T1B

Caption:

"Congratulations young man. You fucked an underage girl and knocked her up real good. Statutory rape? Hell no, you're just the kind of young stud we need to pump (heh) some life back into our party. In trouble? Hell no, you're gonna get up on stage and help me get elected. You're famous, boy!! Sky's the limit for you now!! Bet you weren't expecting ANY of this when you were tapping that fine young ass. Just tell me one thing. Does she give good head? Did you do her mom too? How was she? ...Ok three things...

Suck my dick, faggot.

Not all, Dio.

Agree or disagree whether kids should be "off limits," rack Kim Henry for speaking out.

RadioFan wrote:Not all, Dio.

Agree or disagree whether kids should be "off limits," rack Kim Henry for speaking out.

If you want to accuse an 18 year old of statutory rape against his fiance, you might want to know the age of consent first.

"You know it's gonna get stranger, so let's get on with the show"

mvscal wrote:Age of consent is 16 in Alaska.

That's cool. Then maybe big John could get some too. Or would he be considered to be in a "position of authority"?

Diogenes wrote:

RadioFan wrote:Not all, Dio.

Agree or disagree whether kids should be "off limits," rack Kim Henry for speaking out.

If you want to accuse an 18 year old of statutory rape against his fiance, you might want to know the age of consent first.

I guess you really can't read then.

RadioFan wrote:Agree or disagree whether kids should be "off limits," rack Kim Henry for speaking out.

I'll agree with her speaking her mind...

regardless how idiotic her point is.


Palin, as VP to a codger whose goiter may eat his brain and kill him soon, stands to be put in charge of managing the most powerful nation on earth.


Yet when it comes to running her own fucking household, which is undeniably her foremost responsibility, she's been an abject failure. Completely incompetent.


But I'm sure whn the subject comes to running 100,000,000 households, she'll suddenly realize the importance of her responsibilities, and sudden;y become a competent manager... she just needs the wake-up call that only the White House can provide.

Makes sense, right?

Fucking lunatics running the asylum, and you people are OK with it.


Beyond "ponderous."

He looks like the damn Crypt Keeper in that photo. Christ, almighty...

Pre-marital teen sex pays. That's the message that appears to be being sent by the values party.

What a freakshow.

I'm starting to feel bad for McCain. He deserves better.

Q, West Coast Style wrote:Pre-marital teen sex pays. That's the message that appears to be being sent by the values party.

What a freakshow.

I'm starting to feel bad for McCain. He deserves better.

I would have been all for him being allowed to pick his first choice. The only thing better than the Palin debacle would have been the all out riots that would have happened had Joe Lieberman's name been placed in nomination.

mvscal wrote:

Q, West Coast Style wrote:Pre-marital teen sex pays. That's the message that appears to be being sent by the values party.

It does? Are you retarded? Both of those kids are going to have grow up a little quicker then they probably had planned. Oh, well. That's life. Looks like they'll be doing this with the unconditional support of their families. Are those the values you're talking about? Do you even know what you're talking about?

Pays 4 that boy. He's looking at a chance at wealth and celebrity. All because he didn't jimmy up.

Better head to the doc to get the that zanex presciption doubled, m. We've still got 2 months till the election.

mvscal wrote:

Q, West Coast Style wrote:Pays 4 that boy. He's looking at a chance at wealth and celebrity.

He is? Is he a pro hockey prospect or something? If not, he's looking at a chance of working the fishing boats or oil fields like most everyone else in Alaska.

So . . . the Governor of Alaska OR the Vice PResident of the United States is going to allow her daughter and gradchild to live such a life????? Really nice values.

If Gramps and future Mother in Law get elected, I'd say he's well on his way to jumping on the Washington super-lobbyist gravy train. You know for a fact that Sarah Barracuda isn't going to let any daughter of hers go through life with a loser like the imbecile she married.

Mikey wrote:Suck my dick, faggot.

How do you know mvscal is of age, you fukking ped?

Mikey wrote:You know for a fact that Sarah Barracuda isn't going to let any daughter of hers go through life with a loser like the imbecile she married.

Why's he a loser and an imbecile?

Looks like a fine, upstanding man... and he could damn sure kick your ass in a snowmobile race.

Q, West Coast Style wrote:

mvscal wrote:

Q, West Coast Style wrote:Pays 4 that boy. He's looking at a chance at wealth and celebrity.

He is? Is he a pro hockey prospect or something? If not, he's looking at a chance of working the fishing boats or oil fields like most everyone else in Alaska.

So . . . the Governor of Alaska OR the Vice PResident of the United States is going to allow her daughter and gradchild to live such a life????? Really nice values.

what the fuck is wrong with "that kind of life"? lots of people seem to like it. you wouldn't last half a day

War Wagon wrote: Looks like a fine, upstanding man... and he could damn sure kick your ass in a snowmobile race.

You are a cretin.

Cretin? That's all you've got?

I'm an authentic cretin, you're a pale imitation of what you'd like to pretend to be, and not pulling it off very well.

Sorta' like Bace in drag.

War Wagon wrote:

Mikey wrote:You know for a fact that Sarah Barracuda isn't going to let any daughter of hers go through life with a loser like the imbecile she married.

Why's he a loser and an imbecile?

Looks like a fine, upstanding man... and he could damn sure kick your ass in a snowmobile race.

And I can prolly swim a lot faster, and would kick his ass on the golf course.
And any of this matters...why?

That suit is prolly the first one he's ever worn, though I certainly wouldn't hold that against him. I wear jeans and polo shirts to work myself.

Quite literally M.A.D

speaking of "Plugs" Bidet...

We'll Pursue Bush For His Crimes After We Win The Election

Go For It, Big Guy!

A lot of hot air to get peoples emotions and hopes up. As one comment on the video sight indicated, they've had plenty of time - the Democrats own the House and Senate - to investigate and pursue impeachment proceedings of Bush and Cheney.

I'd be shocked and truly surprised if they do so and even more shocked to see it succeed.

oh, i think they should absolutely go full speed ahead starting right this minute

RadioFan wrote:Not all, Dio.

Agree or disagree whether kids should be "off limits," rack Kim Henry for speaking out.

I'm in agreement here -- generally speaking.

However, when a political figure such as Sarah Palin insists on continuously using her family as political props -- well, the door swings both ways.

The issue here is hypocrisy. And Palin has that in spades.

mvscal wrote:McCain's only saving grace is that he is batshit crazy.

And that's different from what we have now, how, exactly?

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

mvscal wrote:McCain's only saving grace is that he is batshit crazy.

And that's different from what we have now, how, exactly?

Bush is batshit stupid.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

RadioFan wrote:Not all, Dio.

Agree or disagree whether kids should be "off limits," rack Kim Henry for speaking out.

I'm in agreement here -- generally speaking.

However, when a political figure such as Sarah Palin insists on continuously using her family as political props -- well, the door swings both ways.

The issue here is hypocrisy. And Palin has that in spades.

What the fuck are you talking about? Should she hide her kids? Pretend they don't exist?

If she was a man, they wouldn't bother with this sleaze, and if she was a Dem you'd be going batshit retarded.

Oh, only since the first time she was ever mentioned. You know, all that "I WAS IN A CRATE BEING PRODDED BY COMMUNISTS, AND SHE'S GOT A MINGE" stuff.

mvscal wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:However, when a political figure such as Sarah Palin insists on continuously using her family as political props --

This happened when?

Tom In VA wrote:A lot of hot air to get peoples emotions and hopes up. As one comment on the video sight indicated, they've had plenty of time - the Democrats own the House and Senate - to investigate and pursue impeachment proceedings of Bush and Cheney.

I'd be shocked and truly surprised if they do so and even more shocked to see it succeed.

One problem with the Democrats doing it now: they may own the House and Senate, but they do so only by the slimmest of majorities.

By most reasonable counts, the Democrats figure to pick up seats in both the House and Senate this year regardless of who wins the Presidential election. If the Democrats pick up 20-30 House seats and 8-9 Senate seats (the latter unlikely but at least possible), investigation of key members of the Bush Administration becomes much more promising, politically speaking.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:A lot of hot air to get peoples emotions and hopes up. As one comment on the video sight indicated, they've had plenty of time - the Democrats own the House and Senate - to investigate and pursue impeachment proceedings of Bush and Cheney.

I'd be shocked and truly surprised if they do so and even more shocked to see it succeed.

One problem with the Democrats doing it now: they may own the House and Senate, but they do so only by the slimmest of majorities.

By most reasonable counts, the Democrats figure to pick up seats in both the House and Senate this year regardless of who wins the Presidential election. If the Democrats pick up 20-30 House seats and 8-9 Senate seats (the latter unlikely but at least possible), investigation of key members of the Bush Administration becomes much more promising, politically speaking.

Translation...

If they try this silly shit now they lose both houses of Congress as well as the presidency.

They may be political hacks and pussies but they aren't that stupid.

Diogenes wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:A lot of hot air to get peoples emotions and hopes up. As one comment on the video sight indicated, they've had plenty of time - the Democrats own the House and Senate - to investigate and pursue impeachment proceedings of Bush and Cheney.

I'd be shocked and truly surprised if they do so and even more shocked to see it succeed.

One problem with the Democrats doing it now: they may own the House and Senate, but they do so only by the slimmest of majorities.

By most reasonable counts, the Democrats figure to pick up seats in both the House and Senate this year regardless of who wins the Presidential election. If the Democrats pick up 20-30 House seats and 8-9 Senate seats (the latter unlikely but at least possible), investigation of key members of the Bush Administration becomes much more promising, politically speaking.

Translation...

If they try this silly shit now they lose both houses of Congress as well as the presidency.

They may be political hacks and pussies but they aren't that stupid.

Not likely.

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/S ... p05-s.html They have a majority in the Senate, and only 12 seats to defend in this cycle. Of those, Lautenberg faces the closest challenger, and he has a 15 point lead. Even if the Republicans hold serve on all of their seats across the board (extremely unlikely), it'll be almost impossible for them to make up any ground in the Senate. The Republicans' best shot at a Senate Majority would be if Willie Tanner switched party affiliation.

As for the Democrats being incredibly politically stupid, I don't think it's possible to misunderestimate that. The last 25-30 years out front told me so.

mvscal wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:A lot of hot air to get peoples emotions and hopes up.

Of course it is. (PUT ANY CANDIDATES NAME HERE) entire campaign is predicated on flim-flam and bullshit.

ftfy.