T1B

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 3:02 pm**

Okie dokie.

Congress needs to be murdered too.

Without their authorization he couldn't have carried out this Helter Skelter.

Oh, and they have continued voting to fund it.

What say you, Vince?

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 3:44 pm**

Props to dude for making a buck.

Except for 6that pesky law that says that a president can't be tried for stuff he did while in office.

Now Cheney, on the other hand, enjoys no such protection.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 4:03 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:Props to dude for making a buck.

Except for 6that pesky law that says that a president can't be tried for stuff he did while in office.

An impeached president CAN be indicted, tried, and punished as per current laws.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 7:01 pm**

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 7:30 pm**

Ken wrote: An impeached president CAN be indicted, tried, and punished as per current laws.

At times.

The yellowcake scam would involve making public communication between Bush and his aids, in a matter that clearly involves national security.

It's my understanding such communications are covered under executive priviledge, even after the president leaves office.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 7:41 pm**

mvscal wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:The yellowcake scam would involve making public communication between Bush and his aids, in a matter that clearly involves national security.
The yellowcake "scam" is a bullshit red herring. If anyone should be prosecuted over that it should be that fuckwitted tard, Joe Wilson.

Educate yourself, dumbass.

Those "white paper" reports get sold for profit every day. And about 99% of them are bullshit, and US intelligence agencies know it. Yet they even sent someone with ties to the country in question to investigate, and he concluded the same thing -- "bullshit story."

But apparently, "complete bullshit" somehow translates to "slam dunk" in Bushiecronyism.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 8:05 pm**

British intelligence

I laughed.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 8:18 pm**

BTW -- even if the yellowcake scam, was true (it wasn't... it was a bald-faced fabrication for profit)...

Uhm...

What enrichment facility was Saddam processing the yellowcake with again?

Help me out here?

Unprocessed uranium was about as useful to Saddam as it is to you and I.

There is kinda that. But let's not let very simple logic stand in the way of Busheney's boys getting rich.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 8:27 pm**

mvscal wrote:Are you seriously attempting to suggest that Joe Wilson conducted an investigation? You've got to be fucking kidding.

Hmmm.... let's see...

That's right, the ambassador to Niger said the same thing, as did he deputy commander of the US European Forces.

Matter of fact, every person outside of the White House and Downing St all came to the same conclusion... "BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!"

Who knows, they maybe even said things like "why the fuck would anyone want yellowcake if they have no access to an enrichment facility?"

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 8:31 pm**

Fuck... in reviewing this matter, I'd completely forgotten how the white-paper in question couldn't even get the names of the Nigerian officials in question right...

maybe a wee bit of a red flag there?

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 8:50 pm**

I'll need a pair of these....

mvscal's naiveté is glaring....

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 8:58 pm**

mvscal wrote: But they did...in Libya.

OK.

You decided a little KYOA was in order before the big weekend?

Should I point out your complete fucking stupidity, or are you going to say "yup, I'm an idiot, and I just clowned myself by making up stupid shit to defend my position"?

Well, since you're not going to do the right thing, I'll helpyou out...

Gee, mvscal... why don't you go ahead and link me... and everyone else on the planet up with the links to where Saddam allegedly tried to procure ENRICHED URANIUM?

Since that's new, even to the CIA, you dumbfuck.

Hello?

Is anyone in there, dumbfuck?

Remember... we were talking about the YELLOWCAKE?

It's wasn't that long ago that you should be having such severe memory lapses... or were you just lying to try and save face?

Say it with me, mv...

Y-E-L-L-O-W-C-A-K-E

Yellowcake.

I'll help you out some more -- yellowcake is unenriched uranium. Of little use besides making bitchin boat anchors.

But feel free to keep discussing Saddam's procurement of ENRICHED URANIUM from Libya...

I'll leave the light on... wait, no I won't, since you made that up... just like some out-of-work spy made up the yellowcake-from-Nigeria story to begin with.

Dumbfuck.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 9:49 pm**

Mmmm, yellow cake.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 9:50 pm**

My favorite, although Lemon Icebox Pie is closing in fast.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 9:51 pm**

Crumplerwife prefers...POUNDcake.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 9:54 pm**

this is BLATANT disrespect. this will NOT be fucking tolerated

your balls are MINE, psufan. fucking MINE

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 9:55 pm**

PSUFAN wrote:Crumplerwife prefers...POUNDcake.

All women prefer pound. Some just lie to spare their man's feelings. Where you been at?

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 9:55 pm**

You tell him, DB. You fucking tell tha tCOCKSUKER!

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 9:57 pm**

That's nothing, assHoles. I'm gonna beat you fucking SENSELESS.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 10:00 pm**

PSUFAN wrote:That's nothing, assHoles. I'm gonna beat you fucking SENSELESS.

Fuck you. I'll make your final moments here on earth so fucking painful you'll wish you were raised by a book of matches.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 10:03 pm**

I'll beat you until your goddamned SKULL is HOLLA. Fuck you...FUCK YOU.

Posted: **Fri May 23, 2008 10:09 pm**

Slow your role, bomber. We'll get this assfuck soon enough. We'll do this. We'll do this for Slim.

Head on over to the HQ tonight. It ain't nuthin but Buds, bongs, and bitches. We'll probably break out old school Double Dragon and Castlevania too. Shit is fuckin ON.

The rest of you can eat my balls.

Posted: **Sat May 24, 2008 1:54 am**

Dinsdale wrote:
Ken wrote: An impeached president CAN be indicted, tried, and punished as per current laws.

At times.

The yellowcake scam would involve making public communication between Bush and his aids, in a matter that clearly involves national security.

It's my understanding such communications are covered under executive priviledge, even after the president leaves office.

Executive priviledge can be 'overidden', for lack of better terms. Nixon and Clinton at the front should have told you.

Posted: **Sat May 24, 2008 8:52 am**

Rollins wrote:bitches, old school Double Dragon and Castlevania.

and wearing these no doubt:

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 2:57 am**

I wonder if this is partly why the US congress has lower approval ratings than Bush?

He should be charged for War Crimes. He should of been impeached along with Cheney and removed from office and Pelosi should be President.

I am very disappointed the democratic controlled Congress let Bush and his crime syndicate off.

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 5:47 am**

Canadian wrote:I wonder if this is partly why the US congress has lower approval ratings than Bush?

I am very disappointed the democratic controlled Congress let Bush and his crime syndicate off.

Really....Pierre and Maggie couldn't give you any advice?

before u TAKE OFF...send Labatt's to ALL of the BOARD...

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 3:56 pm**

Qbert wrote:
Canadian wrote:I wonder if this is partly why the US congress has lower approval ratings than Bush?

I am very disappointed the democratic controlled Congress let Bush and his crime syndicate off.
Really....Pierre and Maggie couldn't give you any advice?

before u TAKE OFF...send Labatt's to ALL of the BOARD...

But the Canadian is right.

(and that makes four. Enjoy your Memorial Day, everyone.)

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 4:45 pm**

Risa wrote:But the Canadian is right.

A Canadian who is "right"?

You're a fuckin' jerkoff.

Posted: **Mon May 26, 2008 4:55 pm**

.m2 wrote:I'll need a pair of these....

mvscal's apologism is glaring....

FTFY.

Posted: **Tue May 27, 2008 10:57 pm**

Dang, Terry, who's Ginger apologizing for now?

Sirfindafold wrote:
Risa wrote:But the Canadian is right.
A Canadian who is "right"?

Yes, the Canadian is right. Where is the Canadian wrong?

For myself: we were lied to to get us into a war with Iraq. Now reports (at least in my Sunday paper) are that Bush wants to go to war with Iran by October. What the fuck? Why? What's the rush? What's the hurry? and Pickle is right about Israel fighting its own wars when it wants to start shit. Maybe shit'll end up like Lebanon. Maybe worse. Maybe not. But Israel would fight its own battles instead of its cheerleaders here in the US making the US the bully.

And I'm still waiting for those lowered gas prices promised by an invasion into Iraq -- remember that side benefit, bandied about here? No one talked about the timeline for that, though. Gas is $4 and near $5 in places. God help California. Clinton was a lot of things (and he's getting steadily worse with the paranoia he's been showing recently because of his wife's campaign and the lessening chance of him being able to deliver on all the promises that put money in his off-shores bank accounts); but he did get impeached, over bullshit.

Where's Bush' impeachment? Where's Cheney's? (and where's the additional news on Rove being served?) What will it take?

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 12:38 am**

President Bush will not be tried for Murder.
He will not be impeached.
He will be long remembered as a President that brought us into a long seemingly never ending war and a President that left office with our economy in shambles.

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 1:02 am**

President Truman will not be tried for Murder.
He will not be impeached.
He will be long remembered as a President that brought us into a long seemingly never ending war and a President that left office with our economy in shambles.

FTFY !!

Funny how history shines a different light on our Presidents !

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 4:05 am**

Wolfman wrote:President Truman will not be tried for Murder.
He will not be impeached.
He will be long remembered as a President that brought us into a long seemingly never ending war and a President that left office with our economy in shambles.

FTFY !!

Funny how history shines a different light on our Presidents !

Jesus Christ, you senile old fuck. Do you honestly believe that George W. Bush will ever be regarded in the same light as Truman? Or even Hoover? Have another 6 Beast lights and pass out already.

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 2:39 pm**

mvscal wrote:
Risa wrote:Now reports (at least in my Sunday paper) are that Bush wants to go to war with Iran by October.
Says who?

In looking up the columnist who wrote about it in my sunday paper, online, I came across this

May 20, 2008, 2:57 pm Another Rumor on Attacking Iran Bites the Dust By Mike Nizza

Who needs the morning coffee to jolt you awake, when you’ve got headlines like this one from The Jerusalem Post?

Bush intends to attack Iran before the end of his term

It’s provocative, that’s for sure. But it’s also wrong, according to The White House. In a statement issued later in the day, the president’s press secretary, Dana Perino, wielded one of the nastiest barbs in journalism, saying the article was “not worth the paper it’s written on” — after including the usual complaint about the “quoting [of] unnamed sources.”

The Post, in turn, quickly corrected its report, which was the easy part. But the farther that false news spreads on the Web, the more likely it is to remain in circulation.

Nizza doesn't quote the original Jerusalem Post article, though he does quote two liberal blogs in order to make fun of them for believing the original Jerusalem Post article. He references the Jerusalem Post again with this "The Post, in turn, quickly corrected its report, which was the easy part. But the farther that false news spreads on the Web, the more likely it is to remain in circulation", but he doesn't actually quote them. When I pull up the JP link, this is what it actually says -- under a huge multi-color banner which reads "The Iranian Threat":

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 2FShowFull

May 20, 2008 11:00 | Updated May 20, 2008 22:25
White House denies Iran attack report
By JERUSALEM POST STAFF

The White House on Tuesday flatly denied an Army Radio report that claimed US President George W. Bush intends to attack Iran before the end of his term. It said that while the military option had not been taken off the table, the administration preferred to resolve concerns about Iran's push for a nuclear weapon "through peaceful diplomatic means."
[A US Navy aircraft carrier.]

A US Navy aircraft carrier.
Photo: AP
Slideshow: Pictures of the week

Army Radio had quoted a top official in Jerusalem claiming that a senior member in the entourage of President Bush, who visited Israel last week, had said in a closed meeting here that Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were of the opinion that military action against Iran was called for.

The official reportedly went on to say that, for the time being, "the hesitancy of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice" was preventing the administration from deciding to launch such an attack on the Islamic Republic.

The Army Radio report, which was quoted by The Jerusalem Post and resonated widely, stated that according to assessments in Israel, the recent turmoil in Lebanon, where Hizbullah has established de facto control of the country, was advancing an American attack.

And there's more. Something does not compute with the smirking tone Nizzi has taken, and what's actually in the Jerusalem Post 'correction'. Anyway, the related posts to this article are as compiled by the JP are:

RELATED

* McCain slams Obama for downplaying Iran threat
* Russian envoy: Don't push Iran into a corner
* Iran spurs arms race: 13 Mideast states have advanced nuclear programs

So who knows what's really going on, right? I accept that what I read as 'smirking' might just be neutral when someone else reads Nizzi. That was my editorializing on Nizzi's editorial.

And, yes, people did claim that invading Iraq would eventually lead to lower gas prices.

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 4:21 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote: Do you honestly believe that George W. Bush will ever be regarded in the same light as Truman? .

So, what you're saying is, all Chimpy has to do is drop a couple nukes to rehabilitate his legacy?

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 5:29 pm**

Cuda wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote: Do you honestly believe that George W. Bush will ever be regarded in the same light as Truman? .
So, what you're saying is, all Chimpy has to do is drop a couple nukes to rehabilitate his legacy?

Well, first he'd have to find an enemy that had attacked the U.S., you lockstep fucking tard.

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 6:04 pm**

Iran attaqcked us in 1979

Afghanistan attacked us on 9/11

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 6:09 pm**

A group of AT LEAST 20 Terrorists hijacked planes and attacked high profile targets (physically and nationally) in the US on September 11, 2001.

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 6:25 pm**

Cuda wrote:Iran attaqcked us in 1979

Afghanistan attacked us on 9/11

Are we currently at war with Iran?

And suggesting that we were attacked by Afghanistan is a reach at best, Cooter. Even for you.

Posted: **Wed May 28, 2008 6:27 pm**

mvscal wrote:
Cuda wrote:Afghanistan attacked us on 9/11
And we definitely blew a golden opportunity to nuke Afghanistan at Tora Bora.
It was the perfect set up.

Which would be yet another strike against the Commander in Chief?

T1B

Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!

Re: Pres Bush should be tried for MURDER!