Page 1 of 3
Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:12 pm
by PSUFAN
"Post unto others as you would have them post unto you."
Yes: post a funny, and laugh at someone else's funny.
No: post a scrollwheel-breaking expanse of unicode that no one - not even you - will ever fucking read.
No: post somebody's personal info.
NO: IKYABWAI....because of course, what inevitably follows? IKYABWAI, SHITHEAD. Is that something any of us really want to read?
NO.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:26 pm
by Kierland
That's the best you can do? It wasn't even funney.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:34 pm
by RumpleForeskin
I can make this list happen.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:51 pm
by Get fucked
Get fucked.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 9:54 pm
by Wolfman
I'm siding with Sirfindafold on this !
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 10:06 pm
by Jay in Phoenix
Ewww, Wolfie, that just sounds plain old unsavory.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 10:07 pm
by War Wagon
PSUFAN wrote:"Post unto others as you would have them post unto you."
Huh?
So, you're wanting to shut the Board down, eh?
Get a grip. Adversity and strife (to some extent, not completely) are what keeps people coming back for more.
It's a give and take situation.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 10:26 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Wolfman wrote:I'm siding with Sirfindafold on this !
Did you have any alternative? Like...posting something
good?
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 11:07 pm
by trev
What if you're not really funny but like reading the funny?
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 11:20 pm
by Mikey
Don't worry trev, you're funny.
In your own way...
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 11:57 pm
by War Wagon
trev wrote:What if you're not really funny but like reading the funny?
Then you're a freeloader. Contribute, or fuck off. This ain't no damn peepshow... well, maybe it is.
Hang in there, trev. I've seen you take some savage abuse, but put up a decent defense.
As for the directive of
trying to be funny... some can and do, some can't and flame out miserably in the effort ('sup, me?) but at least they
tried. Better to have tried and failed than never to have tried at all. Or some happy horseshit like that.
For the rest, poptart will run them sooner or later.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 1:50 am
by Cuda
at least Dennard did his goddam laundry regularly
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 3:56 am
by PSUFAN
everybody skids, cuddles.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 4:35 am
by Mister Bushice
PSUFAN wrote:"Post unto others as you would have them post unto you."
Yes: post a funny, and laugh at someone else's funny.
No: post a scrollwheel-breaking expanse of unicode that no one - not even you - will ever fucking read.
No: post somebody's personal info.
NO: IKYABWAI....because of course, what inevitably follows? IKYABWAI, SHITHEAD. Is that something any of us really want to read?
NO.
This post of yours doesn't seem to fit any of the rules.
Did you just runnd yourself? Poptart will be not happy.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:40 am
by Chyna
PSUFAN wrote:"Post unto others as you would have them post unto you."
Yes: post a funny, and laugh at someone else's funny.
No: post a scrollwheel-breaking expanse of unicode that no one - not even you - will ever fucking read.
No: post somebody's personal info.
NO: IKYABWAI....because of course, what inevitably follows? IKYABWAI, SHITHEAD. Is that something any of us really want to read?
NO.
If posting personal info is actually prohibited here. . . [whisper] Then why is
Atom bomb
Pantload still allowed to post here?[/whisper]
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 6:02 am
by Jeff in SD
Because Y2k is stealing his ip address
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 9:04 am
by RadioFan
Chyna wrote:If posting personal info is actually prohibited here. . . [whisper] Then why is Atom bomb Pantload still allowed to post here?[/whisper]
Send a PM, but only if it's in a whisper.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 9:05 am
by RadioFan
Jeff in SD wrote:Because Y2k is stealing his ip address
Bwah!
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 12:39 pm
by War Wagon
PSUFAN wrote:everybody skids...
Mebbe' so, but not everybody takes a picture of it and then posts it for the whole damn world to see.
I gotta' ask, did you even know you had a brown stripe when the pic was taken?
Surely that wasn't intentional.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 3:53 pm
by Adelpiero
wasn't posting all rumplewife sightings a rule also?
she was sighted at the Royals game.
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/KCChowd/P5290049.jpg)
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 4:02 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Mine was better.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 7:37 pm
by Atomic Punk
Chyna wrote:
If posting personal info is actually prohibited here. . . [whaaaaa] Then why is Atom bomb Pantload still allowed to post here?[/whaaaaa]
'Cause you're too stupid? At least Terry and Buschice are with you. Dumbfucks come in three's.
Chyna wrote:
Bullshit, you pantywaisted faggot. You not only broke out a first name that was never used on these boards- you added a location and the person's picture.
Dead ringer.
Then you called me FAT!?
PSU is right though... If I did any of what you dumb bitches claim, then fire me from the boards. You stupid bitches got worked.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 7:47 pm
by Felix
Atomic Punk wrote: You stupid bitches got worked.
if by "worked" you mean the natives of Hiroshima and Nagasaki "worked" those atomic bombs, then yes, I'd agree
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 7:57 pm
by Atomic Punk
mvscal wrote:My forehead worked Evander Holyfield.
![Image](http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/boxing/news/2002/06/01/rahman_holyfield_ap/t1_rahman_all.jpg)
This coming from a loser that wants to see tits from these "babes."
No wonder you are 24/7 here.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 8:13 pm
by Atomic Punk
mvscal wrote:You photographed yourself in grannypanties and blasted it all over the internet. Any discussion of losers will find you at the bottom of the pile by default. You're in a lose-lose situation here. I suppose your perch on the plunger pony is a comfortably familiar situation for you, though.
Enjoy.
I blasted it all over the internet or did Margaret Hamilton?
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 8:27 pm
by Cuda
PSUFAN wrote:everybody skids, cuddles.
I don't
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 10:36 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Atomic Punk wrote:Chyna wrote:
If posting personal info is actually prohibited here. . . [whaaaaa] Then why is Atom bomb Pantload still allowed to post here?[/whaaaaa]
'Cause you're too stupid? At least Terry and Buschice are with you. Dumbfucks come in three's.
For about the 8 millionth time, I never took sides in your stupid board drama queen pissing match, you braindead sot.
But keep thinking I did. It just confirms the fact that you make KCPaul look like Einstein by comparison.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:26 am
by Atomic Punk
$20k/yr isn't much to live on. I suggest you save up and worry more about yourself than others. Quit taking sides with pathological lying bitches that have gained your trust on a board because you want to believe in what they say.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:28 am
by Dinsdale
So, now you've seen the error of your ways, and decided the "it was no big deal" defense wasn't working.
And you're now replacing it with "it was all a big lie"?
Biggest. Melt. EVAR.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:29 am
by Smackie Chan
Cuda wrote:PSUFAN wrote:everybody skids, cuddles.
I don't
You leave the whole tire?
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:35 am
by Atomic Punk
Dinsdale wrote:So, now you've seen the error of your ways, and decided the "it was no big deal" defense wasn't working.
And you're now replacing it with "it was all a big lie"?
Biggest. Melt. EVAR.
That was to me? What if what I've said all along is true? Any admin here taking your side? Kind of takes your statement down the shitter like the others. What is the "melt" you refer to BTW? Prove me wrong dude.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:39 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
You're getting played hard by third tier smack amateurs Mi...errr...AP.
Your paranoia involving a variable army of shit trolls from Canada has ossified your brain.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:42 am
by Atomic Punk
Martyred wrote:You're getting played hard by third tier smack amateurs Mi...errr...AP.
Your paranoia involving a variable army of shit trolls from Canada has ossified your brain.
You've just proved your an admin here Perk.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:42 am
by Chyna
Atomic Punk wrote:$20k/yr isn't much to live on. I suggest you save up and worry more about yourself than others. Quit taking sides with pathological lying bitches that have gained your trust on a board because you want to believe in what they say.
Oh my God. I'm a pathological liar? Because I posted a link to a picture of prancing about in a dead hooker's yellowed grannypanties?
So, if I tell you you looked hawt in them panties would you take a pic of yourself in a red teddy for me??
I swear I won't share them.
![logan :logan:](./images/smilies/hippy.gif)
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:44 am
by poptart
Atomic Drunk wrote:I blasted it (the pic of me in grannypanties) all over the internet or did Margaret Hamilton?
Who's Margaret Hamilton?
Is that one of the crack strippers ... who's names and SS #s you posted ... or is it one of the deceitful interweb message board wenches who are currently working you over?
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:48 am
by Atomic Punk
Chyna wrote:
Oh my God. I'm a pathological liar? Because I posted a link to a picture of prancing about in a dead hooker's yellowed grannypanties?
So, if I tell you you looked hawt in them panties would you take a pic of yourself in a red teddy for me??
I swear I won't share them.
![logan :logan:](./images/smilies/hippy.gif)
I wish you were attractive so it would be cool and all. You are the ugliest female that has posted on the boards in 10 years or so. I'll even take sides with Rumps on this one also.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:51 am
by Terry in Crapchester
Atomic Punk wrote:$20k/yr isn't much to live on. I suggest you save up and worry more about yourself than others. Quit taking sides with pathological lying bitches that have gained your trust on a board because you want to believe in what they say.
You forgot to post that my wife is fat and likes to suck black cock.
God and GOD, you suck.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:51 am
by Atomic Punk
poptart wrote:
Who's Margaret Hamilton?
You moved to Korea to be with a "babe" right? You might want to check out of this thread... seriously.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:54 am
by Atomic Punk
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
You forgot to post that my wife is fat and likes to suck black cock.
God and GOD, you suck.
I'll give you props for claiming to have a cock a black woman would suck. That's a tough order.
Re: Cul de Smack's GOLDEN RULE
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:59 am
by Chyna
Atomic Punk wrote:Chyna wrote:
Oh my God. I'm a pathological liar? Because I posted a link to a picture of prancing about in a dead hooker's yellowed grannypanties?
So, if I tell you you looked hawt in them panties would you take a pic of yourself in a red teddy for me??
I swear I won't share them.
![logan :logan:](./images/smilies/hippy.gif)
I wish you were attractive so it would be cool and all. You are the ugliest female that has posted on the boards in 10 years or so. I'll even take sides with Rumps on this one also.
Wall-eyed fatboy who makes Joe Piscopo look hot is calling anyone else ugly??
A man who dressed in women's panties -took pics of himself in said panties and mass e-mailed them to every chick on these boards trolling for pussy has got some nerve calling anyone ugly or a loser.
You also sent out cock shots, wtf was that all about??
And if I'm so darned ugly, why were you trying to hook up with me??