T1B

These threads "morphed" into a weekly game, so things were run a little loose.

Props to those who took part.

Big ups to BSmack, who wears the crown.

Nice pickin'!




Standings

REAL playahs
BSmack 27-12 69%
Scott: 22-15 59%
Adelpiero: 18-14 56%
Sirfindafold: 10-8 56%
Louis: 17-15 53%
poptart: 24-22 52%
godzilla: 20-19 51%
S'_Michigan 9-9 50%
Goober: 17-20 46%
Shoalzie: 18-23 44%
H'Mom: 14-19 42%



Stragglers, jag-offs, and homos (15 picks or less)
no-F-N-Joke: 1-0 100%
Wagon: 1-0 100%
Dio: 10-2 83%
orc: 9-3 75%
mvscal: 2-1 67%
Nacho: 2-1 67%
R-Jack: 2-1 67%
ucant: 8-5 62%
C'Mike: 4-5 44%
Degenerate: 3-5 38%
Nixhex 2-4 33%
Cuda: 4-10 29%
Mgo: 1-5 17%
Rumps: 0-1 0%
PISC: 0-0 0%

poptart wrote:Standings

REAL playahs
BSmack 27-12 69%
Scott: 22-15 59%
Adelpiero: 18-14 56%
Sirfindafold: 10-8 56%
Louis: 17-15 53%
poptart: 24-22 52%
godzilla: 20-19 51%
S'_Michigan 9-9 50%
Goober: 17-20 46%
Shoalzie: 18-23 44%
H'Mom: 14-19 42%



Stragglers, jag-offs, and homos (15 picks or less)
no-F-N-Joke: 1-0 100%
Wagon: 1-0 100%
Dio: 10-2 83%
orc: 9-3 75%
mvscal: 2-1 67%
Nacho: 2-1 67%
R-Jack: 2-1 67%
ucant: 8-5 62%
C'Mike: 4-5 44%
Degenerate: 3-5 38%
Nixhex 2-4 33%
Cuda: 4-10 29%
Mgo: 1-5 17%
Rumps: 0-1 0%
PISC: 0-0 0%

I totally forgot about this shit.

Adjust the rules all you want with me out of the room. I still win.

Why would someone want to draw attention to themselves for not being a real playah?

trev wrote:Why would someone want to draw attention to themselves for not being a real playah?

Why would someone want to redefine "real playah" to exclude the board leader after he has been temporarily banned? :twisted:

Gee, I wonder...

Enjoy your asterisk, B.

R-Jack wrote:Since your football prognostications were the cause of your ban, your claim of an asterisk has zero merit.

Since if I would have won said bet if I took the points (still made $$$ on my parley that week, BTW) and this contest was all about the spread...

Long live the asterisk.

Diogenes wrote:

R-Jack wrote:Since your football prognostications were the cause of your ban, your claim of an asterisk has zero merit.

Since if I would have won said bet if I took the points (still made $$$ on my parley that week, BTW) and this contest was all about the spread...

Long live the asterisk.

Coulda, woulda.... DIDN'T!

And that's really all that matters.

BSmack* wrote:

Diogenes wrote:

R-Jack wrote:Since your football prognostications were the cause of your ban, your claim of an asterisk has zero merit.

Since if I would have won said bet if I took the points (still made $$$ on my parley that week, BTW) and this contest was all about the spread...

Long live the asterisk.

Coulda, woulda.... DIDN'T!

And that's really all that matters.

Whatever.

Congratulations*.

poptart wrote:These threads "morphed" into a weekly game, so things were run a little loose.

If a person picked 3 games each week, he would have had 51 games total picked for the season.
I, for example, had 46 games picked -- with 5 pushes.

Dio had ... 12 ... games picked all season.


That IS the definition of a straggler or jag-off.

And he's very likely a homosexual, too.

poptart wrote:

poptart wrote:These threads "morphed" into a weekly game, so things were run a little loose.

If a person picked 3 games each week, he would have had 51 games total picked for the season.
I, for example, had 46 games picked -- with 5 pushes.

Dio had ... 12 ... games picked all season.


That IS the definition of someone who was only eligible for four weeks.

And he's very likely a homosexual, too.

FTFY.

And no. Not that your football 'knowledge' couldn't be overcome by your average homo...

The solution next year Diogebannedfortheseasones is to not make ban bets. Especially when you're taking the Cards.

Sorry, but you claiming that you won this thing is like some slappy with a .437 average with 100 plate appearances claiming that he should have won the National League batting title last year. Besides, you could have made some more early season picks. That is, if your football expertise extended beyond the desire to penetrate Kurt Warner's sigmoid.

B* wrote:

69%>83%.

Good to know.

Diogenes wrote:

B* wrote:

69%>83%.

Good to know.

Well in that case, 100%>83%. All Hail Wags and no-F-N-Joke, our new kings.

Either way, YOU LOSE.

Hey, if'n I knew 'tart was going to make such a big deal outta' this, maybe I would've tried harder. Call me a straggler. I promise not be put in the jag-off or homo category this year.

War Wagon wrote:Hey, if'n I knew 'tart was going to make such a big deal outta' this, maybe I would've tried harder. Call me a straggler. I promise not be put in the jag-off or homo category this year.

It's OK to be a straggler, as long as your winning percentage is better than Dio's.

BSmack wrote:The solution next year Diogebannedfortheseasones is to not make ban bets. Especially when you're taking the Cards.

Dio and Ucant should get together for a beer. They could share a lot of betting advice.

trev wrote:Dio and Ucant should get together for a beer. They could share a lot of betting advice.

Still bitter about being trolled, huh?

What did you really think was the reasoning behind a Cardinals fan calling for a "death penalty bet" in which the Astros had to sweep a 4 game series on the road against the Giants in the middle of May?

Did the stakes not give you any idea at all as to why I made the bet? You could be getting fucked in the ass by Colonel Mustard with the Candlestick in the motherfucking Ballroom and still not have any fucking clue. Wow... are you stupid.

Ahhhhh, trolling.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

trev wrote:Dio and Ucant should get together for a beer. They could share a lot of betting advice.

Still bitter about being trolled, huh?

What did you really think was the reasoning behind a Cardinals fan calling for a "death penalty bet" in which the Astros had to sweep a 4 game series on the road against the Giants in the middle of May?

Did the stakes not give you any idea at all as to why I made the bet? You could be getting fucked in the ass by Colonel Mustard with the Candlestick in the motherfucking Ballroom and still not have any fucking clue. Wow... are you stupid.

Ahhhhh, trolling.

You are so full of it. You have a history of quitting and coming back. You just can't stay away. It's ok, I like having you around, you big lug.

trev wrote:You have a history of quitting and coming back. You just can't stay away.

Things like starting a family, getting my MBA, and furthering my career have had a way of cutting into my time here with you.

It's called having a life. A productive one. Most people's day consist of just a little bit more than worrying about whose dick you'll have to suck for your gin and tonic, lush. Try it out sometime.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

trev wrote:You have a history of quitting and coming back. You just can't stay away.

Things like starting a family, getting my MBA, and furthering my career have had a way of cutting into my time here with you.

It's called having a life. A productive one. Most people's day consist of just a little bit more than worrying about whose dick you'll have to suck for your gin and tonic, lush. Try it out sometime.

Maybe you should quit again. Even if you do, you'll still have a higher posting percentage than I.