T1B

Sin,

no we won't

http://www.reuters.com/article/industry ... 4720080728" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

mvscal wrote:

How many points do you score for a bum?

Are you asking on behalf of the cancer?

paging the 40 days to live ted kennedy troll.

Mikey wrote:Sin,

no we won't

http://www.reuters.com/article/industry ... 4720080728" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

sooooooooooo let's see. i bet you didn't do any thread like this when Teddy Kennedy was diagnosed with cancer...and he DID kill someone.

pathetic.

We can breathe easier.

sin

Pedestrians

How do you "miss" someone who isn't gone yet?

What, don't have the basic common courtesy of waiting until it's official before you start celebrating?

Typical liberal.

Jsc810 wrote:I miss him on Crossfire. He made that show worth watching.

Braden v. Buchannan was better.

Mikey wrote:Robert Novak, We'll Miss You

War Wagon wrote:How do you "miss" someone who isn't gone yet?

Glad that third grade education is paying dividends, Wags.

We'll = We will = Future tense.

Hate to run grammar smack, but it had to be done.

I'd add "typical conservative," but that would be cliche.

Smackie Chan wrote:
We'll = We will = Future tense.

Hate to run grammar smack, but it had to be done.

I think the "We'll" is applying to the impending loss, not the passing.

Smackie Chan wrote: We'll = We will = Future tense.

= All our fate.

However, it's customary to not start threads eulogizing people until it's a fait accompli

Hate to run grammar smack..

Don't lie to me.

I'd add "typical conservative," but that would be cliche.

Yet you did add it... did you hate having to do that also?

There's nothing wrong with cliches, or old ('sup Dins?) adages for that matter.

My cliches can kick your cliches ass.

War Wagon wrote:

Smackie Chan wrote:We'll = We will = Future tense.

= All our fate.

I'm sure there's a point you're trying to make, but I'll be damned if I can find it.

However, it's customary to not start threads eulogizing people until it's a fait accompli

This was a eulogy thread? I guess I shoulda figgered that when I started gettin' all misty over Mikey's touching tribute.

My cliches can kick your cliches ass.

Don't make me run punctuation smack, too.

Isn't he dead yet?

Smackie Chan wrote:Don't make me run punctuation smack, too.

Throw in some spellcheck smack, go for the tardfecta.

Smackie Chan wrote: I'm sure there's a point you're trying to make, but I'll be damned if I can find it.

Sure you can.

We're all going to die Smackie. That = All our Fate. This you know.

I just find it distasteful to be remarking upon anybody's death a day too soon. Save it. As for Robert Novak, I'm sure he's going to rejoice in each day he has left.

So should we revel in each day we have left.

titlover wrote:

Mikey wrote:Sin,

no we won't

http://www.reuters.com/article/industry ... 4720080728" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

sooooooooooo let's see. i bet you didn't do any thread like this when Teddy Kennedy was diagnosed with cancer...and he DID kill someone.

pathetic.

What's really pathetic is your pissy whining response.

You do actually possess a pair of testicles, I assume.

Go, Ted, Go!! Dance on this piss-mutant Ziocon malignancy's grave. Do it!

Because it's right that vile selfish racist liars should fold unto hit-and-run ("Oh, I'm sorry, I've got a brain tumor") pathetic excuses just before they're rudely shown the door (think Roy Cohn--really!)

Because this entire hideous affliction to the natural body of man should be shed...Oh.. :

Dance, Teddy, dance! :wink:

Jsc810 wrote:I miss him on Crossfire. He made that show worth watching.

The Robert Novak line of questioning was always my favorite on that show.

Isn't it true, that ~ insert something ridiculous here ~ ..... i.e ....

Isn't it true, that you and your liberal friends want nothing more than to bring down the United States and make it a Third-World country by not supporing Ronald Reagan's policy of giving the freedom fighters in El Salvador a chance to keep that country safe for democracy?

Or

Isn't it true, that your real issue here is the defeat of the American Way of Life as we know it, by your moral relativism when it comes to the death penalty, homelessness and abortion?

Godspeed, Bob. I honestly hope dude is able to make a full recovery.

I think Bob will be the one dancing on ted's grave. Well, maybe not dance actually. Prolly more like he'll go for a ride in the vette, lose control and plow up ted's headstone.

War Wagon wrote:

Smackie Chan wrote: I'm sure there's a point you're trying to make, but I'll be damned if I can find it.

Sure you can.

We're all going to die Smackie. That = All our Fate. This you know.

Of course I know. That's why it seemed the only point you were trying to convey is that you have a remarkably firm grasp of the obvious, but a woeful dearth of ability to understand plain English. You asked, "How do you "miss" someone who isn't gone yet?" This question was presumably based on Mikey's thread title. It would have been a valid question had the title been, "... We Miss You." But it wasn't. To expand on what was likely meant by the title, it coulda been phrased for the simpletons among us (space permitting), "Robert Novak, since you're 77 and have recently been diagnosed with a brain tumor, meaning most of us will likely outlive you 'cuz you'll prolly be pushin' up daisies before too long, after you're dead, we will miss you. Sarcastic and crass as it may have been, it didn't warrant your question because it implied something that will take place in the future. I'd say it was a stupid question, but there are those who believe there are no stupid questions - just stupid people.

I'm here to help you, Wags.

I just find it distasteful to be remarking upon anybody's death a day too soon.

I know my primary reason for dropping into this shithole is for the tasteful discourse regularly found here.

Distastefulness is one of the more charming and appealing qualities of this board. Isn't that why we're all here?

As for Robert Novak, I'm sure he's going to rejoice in each day he has left.

So should we revel in each day we have left.

~sniffle~ Why do you waste your time here, Wags? Seems to me that with the obvious talent you have for touching people's hearts with the beauty of your words, you should be writing bestsellers with titles along the line of Chicken Soup for the Retarded Soul.

Mikey wrote:

titlover wrote:

Mikey wrote:Sin,

no we won't

http://www.reuters.com/article/industry ... 4720080728" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

sooooooooooo let's see. i bet you didn't do any thread like this when Teddy Kennedy was diagnosed with cancer...and he DID kill someone.

pathetic.

What's really pathetic is your pissy whining response.

You do actually possess a pair of testicles, I assume.

so i win the bet?

titlover wrote:

Mikey wrote:Sin,

no we won't

http://www.reuters.com/article/industry ... 4720080728" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

sooooooooooo let's see. i bet you didn't do any thread like this when Teddy Kennedy was diagnosed with cancer...and he DID kill someone.

pathetic.

You’d be wrong, which is pretty much par for the course.

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... =2&t=28187" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Novak thread is definitely getting a bit more run, though. Doesn’t say much for Novak that he’s reviled more than Teddy Kennedy in a forum that tilts to the right.

Goober McTuber wrote:

titlover wrote: bet you didn't do any thread like this when Teddy Kennedy was diagnosed with cancer...and he DID kill someone.

pathetic.

You’d be wrong, which is pretty much par for the course.

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... =2&t=28187" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So 40 dtl is a Mikey troll?!? I'll be dipped.

You've got it wrong Goobs. titsmeller is accusing me of not starting a thread when Kennedy was diagnosed, proving I guess that I'm politically biased, which is obviously pathetic. I also proves that I value a murderer who got away with it more than a hit and run driver who would use his brain tumor as an excuse for running a guy down with his Corvette. I guess that's pathetic too.

Diogenes wrote: inoperable brain cancer is 'an excuse'.

What's yours?

Mikey wrote:

Diogenes wrote: inoperable brain cancer is 'an excuse'.

What's yours?

For constantly confusing you?

The fact that you're a dumbfuck will do.

Mikey wrote:You've got it wrong Goobs. titsmeller is accusing me of not starting a thread when Kennedy was diagnosed, proving I guess that I'm politically biased, which is obviously pathetic. I also proves that I value a murderer who got away with it more than a hit and run driver who would use his brain tumor as an excuse for running a guy down with his Corvette. I guess that's pathetic too.

so i win the bet?

titlover wrote: so i win the bet?

If you were betting that you are universally regarded as a gibbering fucktard, yes, you win. Why the hell would you expect an obviously liberal poster to be taking shots at Ted Kennedy? Idiot.

Because not to would be pathetic?

titlover and diogenes should definitely get together sometime and have a contest to see who can be the most incoherent.
That might be interesting.

Mikey wrote:Because not to would be pathetic?

titlover and diogenes should definitely get together sometime and have a contest to see who can be the most incoherent.
That might be interesting.

just an observation in hypocrisy. you know, that stuff libs love to point out. :)

Goober McTuber wrote:a forum that tilts to the right.

If it tilts much farther, it'll fall over.

Never heard of him. Sounds like a right cunt.

Nishlord wrote:Never heard of him. Sounds like a right cunt.

He's the one who outed the CIA agent Valerie Plame in his newspaper column back in 2003. When the Bushites needed someone to do the dirtiest possible smearing, yet still maintain an aura of inside the beltway respectability, Novak was their man.

BTW-Nish...

Might wanna ditch that sig... since less than 5% of the world's population lives in the USA, illegals included.

Dinsdale wrote:BTW-Nish...

Might wanna ditch that sig... since less than 5% of the world's population lives in the USA, illegals included.

Does that mean that America is 200% gay?


(that's a rhetorical question, BTW)

BSmack wrote: outed the CIA agent Valerie Plame

You can't 'out' someone who isn't in. Or even an agent.

Dinsdale wrote:BTW-Nish...

Might wanna ditch that sig... since less than 5% of the world's population lives in the USA, illegals included.

I made it up when I was thinking of a new sig.

And oh, him. Cunt.

Smackie Chan wrote: Distastefulness is one of the more charming and appealing qualities of this board. Isn't that why we're all here?

Truthfully, I have no idea why any of us are here. The best reason I can come up with is that we have waaay too much time on our hands.

I suppose that's a good thing, in some ways. It means we're not out scrounging, our next meal.

apologies to Bob Dylan.

~sniffle~ Why do you waste your time here, Wags? Seems to me that with the obvious talent you have for touching people's hearts with the beauty of your words, you should be writing bestsellers with titles along the line of Chicken Soup for the Retarded Soul.

Now I remember why I'm here.

It keeps me humble.

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:He's the one who outed the CIA agent Valerie Plame in his newspaper column back in 2003. When the Bushites needed someone to do the dirtiest possible smearing, yet still maintain an aura of inside the beltway respectability, Novak was their man.

He was doing his job as journalist. The question of how such a completely clueless asshat like Joe Wilson got sent on such a sensitive assignment to Niger was germane.

Of course the answer is that his stupid cunt of a wife hooked him up with that junket so Joe could spend a week "sipping sweet mint tea" with government flunkies in Niger.

The question which remains unanswered and even unacknowledged to this day is exactly how would revealing Plame's identity "smear" Wilson? Maybe one of you dickless lib faggots can step up to the plate and take a crack at answering that one.

Babs, you lockstep clown, the act of an American--let alone a high American government official--outting an American agent for any reason is treasonous. The fact that Rove and Scooter decided to commit such a serious crime simply out of vengeful spite reveals clearly the utter depravity of the (unelected) cabal. As to the danger of outting her, this act put several field agents at risk. As for Joe Wilson's expertise, well again babs, he's an actual expert, while you're a Rove Monkey/Limpdick Parrot.

Neither you not Rove, nor the (now literally) malignant Novak, nor any of the other delusional right-wing hacks have offered any refutation of Wilson's credentials--or the accuracy of his findings. He was right. And yes, we're aware of the standard Cheney response--that he's still sure there was yellocake being shipped, etc. Yeah, yeah, the standard total bullshit offered by the most egregiously criminal--and incompentent--administration ever to steal a presidential election (twice).

Scooter got sentenced to six years for his depraved crime. Several of the other mincing minions (Meiers, Bolton, and Gonzalez) are currently being lined up for similar examination of their criminal behavior.

But Novak was a special case. A truly vile piece of shit--along the lines of Poedertz--who would lie, smear, attack and hiss as casually as a cheap hooker giving head. If you actually read his columns, he's straight out of the '50's Cold War ranting school. It's astonishing that such drivel could maintain a column on a major newspaper. Disgraceful, really.