T1B

mvscal wrote:He was feeling kind of left out during this weekend's Memorial Day observance. It must be kind of lonely hating on your country while everyone else is celebrating the men who made it great. Evidently, it must be such a lonely feeling that it compels one to tell lies in order to join in on the fun.

Obama also spoke about his uncle, who was part of the American brigade that helped to liberate Auschwitz. He said the family legend is that, upon returning from war, his uncle spent six months in an attic.

It's Nice Being More Equal Than Little People
The righteous wisdom of Barack Hussein Obama:

We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK. That's not leadership. That's not going to happen.

Of course, he didn't say anything about letting our chauffeurs drive our SUVs:

Cuda wrote:

It's Nice Being More Equal Than Little People
The righteous wisdom of Barack Hussein Obama:

We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK. That's not leadership. That's not going to happen.

Of course, he didn't say anything about letting our chauffeurs drive our SUVs:

NORTH LAS VEGAS, Nev. (AP) - Barack Obama's campaign says the candidate made a mistake when he said a great uncle helped liberate the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz during World War II.
Obama said Monday that his uncle was among the first U.S. troops at Auschwitz. But Auschwitz was liberated by Soviet forces.

The campaign said Tuesday that he named the wrong camp. They said it was actually Buchenwald.

Aides said his grandmother's brother, Charlie Payne, helped liberate a Buchenwald sub-camp in April 1945 as part of the 89th Infantry Division.

Critics had been questioning Obama's original comment mentioning Auschwitz.

mvscal wrote:Details are unimportant and, evidently, words don't matter at least they don't when Obumble is stepping all over his dick.

helped liberate a Buchenwald sub-camp in April 1945

mvscal wrote:He has "cleared everything up." It wasn't really his uncle and it wasn't really Auschwitz. It was some other relative at some other concentration camp.

mvscal wrote:Gotcha moments? You mean gotcha moments like their being no record of his great uncle serving in the Army at all?

Charles W. Payne, born 1924, enlisted 10 Nov '42, Navy, 6293977 REgistered, order #12019, Kansas City, Wyandotte Co., Board #4

Another day, another pathetic lie from the Obabble camp exposed.

Cuda wrote:That's his fucking uncle (allegedly) you pathetic betwetter

mvscal wrote:Prove that it isn't, fuckwit. His name is Charles W. Payne and he's from Kansas.

Go ahead and find a Charles W Payne from Kansas in the 89th Division in WW2.
Take your time.

http://89infdivww2.org//home/list_p.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Jon Payne, Obama’s maternal great uncle, told CNN that his older brother Charles returned from the war with photographs of concentration camps but did not want to talk about his experiences. Payne, 71, said he was unsure if his brother — who is 83 and still living in Chicago — took the photographs himself.

http://cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/27 ... e-mistake/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

B-Monica wrote: Jon Payne, Obama’s maternal great uncle, told CNN that his older brother Charles returned from the war with photographs of concentration camps but did not want to talk about his experiences. Payne, 71, said he was unsure if his brother — who is 83 and still living in Chicago — took the photographs himself..

Cuda wrote:
Monica, you poor misguided slut.

Cuda wrote:Monica, you poor misguided slut.

The point is that the only discoverable military record shows O'Bigot's "uncle" serving in the fucking NAVY, not the fucking ARMY (you do understand the difference, don't you?)

Wolfman wrote:Bri-- the Democrat Party is going to go down in the presidential election with a political lightweight at the top of the ticket---really pathetic for a party that had great leaders like FDR, Truman, and John Kennedy.

BSmack wrote:

Wolfman wrote:Bri-- the Democrat Party is going to go down in the presidential election with a political lightweight at the top of the ticket---really pathetic for a party that had great leaders like FDR, Truman, and John Kennedy.

Funny you should mention FDR, Truman and JFK. As I recall, all were seen as "lightweights" before taking the oath of office. I'd say Obama is in good company.

Tom In VA wrote: FDR got us into a quagmire thats lasted over half a century, Truman made the rest of the world hate us by being the only country to use nuclear weapons AND got us into a quagmire in North Korea - that's still going on and JFK, inched us closer to Vietnam and really didn't do much to ingratiate us in the hearts and minds of the global community with his maverick approach to the Soviet Union.

Martyred wrote:Obama's making nice for the kikes to vote for a schwartze.

War Wagon wrote: Are you drunk physically or metaphorically?

Or just trying to troll?

Tom In VA wrote:

War Wagon wrote: Are you drunk physically or metaphorically?

Or just trying to troll?

Neither, this is serious business. If Obama is like three men who got us into major wars, killing 400K+, 36K+ and 58K+ then - get back Jo Jo.

Germany never attacked the U.S., Japan was given no alternative but to strike out against our imperialistic designs on Hawaii and the South Pacific as we made them starve with embargos, and the people of Korea long to be together under the utopia of Communism (Haven't you seen Phibes post the wonderful pictures of people in North Korea enjoying themselves, prospering, and living life to the fullest ?) while the South Koreans are oppressed by U.S. corporate patronization and assimiliation of U.S. culture.

FDR and Truman thrust us into the world stage like no other President has before. Much of what the U.S. has had to deal with in terms of Foreign Policy is a direct result of the "victory" in WWII. England, France, Netherlands, - Europe at large was so beaten they lost control over their "possessions" throughout the globe. Hooked on the resources provided by those "possessions" somebody had to step up to ensure those goodies flowed freely - else Western Civilization collapse. That somebody has predominantly been the U.S.. It got us into Korea, Vietnam, the Cold War, and countless skirmishes in between - all ending up killing Americans.

If I was a citizen of a developing country, I'd be more afraid of Obama than McCain. First, the Democrats - when they run a war - don't fuck around. They use nukes, incendiary bombs, and engage in total war. McCain knows first hand what it's like to fuck with little people in the developing world, run up to him and say "We have ways to make him talk" in Vietnamese (Chúng tôi có những cách để làm bạn nói).

Actually, BSmack might be onto something. If being feared and respected is better than being liked - we might just need a Democrat in office. Nobody's kicked more ass in the 20th Century than a Democrat Administration.



Obama might just be the man we need.

Cuda wrote:Lighten up, mvs... you know how all nigs look alike; he probably just thought it was his uncle.

SunCoastSooner wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:

War Wagon wrote: Are you drunk physically or metaphorically?

Or just trying to troll?

Neither, this is serious business. If Obama is like three men who got us into major wars, killing 400K+, 36K+ and 58K+ then - get back Jo Jo.

Germany never attacked the U.S., Japan was given no alternative but to strike out against our imperialistic designs on Hawaii and the South Pacific as we made them starve with embargos, and the people of Korea long to be together under the utopia of Communism (Haven't you seen Phibes post the wonderful pictures of people in North Korea enjoying themselves, prospering, and living life to the fullest ?) while the South Koreans are oppressed by U.S. corporate patronization and assimiliation of U.S. culture.

FDR and Truman thrust us into the world stage like no other President has before. Much of what the U.S. has had to deal with in terms of Foreign Policy is a direct result of the "victory" in WWII. England, France, Netherlands, - Europe at large was so beaten they lost control over their "possessions" throughout the globe. Hooked on the resources provided by those "possessions" somebody had to step up to ensure those goodies flowed freely - else Western Civilization collapse. That somebody has predominantly been the U.S.. It got us into Korea, Vietnam, the Cold War, and countless skirmishes in between - all ending up killing Americans.

If I was a citizen of a developing country, I'd be more afraid of Obama than McCain. First, the Democrats - when they run a war - don't fuck around. They use nukes, incendiary bombs, and engage in total war. McCain knows first hand what it's like to fuck with little people in the developing world, run up to him and say "We have ways to make him talk" in Vietnamese (Chúng tôi có những cách để làm bạn nói).

Actually, BSmack might be onto something. If being feared and respected is better than being liked - we might just need a Democrat in office. Nobody's kicked more ass in the 20th Century than a Democrat Administration.



Obama might just be the man we need.

The democrats at that time were more conservative though as well Tom. Don't lose sight of that fact. That was a transition time in American politics. Previously it had been the Republicans that were the liberals and Democrats the conservatives.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Cuda wrote:Lighten up, mvs... you know how all nigs look alike; he probably just thought it was his uncle.

Of all Cuda posts, this one probably takes the cake.

The great-uncle was on Obama's mother's side, you imbecile. You know, the white side of the family.

mvscal wrote:When was the last time a Dem asked what you could do for your country instead of what your country can must do for you?
Pathetic really.

MT. VERNON, Iowa - Democrat Barack Obama on Wednesday advocated a major expansion of the Peace Corps, AmeriCorps and other national service programs, saying "This will be a cause of my presidency."

The Illinois senator said that the government is not keeping pace with those who want to serve. "We will create new opportunities for all of us to serve," he said at a rally at Cornell College.

Obama evoked the memory of President John F. Kennedy and his Peace Corps volunteers. "JFK made their service a bridge to the developing world," he said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22117627/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

mvscal wrote:More welfare programs wasn't what JFK had in mind. On...igger is no JFK.

• * Expand AmeriCorps from its current 75,000 positions to 250,000, with new units to deal with education, clean energy, health care and homeland security.
  * Expand service programs involving retired individuals and those over age 55.
  * Double the size of the Peace Corps from its current 7,800 volunteers to 16,000 by its 50th anniversary in 2012.
  * Set goals for middle-school and high-school students to serve 50 hours a year of public service, and for college students to serve 100 hours a year.

mvscal wrote:The Peace Corps and Americorps are welfare programs. How can you even pretend to deny that? They contribute absolutely nothing to the security or prosperity of the nation and serve no purpose other than to consume tax dollars.

mvscal wrote:Do you honestly believe that when JFK asked what you could do for your country he really meant how many tax dollars can you leach from the productive citizens of your country? Is that what he was trying to say?

Encouraging volunteerism is great, but both of those organizations are publically funded. It is straight up welfare and massive expansions of those programs neccessarily indicates a massive expansion of entitlement spending.

That is the diametric opposite of what JFK was talking about.