy back in 93

Charles De Mar wrote:Considering your resume of supporting losing candidates for the last nearly two decades it's not suprising you are now left with the idiotic option of 'throwing your vote away'.

Vote 2 party or stay home.

BSmack wrote:

Charles De Mar wrote:Considering your resume of supporting losing candidates for the last nearly two decades it's not suprising you are now left with the idiotic option of 'throwing your vote away'.

Vote 2 party or stay home.

I can think of no more effective way to "throw my vote away" than to vote for someone who does not reflect my views.

Charles De Mar wrote:Unless you yourself ran for election, NO one candidate would ever reflect your views in particular and by defination they certainly wouldn't emulate the collective views of a voting block. Certainly, not a voting block worthy of electing your tard. Goddam.

It's a 2 party system, pretty fucking simple paradigm.

Dinsdale wrote:All these responses, and not one trying to refute the "Indiana is shit" thing...

Ponderous.

OCmike wrote:Walk into the party with a boner in your sweatpants, much?