Page 1 of 1

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 7:10 pm
by Voice of Reason
mvscal: Melting again

nobody: caring again

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:29 pm
by Mister Bushice
He has a point.

When Mr. "Hope for change" starts hiring the same old corrupt assholes who are running things now for his administration it makes the concept of "change" a fucking joke.

Same old same old is what we will end up with.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:49 pm
by Wolfman
Not quite sure of the exact quote, but I do remember Barry O spouting off in those endless commercials we were subjected to--- that no lobbyists in his administration ! Sure.
What a lying sack of crap he is ! What's worse is that none of the fanatics that voted for him will ever call him out on it . It's going to be a long haul till 2012 !

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 5:17 am
by Mikey
We should all feel lucky to have such a vigilant watchdog like mvscal keeping an eye on things for us.
How else can we ever sleep at night?

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 5:46 am
by Terry in Crapchester
Your boy is still leaving on January 20. Sorry you had to find out this way.

But don't worry. You'll probably get your wish soon enough.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:24 pm
by Mister Bushice
As if Daschle being involved in this administration isn't enough?

It certainly can't hurt having an insider like your spouse on the cabinet. It's all about connections.

And don't tell me a stinking turd like daschle won't use it for his /his wifes benefit?

Just that fact Obama made it clear he wasn't going down the road of having Washington being run by special interests makes you wonder why he wouldn't see this as a bad move.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 4:40 pm
by titlover
Mace wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Mace wrote:it's a stretch trying to make a "conflict of interest" out of his wife being a lobbyist. If that's all you got, then you got nothing.
Only a stretch to a brainless, excuse making fucktard. Anyone able to fire three synapses at a time can easily understand the conflict of interest between the Secretary of Health and Human Services and his wife who will be lobbying the Federal government on health care issues.
Oh, I can understand how it could become a conflict of interest, but only if he allows his wife to influence his decision making. You, and the other braindead conspiracy theorists, have already got him doing that before he officially becomes a member of the cabinet. Nice job, dickweed.

it's the appearance that isn't kosher. it isn't appropriate at all.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 4:43 pm
by Mikey
titlover wrote:

it's the appearance that isn't kosher. it isn't appropriate at all.
I know the red glasses look ridiculous, but I don't think that's enough to disqualify him from the job.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 4:32 pm
by smackaholic
I'm sure he's a pro bono fellator like countless others.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:26 pm
by Goober McTuber
smackaholic wrote:I'm sure he's a pro bono fellator like countless others.
I believe that's spelled "pro boner".

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:32 pm
by Smackie Chan
Birdy wrote:Why any dumbfuck replies to you is amazing
Wow! Where does one start? KYOA much?

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:26 am
by Mister Bushice
I still think Obama strayed from his message of "No lobbyists in my administration", because I believe that Daschle (former lobbyist with strong ties) and his wife (current lobbyist with even stronger ties) will do pretty much anything to further their own self interests and personal power and wealth because that is what they have always done, and having a husband on the inside, on the presidential cabinet in the executive branch of the government that you're lobbying to will not ever suck very much in terms of furthering your agenda.

Look to see the aviation industry prosper over the next 4 years.

However I would like to see mvscal step up and bite the bullet on this fuckup. This chick has no health care ties. At all as far as I can see.

Dude. You fucked up. Step up.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:01 pm
by Justa Pickle
mvscal wrote:
you gibbering dumbfuck.


At the risk of being accused of sukkking black cokkk, I want to say.....



RACK MVSCAL!


I don't think I'll ever get tired of reading those words. Especially when the recipient really is a bleeding heart, liberal, gibbering dumbfuck!

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:19 pm
by Goober McTuber
Justa Pickle wrote:
mvscal wrote:
you gibbering dumbfuck.


At the risk of being accused of sukkking black cokkk, I want to say.....



RACK MVSCAL!
Is he still sending you supportive emails?

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:34 pm
by Justa Pickle
Goober McTuber wrote:
Is he still sending you supportive emails?

Nope. :(


I've offered to met him for a beer at Mutt Lynch's in Newport Beach with my good friend Jimmy Medalions or somewhere else in that vincity. He always declines, but I don't take it personally.

I find mvscal to be one of the greatest posters in internet history and I agree with him 99.999 percent of the time. About the only disagreement we have are his accusations about me and blackkk cokkk. Truth be told, he knows that Stanley Pickle don't do blackkk cokkk, but he says it anyway for your amusement

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:46 pm
by Justa Pickle
mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Is he still sending you supportive emails?
I've always been very active in the community and supportive of people in their efforts to actualize their suicidal impulses, especially around the holidays.

I just don't really like to advertise my charitable contributions. Helping people off themselves is reward enough for me.


Oh my God.....this guy is a riot! :lol: :lol: :lol:



I don't think enough of you people realize what we are priviledged to read everyday. Every mvscal post is pure solid gold. He should be a national treasure for the entire nation to enjoy.
I feel sad and joy at the same time. Sadness that you fukkks take every mvscal post for granted yet joy that I am lucky enough to view them.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 7:20 pm
by upstart
I agree most of mvcal's posts are pure solid gold.I don't post much but I do love to see him melting the moonbats.

:lol:

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:09 am
by Bennish
mvscal wrote:
Mace wrote:it's a stretch trying to make a "conflict of interest" out of his wife being a lobbyist. If that's all you got, then you got nothing.
Only a stretch to a brainless, excuse making fucktard. Anyone able to fire three synapses at a time can easily understand the conflict of interest between the Secretary of Health and Human Services and his wife who will be lobbying the Federal government on health care issues.
Hildebeast as Secretary of State is actually unconstitutional, but nobody is going to give a shit about that either.
According to the Ineligibility Clause of the United States Constitution, no member of Congress can be appointed to an office that has benefited from a salary increase during the time that Senator or Representative served in Congress. A January 2008 Executive Order signed by President Bush during Hillary Clinton's current Senate term increased the salary for Secretary of State, thereby rendering Senator Clinton ineligible for the position.

Specifically, Article I, section 6 of the U.S. Constitution provides "No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time." The provision is seen by most as designed by our Founding Fathers to protect against corruption.

"There's no getting around the Constitution's Ineligibility Clause, so Hillary Clinton is prohibited from serving in the Cabinet until at least 2013, when her current term expires," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Barack Obama should select someone who is eligible for the position of Secretary of State and save the country from a constitutional battle over Hillary Clinton's confirmation. No public official who has taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution should support this appointment. And aside from the constitutional issue, Hillary Clinton's long track record of corruption makes her a terrible choice to serve as the nation's top diplomat."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2008/ ... ecretary-s

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:33 am
by poptart
SG wrote:I'm just wondering how anybody could have been fooled by this damn jive talkin' Sambo.
Because America is a nation full of dumbfucks.

Just look at this board.

And as dumb as "we" are here, collectively, "we" are among the brighter folks in America.


Maybe?

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 5:38 pm
by Diego in Seattle
Bennish wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Mace wrote:it's a stretch trying to make a "conflict of interest" out of his wife being a lobbyist. If that's all you got, then you got nothing.
Only a stretch to a brainless, excuse making fucktard. Anyone able to fire three synapses at a time can easily understand the conflict of interest between the Secretary of Health and Human Services and his wife who will be lobbying the Federal government on health care issues.
Hildebeast as Secretary of State is actually unconstitutional, but nobody is going to give a shit about that either.
According to the Ineligibility Clause of the United States Constitution, no member of Congress can be appointed to an office that has benefited from a salary increase during the time that Senator or Representative served in Congress. A January 2008 Executive Order signed by President Bush during Hillary Clinton's current Senate term increased the salary for Secretary of State, thereby rendering Senator Clinton ineligible for the position.

Specifically, Article I, section 6 of the U.S. Constitution provides "No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time." The provision is seen by most as designed by our Founding Fathers to protect against corruption.

"There's no getting around the Constitution's Ineligibility Clause, so Hillary Clinton is prohibited from serving in the Cabinet until at least 2013, when her current term expires," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Barack Obama should select someone who is eligible for the position of Secretary of State and save the country from a constitutional battle over Hillary Clinton's confirmation. No public official who has taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution should support this appointment. And aside from the constitutional issue, Hillary Clinton's long track record of corruption makes her a terrible choice to serve as the nation's top diplomat."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/news/2008/ ... ecretary-s
Try mixing in a newspaper every now & then, dumbfuck.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:55 am
by RadioFan
mvscal wrote:I just don't really like to advertise my charitable contributions. Helping people off themselves is reward enough for me.
One of my resolutions this year is to help Toddowen. Let's do this. You can take point and I'll be the wingman. Hey, it's for a good cause and all.

Re: Onogger: Lying again

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:57 am
by RadioFan
poptart wrote:And as dumb as "we" are here, collectively, "we" are among the brighter folks in America.


Maybe?
No shit. American Idol, the Biggest Loser and Super Bowl halftime shows out front, bro.

Gaza?

Ghaah ... where the hell is that, anyway? Don't bother me with anything serious.