T1B

Seriously. That one was horrible. blah blah blah blah blah I feel somewhat compelled to vote for the least yawn inducing of the candidates, if there was one for whom that label would qualify.

I can't wait to hear from Bortz and Hannity tomorrow - yeah I listen to them everyday.

I guarandamnteeya it will be about not saying anything about Wright and Ayers.

battery chucka' one wrote:Seriously. That one was horrible.

Must suck to see your whole world view be utterly discredited. No wonder you're so angst ridden.

BSmack wrote:

battery chucka' one wrote:Seriously. That one was horrible.

Must suck to see your whole world view be utterly discredited. No wonder you're so angst ridden.

Please, do elaborate.

I'm just amazed that we have McCain as a nominee when either Thompson or Romney would be lapping Obama right now. Stupifying.

Thompson?? lol


Take a long view, 'chucka.

The chances of a 'real' conservative emerging in '12 are greater if Obama is elected now rather than if another fake conservative like McCain is elected.

jmo


But I DO feel your pain.

Hard to imagine our country going so far down the crapper that a majority of voters appear to think that they ought to place a complete @sswipe like B.O. into the highest office in the land.

BSmack wrote:

battery chucka' one wrote:Seriously. That one was horrible.

Must suck to see your whole world view be utterly discredited. No wonder you're so angst ridden.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1575

Keep deluding yourself, comrade.

rozy wrote:

BSmack wrote:Must suck to see your whole world view be utterly discredited. No wonder you're so angst ridden.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1575

Keep deluding yourself, comrade.

I'd hardly call it deluding myself when the outlier poll provided to you twats by Drudge shows Obama up by two. Meanwhile you're neglecting yesterday's results from, Gallup, Rasmussen, Survey USA, Ipsos/McClatchy...

And after last night, Obama's lead will only solidify.

I noticed you finally gave up on passing off Zogby's electoral map as useful information. Good move if you ask me.

I am not sure why you're so inclined to follow these polls so closely. Wasn't Kerry so far ahead in these polls 4 years ago?

As far as the debate goes, RACK Tom Brokaw for calling them both out. Watching those two duck around the questions was brutal. Neither candidate seemed to have any grasp on the economy and their answers weren't very reassuring. I'd like to see how Obama is not going to tax the middle class in order to have his healthcare package pushed through. Not sure I like McCain's response to the healthcare package either.

MuchoBulls wrote:I'd like to see how Obama is not going to tax the middle class in order to have his healthcare package pushed through. Not sure I like McCain's response to the healthcare package either.

Isn't it B.O.'s paln to almost double the capital gains tax in order to pay for all of his ridiculous bullshit?

Capital ... gains??

:doh:



bwaa ...

BSmack wrote:
I'd hardly call it deluding myself

of course not- you're a dumbfuck

MuchoBulls wrote:I am not sure why you're so inclined to follow these polls so closely. Wasn't Kerry so far ahead in these polls 4 years ago?

No. Bush led through all of October, with the exception of a couple isolated days

Obama wins.

It really is a done deal.


What's more disconcerting is the fact the Democrats will also probably get a 63 seat majority in the Senate.

Oh well, looks like the "RINO" infiltration worked.

Tom In VA wrote:Obama wins.

It really is a done deal.


What's more disconcerting is the fact the Democrats will also probably get a 63 seat majority in the Senate.

Oh well, looks like the "RINO" infiltration worked.

Not even the 538 guys are forecasting Dems picking up 14 seats. Is this some kind of troll job Tom?

BSmack wrote: Not even the 538 guys are forecasting Dems picking up 14 seats. Is this some kind of troll job Tom?

Not unless your man Chucky is trolling.

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/sch ... 10-08.html

In a press conference at Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) headquarters, Schumer said the path and pattern of the contributions indicate that the Chamber is afraid of the Democrats winning the critical Senate threshold of 60 seats — a goal he said is within reach now more than ever.

I heard that as well. Someone went thru the list and predicted wins for a bunch of dems, for example Al Franken was predicted to win Over Coleman.

Sucks for us when either party has both the presidency and the congressional majority, but we're fucked pretty much no matter who wins, anyway.

mvscal wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:Sucks for us when either party has both the presidency and the congressional majority,

There is only an illusion of choice between two different parties.

While the two parties are indistinguishable, there is something to be said for the two wings of the Republicrat Party infighting, so as to slow down the process of them actually doing anything.


It's when everyone in DC agees on something that we're really fucked.

mvscal wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:Sucks for us when either party has both the presidency and the congressional majority,

There is only an illusion of choice between two different parties.

That's not the point. THEY think they're members of different parties, so when they get a majority everywhere, then there is little reason for them to do any real work. They just agree on everything they want implemented, and never let anything else make it out of committee for a vote.

Dinsdale wrote:

It's when everyone in DC agees on something that we're really fucked.

true, and that's whats frightening

I've sent off to Rosetta Stone for a crash course in Canadian