Page 1 of 1

Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:47 pm
by Q, West Coast Style
That third Beaver goal in stoppage time was the icing on the cake.

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:50 pm
by SunCoastSooner
The Beavers just had more stamina on the pitch in their back line.

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:55 pm
by PSUFAN
Good lord, Pitt is fucking awful... :lol:

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:00 pm
by Dinsdale
Absolute barnburner.

Keep airing it up on those extra-windy days. Seems like a plan.


4-0 for the CoC.

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:04 pm
by Q, West Coast Style
PSUFAN wrote:Good lord, Pitt is fucking awful... :lol:

Tony Dorsett was there on the sideline. They should've tried sneaking him onto the field in uniform.

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:12 pm
by The Seer
Pac 1

now 4-0...


funny how the Pac 1 is always shitty until they play outta conference in bowl season.





not that my dog is in the fight

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:24 pm
by PSUFAN
Well, that victory wasn't much to chest-thump about...

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:25 pm
by PSUFAN
btw - that was the best showing for Pitt's cheerleading squad that I've seen in a while. They had been pretty talent-deficient in that area in the recent past.

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:36 am
by PISC
What a weak conference. SC is so over rated and has been for years.

Alright, time to get the gear and beer ready for tomorrow.

Fight on and fuck off!

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:43 am
by PSUFAN
What happened to your sig line?

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 6:30 pm
by MuchoBulls
PSUFAN wrote:Good lord, Pitt is fucking awful... :lol:
I can't believe we freaking lost to the 'stache.

Re: Oregon State 3, Pitt nil.

Posted: Thu Jan 01, 2009 8:01 pm
by Dinsdale
Sudden Sam wrote:I didn't catch any of this game. Were the offenses: __More inept __As inept __Better than the Vandy and BC Os?

You obviously didn't see any of the game -- using the word "offenses" is being far too generous.

Although in fairness, both team were making good defensive adjustments... but how much adjusting is there to 3 and outs?

Also in fairness, the wind appeared to be howling pretty good, so the defenses were pretty much packing the box, and trusting some pretty loosesecondary play to shut down the passing game... well, the wind was shutting down the passing game... which you'd think as much as they play in the rain, Riley & Co could have found a lot more short routes to put in. And the wind was doing a number on the kicking game.

No passing + packed box + no kicking = 3-0