Page 1 of 2
Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:10 pm
by Bobby42
Wolf Blitzer is peeing on himself. Alot of activity involved in rescue. Appears all passengers are safe.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:15 pm
by Sirfindafold
who gives a fuck?
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:17 pm
by Bobby42
Put you head between your legs. Hold tight. Yeah, that's just what they did.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:34 pm
by L45B
US Scareways. Go figure.
Wonder if the passengers have to pay an additional $20 for the inflatable device?
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:41 pm
by Bobby42
That's a damn good pilot. He set her down nice and easy.
/sin/

Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:00 pm
by Left Seater
Rack the Joe Patroni reset.
Joe Patroni: "You might fly these things but I take them apart and put them back together again. If you had any guts we'd be on the runway by now."
Posters calling pilots cowards in 3...2...1...
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:04 pm
by War Wagon
Pretty remarkable job by the pilot, it would seem. I want to hear what he has to say.
Goddamn terrorist geese did this. Why do we allow these scum into the country? Deport them all back to Canada.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:13 pm
by Bobby42
Not geese but it was a big mofu goose. Serious violation of U.S. airspace.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:13 pm
by Left Seater
No doubt. We practice this stuff all the time, but there is a huge difference between the sim and doing it with pax in the back.
Huge luck also in that it reached the ferry terminal area of the Hudson. Allowed a quick response which prolly prevented hypothermia deaths.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:21 pm
by L45B
Just found out that a guy I work with was on that flight. He confirmed he is okay.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:24 pm
by Bobby42
L45B wrote:Just found out that a guy I work with was on that flight. He confirmed he is okay.
Glad to know it. Let us know what you learn of his POV.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:27 pm
by Left Seater
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:29 pm
by Bobby42
Outstanding rescue effort. Congrats to all involved.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:31 pm
by KC Scott
Damn - I just flew home from NY yesterday - glad it was out of Newark ---- errrr... except for the $80 cab rides
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:33 pm
by War Wagon
L45B wrote:Just found out that a guy I work with was on that flight.
Small world, eh?
I was watching CNN after just getting home from work and it's amazing how fast information travels these days.
Wolf Blitzer had a passenger on his cell phone less than an hour after the crash.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:33 pm
by Left Seater
Now reporting that plane went down abeam 50th street and is currently around 13th. Tide is heading out and quick.
Looks like the FDNY boats are now tied up to the plane and they are towing it to ???????
KC Scott, NJTransit next time. Takes you right to Newark in half the time of a cab and for $12.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:35 pm
by KC Scott
Left Seater wrote:
KC Scott, NJTransit next time. Takes you right to Newark in half the time of a cab and for $12.
I was in Manhattan and my hotel said no bus or shuttle - the only option was car / taxi or I could try and figure out the Subway
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:38 pm
by War Wagon
Left Seater wrote:Now reporting that plane went down abeam 50th street and is currently around 13th. Tide is heading out and quick.
Looks like the FDNY boats are now tied up to the plane and they are towing it to ???????
Probably just along for the ride and trying to keep it from sinking at this point. Those boats aren't equipped to tow an Airbus.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:43 pm
by War Wagon
Fuck you.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:48 pm
by Left Seater
KC Scott,
If you return to NYC. Go to Penn Station. Take any New Jersey Transit train on either the Northeast Corridor Line or the North Jersey Coast Line. Both stop at Newark Airport. Then walk across the platform and get on the Monorail to the terminal. Simple, easy, fast, and much cheaper.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:53 pm
by Tom In VA
Left Seater,
A comment on a news website I read pertaining to this makes the claim it isn't the bird itself as much as it's - according to the poster there - the "metal ring around it's neck for tracking" that screws things up.
The contention seems to be the bird flesh alone wouldn't cause a jet engine to sieze up as it would simply get liquified - like hitting puree on a blender - but objects affixed to a bird that cause it.
Any thoughts ?
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:54 pm
by BSmack
Left Seater wrote:KC Scott,
If you return to NYC. Go to Penn Station. Take any New Jersey Transit train on either the Northeast Corridor Line or the North Jersey Coast Line. Both stop at Newark Airport. Then walk across the platform and get on the Monorail to the terminal. Simple, easy, fast, and much cheaper.
What's this? Useful information on T1B?
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:02 pm
by KC Scott
Left Seater wrote:KC Scott,
If you return to NYC. Go to Penn Station. Take any New Jersey Transit train on either the Northeast Corridor Line or the North Jersey Coast Line. Both stop at Newark Airport. Then walk across the platform and get on the Monorail to the terminal. Simple, easy, fast, and much cheaper.
Thanks
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:04 pm
by War Wagon
Tom In VA wrote:
A comment on a news website I read pertaining to this makes the claim it isn't the bird itself as much as it's - according to the poster there - the "metal ring around it's neck for tracking" that screws things up.
The contention seems to be the bird flesh alone wouldn't cause a jet engine to sieze up as it would simply get liquified - like hitting puree on a blender - but objects affixed to a bird that cause it.
Bullshit.
How many birds do you think get collared, as a percentage?
Maybe
one bird alone wouldn't bring down a plane, but birds of a feather flock together. It could have been a half dozen, or more.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:08 pm
by War Wagon
That doesn't prove shit, as they were going in the direction of the current. Maybe steering, but certainly not towing... and holding on for dear life.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:12 pm
by War Wagon
Let's see them try to tow it upriver then, dumbfuck.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:19 pm
by Bobby42

'nuff said.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:25 pm
by Sirfindafold
The T1B is an amazing thing, it can turn an Airbus Crash into a Cripple Fight.
sin,

Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:32 pm
by smackaholic
wags, those tugs are made to tow shit wayyyyyyyy bigger than a little airplane. they push around 80,000 ton ships. i think they might handle a little tinfoil airliner.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:03 am
by Louis Cyphre
Mace wrote:smackaholic wrote:wags, those tugs are made to tow shit wayyyyyyyy bigger than a little airplane. they push around 80,000 ton ships. i think they might handle a little tinfoil airliner.
I bet one of 'em couldn't tow that fat lady to the zoo for her MRI....just sayin'.
True, but are they
equipped to tow those things/people?
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:09 am
by Diego in Seattle
That was an A320.
Imagine the fun if that would have been an
A380.

Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:20 am
by Left Seater
Tom In VA wrote:Left Seater,
A comment on a news website I read pertaining to this makes the claim it isn't the bird itself as much as it's - according to the poster there - the "metal ring around it's neck for tracking" that screws things up.
The contention seems to be the bird flesh alone wouldn't cause a jet engine to sieze up as it would simply get liquified - like hitting puree on a blender - but objects affixed to a bird that cause it.
Any thoughts ?
Yeah, lots of thoughts. Can a flock of large birds without tracking devices chew up an engine? Hell, yes. It is also possible that the engine doesn't lose blades, but instead stalls or flames out. At such a low altitude it would be impossible to restart before hitting the ground.
Engines can take handle a small bird or even some larger ones, but we are going to get it checked ASAP. I have had two bird strikes in my career, none in the engine though. Both times on the leading edge of the wing and we returned immediately to have it checked out.
Bird strikes are bad and that is why airports spend so much money to make sure it doesn't happen.
I say that news report is crap.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:23 am
by RadioFan
Miracle everyone survived.
RACK the NYPD, the harbor patrol and everyone involved in the rescue effort.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:29 am
by War Wagon
smackaholic wrote:wags, those tugs are made to tow shit wayyyyyyyy bigger than a little airplane. they push around 80,000 ton ships. i think they might handle a little tinfoil airliner.
I wasn't referring to tugboats, and those weren't tugboats on the scene to begin with.
I was talking about the immediate responders. Those ferrys and police cruisers couldn't tow a rowboat upstream, and they didn't.
They simply steered that aircraft to the nearest likely landing spot.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:44 am
by Left Seater
Not to get in the way of this tug and towing discussion, but I guess I will.
While an A320 weighs way less than loaded barges, the barges are built to be towed/pushed thru water. The A320 would likely be ripped apart by a tow line if it was attempted to be towed upriver. Or crushed by a tug trying to push it upriver. Planes are pretty damn fragile, outside of normal operating situations.
Based on my understanding of FAR 121.391 every seat on this plane must have been occupied. The reports say all 155 people on the plane were rescued safely. Five of these were crew, 2 pilots, three cabin. The FAR says you must have 1 flight attendant for each 50 seats or any part thereof. So if this plane had 151 seats they would have needed 4 flight attendants.
So either every seat was full, or they were a FA short.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:05 am
by Tom In VA
Thanks Left Seater, just wondering. To clarify, it wasn't the NEWS article itself, just a comment made by a visitor in a comment thread under the article.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:26 am
by War Wagon
Left Seater wrote:Not to get in the way of this tug and towing discussion, but I guess I will.
Perish the thought. We like arguing about the inconsequential.
While an A320 weighs way less than loaded barges...
How much does an A320 weigh when it's half or more full of water?
And how much HP would it take to tow that sumbitch upstream?
Just a hypothetical question, because this is a stupid arguement that mv loves to get himself in.
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 3:42 am
by War Wagon
Shut up.
These boats you speak of weren't the ones guiding it to it's final resting place.
Clear enough?
Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:13 am
by Cueball
Bobby42 wrote:
Not geese but it was a big mofu goose. Serious violation of U.S. airspace.
There is only 1 goose big enough to take down a plane. Rich Gannon out front should told ya.

Re: Airbus A320 crashes in Hudson River
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:14 am
by Diego in Seattle
Perhaps the frog really were testing their engines with frozen turkeys.