Rate your team's draft
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:06 am
2004 draft ... 5 years later.
For Oakland, this was the "Robert Gallery" draft.
In the days after the draft, the Raiders were given high marks for their effort.
Gallery was a can't miss choice at #2 overall.
On top of that they sought to beef up the line further by taking Jake Grove in the 2nd round.
Grove was another highly touted player as a center out of VT.
But he ended up being a very mediocre-at-best player for Oakland for 5 years before recently departing for Miami.
Schweigert in the 3rd was regarded as a solid pick.
Not so, however.
"Al showed good sense by beefing up the team where it needs it," was the general consensus among "experts" after this draft was over.
Oh well.
2004 Oakland Raider Draft
1 2(2) Robert Gallery OT IOWA
2 13(45) from Tampa Bay Jake Grove C VIRGINIA TECH
3 4(67) Stuart Schweigert DB PURDUE
4 3(99) Carlos Francis WR TEXAS TECH
5 2(134) Johnnie Morant WR SYRACUSE
6 1(166) Shawn Johnson DE DELAWARE
6 17(182) from New Orleans through Dallas Cody Spencer LB NORTH TEXAS
7 44(245) Compensatory Courtney Anderson TE SAN JOSE STATE
7 54(255) Compensatory Andre Sommersell LB COLORADO
Gallery flamed at LT, but he's settled in as a real good LG.
Grove was just fair.
Schweigert was sub-par and was one of Raider fan's favorite whipping boys because of his very "soft" play at safety.
The rest is pretty much total slop.
5 years later, I give this draft a D, and that may be generous.
Drafts like this are why Oakland has been a bottom-feeder for the past 5 seasons.
How'd your team fare?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfldraft/draft04/tracker/team
http://walterfootball.com/draft2004G.php
The second link is pretty interesting because it shows grades and comments from immediately after the 2004 draft, and then grades and comments from four years later.
For Oakland, this was the "Robert Gallery" draft.
In the days after the draft, the Raiders were given high marks for their effort.
Gallery was a can't miss choice at #2 overall.
On top of that they sought to beef up the line further by taking Jake Grove in the 2nd round.
Grove was another highly touted player as a center out of VT.
But he ended up being a very mediocre-at-best player for Oakland for 5 years before recently departing for Miami.
Schweigert in the 3rd was regarded as a solid pick.
Not so, however.
"Al showed good sense by beefing up the team where it needs it," was the general consensus among "experts" after this draft was over.
Oh well.
2004 Oakland Raider Draft
1 2(2) Robert Gallery OT IOWA
2 13(45) from Tampa Bay Jake Grove C VIRGINIA TECH
3 4(67) Stuart Schweigert DB PURDUE
4 3(99) Carlos Francis WR TEXAS TECH
5 2(134) Johnnie Morant WR SYRACUSE
6 1(166) Shawn Johnson DE DELAWARE
6 17(182) from New Orleans through Dallas Cody Spencer LB NORTH TEXAS
7 44(245) Compensatory Courtney Anderson TE SAN JOSE STATE
7 54(255) Compensatory Andre Sommersell LB COLORADO
Gallery flamed at LT, but he's settled in as a real good LG.
Grove was just fair.
Schweigert was sub-par and was one of Raider fan's favorite whipping boys because of his very "soft" play at safety.
The rest is pretty much total slop.
5 years later, I give this draft a D, and that may be generous.
Drafts like this are why Oakland has been a bottom-feeder for the past 5 seasons.
How'd your team fare?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfldraft/draft04/tracker/team
http://walterfootball.com/draft2004G.php
The second link is pretty interesting because it shows grades and comments from immediately after the 2004 draft, and then grades and comments from four years later.