T1B

88 wrote: Why do pretty women hang out with losers like that?

women like to CHANGE men. i'm sure the whole time her girlfriends told her what a peice of shit he was...i guarantee she told them more than once "he'll change for me" or something of the sort.


when me and the wife get into arguments or little fights, one of the last things she says before she shuts up is "you havent changed since the day we met". well no shit?

88 wrote: What a piece of shit. Why do pretty women hang out with losers like that?

They fuck the shit outta them.


Is this a trick question ?

Blueblood wrote:

88 wrote: What a piece of shit. Why do pretty women hang out with losers like that?

They fuck the shit outta them.


Is this a trick question ?

RACK M2. I need to get on the gravy train like that dude. Why are you faulting him, 88? 99% of the time it's some whores soaking that guy for cash, all in the name of love.

If I'm the magistrate, I rule in favor of the loser guy and say RACK HIM FOR GETTING OVER.

88 wrote: Holy shit, they could broadcast this shit and knock American Idol off the tube.

That's never been tried.

How clueless are you?

Kee-rist why in the fuck are you up in the middle of night posting this shit. I just got laid and can't sleep and am getting drunker and might go terrorize the OL into round two with Tiny the Terrible-what the fuck is your excuse?

He just stood there like the stupid fuck he was.

I pictured Guntslinger.



Btw, men marry women hoping they'll never change, but they do.
Women marry men wanting them to change, but they never do.

when me and the wife get into arguments or little fights, one of the last things she says before she shuts up is "you havent changed since the day we met". well no shit?

Now that's the funniest truth I've seen in a while !! I'm still chuckling.

Oh-- and 88--- wasn't that the premise for Judge Wapner's show ? It was like Jerry Springer meets the judge.

Wolfman wrote:Oh-- and 88--- wasn't that the premise for Judge Wapner's show ? It was like Jerry Springer meets the judge.

Uhhh, yeah, but if you think it begins and ends with Wapner, as TVO alluded, you're clueless.

One of the funniest moments in my life of a professional nature was the time I saw one of my former clients on Judge Mathis.

I am volunteering to be a mentor to a newly admitted attorney this year

What a great and noble cause.

I am sure that the douche bag attorney will be grateful to you for showing him how the other scum buckets of life, and their lowlife clients do business. After all, if he is not smart enough to figure out that basic shit, then he deserves the dry fucking. Fuckin criminals,cops,judges and their associated hangers on have their own little economy going on.

Try volunteering your time to something worthwhile that produces results for the effort, instead of dealing with the assholes of society and their clients. But then you know all the inside courtroom jokes ..

http://honorflight.org

http://communityofveterans.org

http://angelflight.com

^^^^ Fuck you and the horse you rode in on, you illiterate, cock-smoking piece of shit.

Screwed by every fag in Michigan wrote:^^^^ Fuck you and the horse you rode in on, you illiterate, cock-smoking piece of shit.

ALEX: Oh...I am sorry ...Tardling known as Screwed by every fag in Michigan...the judges have ruled that your lame ass blast at smack lacked the the obligatory black cock reference that your little group of felchers has to include in every post, in order to try and convince everyone you have game.

We are deducting the entire amount of your winnings, which was none, and donating it to your local Gay Pride group in your name, AND you lose choice of the next category. If you would please put a tampon in your bleeding cunt, and stop fouling the stage so we can get on with the game, it would be appreciated.

Barely any more literate than the usually nonsensical and unreadable tripe you post. Props to you, I guess.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Barely any more literate than the usually nonsensical and unreadable tripe you post. Props to you, I guess.

^^^^ Fuck you and the horse you rode in on, you illiterate, cock-smoking piece of shit.

Yeah...he gets it....

Screw_Michigan wrote:Barely any more literate than the usually nonsensical and unreadable tripe you post. Props to you, I guess.

No ....props to you for rolling over and submitting you fuckin tardling queer..a man has to know his limitations..

88 wrote:Wapner's cases were hand-picked because they involved unusual facts, plus the people knew they were on TV.

One of the things about today's "court" shows like People's Court, Judge Judy, etc. is that everyone who appears on the show receives a $5,000 appearance fee. Now, if you lose on the show, the judgment against you is deducted from that fee. But since they won't award a judgment in excess of $5,000, in a worst-case scenario, you're breaking even on those shows, as long as you don't mind being embarrassed a little.

dingus wrote:Kee-rist why in the fuck are you up in the middle of night posting this shit. I just got laid and can't sleep and am getting drunker and might go terrorize the OL into round two with Tiny the Terrible-what the fuck is your excuse?

So it's ok for your shit troll to post at midnight but not me? Gotcha.

Terry in Crapchester wrote: ...is that everyone who appears on the show receives a $5,000 appearance fee.

Really? I thought it was way lower than that. You know anyone who's been on one of them?

I don't know if this has been posted before, but shouldn't 99 percent of lawyers be shot?

I would give exemptions to 88, Jsc810 and Vincent Bugloisi.

Stan Fukkken Pickle wrote:I don't know if this has been posted before, but shouldn't 99 percent of lawyers be shot?

I would give exemptions to 88, Jsc810 and Vincent Bugloisi.

Why ? So they can reproduce and breed more scum bag lawyer offspring ?

If you do 100% of them, then you eliminate the problem and it will be at least half a generation before our courts and business become completely clogged again from the vermin.

If you leave 1% of the cancer, you still have cancer.

Moving Sale wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote: ...is that everyone who appears on the show receives a $5,000 appearance fee.

Really? I thought it was way lower than that. You know anyone who's been on one of them?

As I said above, one of my former clients showed up on Judge Mathis, but I didn't get that number from him. IIRC, it came from one of those supermarket tabloid rags my wife brings home on occasion. Not the most reliable source, of course. But then again, on this point at least, who would know better than them?

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Blah blah blah, my wife is a silverback gorilla and my kids are half apes...

You should be the first lawyer killed....Die, mother fukkker, DIE!

Terry in Crapchester wrote: Not the most reliable source, of course. But then again, on this point at least, who would know better than them?

Probably good enough for you to bring a weak lawsuit against though, and good enough to base your take here on. :doh: :doh: :doh: