shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:55 am

This is some sick shit.... along with his Midwestern buddy.

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... =5&t=31059

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:28 am

Papa Willie wrote:
Blueblood wrote:This is some sick shit.... along with his Midwestern buddy.

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... =5&t=31059
So how many times have you jacked off to it, fag?

You're the only one outside of "the jon" to approve of child porn.

Congrats.

Fat "white guy" from the south... and child porn ?

No way.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:35 am

Papa Willie wrote:
Where did I approve of it?

Blueblood wrote:You condoned it... you pedophile.

It's there for everyone to see.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:43 am

the pedophile wrote:

Quit grasping at straws, cunt-head. This is so 2002.

Dan Vogel · Post by **Dan Vogel** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:56 am

Just seeing this topic is over the top disgusting. Get this garbage out of here. I wouldn't click that link if I was given a million dollars.

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:08 am

R-Jack wrote:I'm not exactly ready to give a big Bravo to TheJonzos either. I wouldn't be shocked if that pic came from his camera and not his computer. The only shocking thing is that he didn't photoshop George Brett's face into the pitching position.

Yahoo Images, numbnuts

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:09 am

R-Jack wrote:Yeah, staring down a picture of two men having sex long enough to make a guess on their age....................no that's not any type of raging faggotry at all.

Lefty took the pic down but I couldn't tell you the ages. In all seriousness, hopefully they were 18 or Yahoo! has got some 'splainin' to do.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:24 am

R-Jack wrote:Yeah, staring down a picture of two men having sex long enough to make a guess on their age....................no that's not any type of raging faggotry at all.

You kinda just kicked your own ass... dipshit.

unreal.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:29 am

Papa Willie wrote:
R-Jack wrote:Yeah, staring down a picture of two men having sex long enough to make a guess on their age....................no that's not any type of raging faggotry at all.

That's pretty much where I am on it.

You get a pass.... you're not too bright, and you're from the south.

.m2 · Post by **.m2** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:56 am

Papa Willie wrote:

No. You tried to make a big deal out of this, yet everybody is shitting down your little throat and nobody has ANY respect for you at all. Learn your place in here, cunt. You are the janitor. You are of no importance at all.

Onward, faggot....

Since you're not bright enough to check the moray....

.... your name will be "Chester" from here on out.

the truth

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:43 pm

R-Jack wrote:Please explain how the guy who wasn't studying gay porn is the guy who KYOA.

I hope you're not holding out for a well thought out, rational, cogent explanation that clears up your question quite nicely.

.
.
.

Expect random pictures of mountains and/or C- chicks with uneven boobs, crooked teeth, and unkempt bajingos.

T1B

shutyomouth and Child Porn....

shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....

Re: shutyomouth and Child Porn....