Page 1 of 1
Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:14 pm
by Stan Fukkken Pickle
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crim ... ape_a.html
Monster gets 422 years for 19-hour rape and torture of Columbia student
Calling the sex-torture of a Columbia student an "extraordinary evil," an angry judge Thursday sent the sadistic rapist to jail for 422 years - and said he deserved more.
During the trial, the 23-year-old victim testified that she feared she would not survive the nightmarish April 13, 2007, assault in her Hamilton Heights studio apartment.
She described how Williams followed her from the elevator to her apartment door, forcing his way inside and repeatedly raping her.
"I thought after he took all my stuff, I thought he would leave," she testified. "When he started raping me again, I was sure I was going to die."
Over 19 hours, Williams tortured the victim as she pleaded for her life. He blinded her with bleach, scalded her with boiling water, sealed her lips with crazy glue, made her cut off her hair - and demanded she gouge out her eyes before slicing her eyelids.
He capped his fiendish crime by setting her ablaze while she lay bound to a futon frame.
Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:05 am
by Stan Fukkken Pickle
mvscal wrote:I'm going to wait until I hear from his grandmother until I form an opinion. I'm sure he's good kid who was just trying to get his life together after falling in with the wrong crowd.
I've actually read of about 100 crimes committed by blacks where they try to blind the victim with bleech. It's almost as if somebody in the black community wrote a Standard Operational Procedure on crime and handed it out to every negro in every negro neighborhood.
I suppose if the victim is unable to identify the prepetrator in a courtroom they have a better chance to escape justice.
Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:44 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
If his people were given their due reparations, he could have been out on the town, spending his "reparation" cheque instead of being set-up by the cracker racist establishment.
I blame whitey. Kill whitey.
Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:43 am
by War Wagon
Marty, you forgot to sign that

Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:02 pm
by Screw_Michigan
mvscal wrote:I'm going to wait until I hear from his grandmother until I form an opinion. I'm sure he's good kid who was just trying to get his life together after falling in with the wrong crowd.
There must be some mistake.
Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:23 pm
by indyfrisco
Just thought this comment on that page was humorous.
johangotrib Aug 5, 2008 9:35:35 AM Report Offensive Post
This case makes me wish he was in Mississippi in 1930, this would be settled already and he would be a windchime in a tree.
Never heard of a hanging described as "a windchime in a tree". That phrase definitely needs to be included in the T1B lexicon for obvious reasons.
Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:40 pm
by Stan Fukkken Pickle
IndyFrisco wrote:Just thought this comment on that page was humorous.
johangotrib Aug 5, 2008 9:35:35 AM Report Offensive Post
This case makes me wish he was in Mississippi in 1930, this would be settled already and he would be a windchime in a tree.
Never heard of a hanging described as "a windchime in a tree". That phrase definitely needs to be included in the T1B lexicon for obvious reasons.
Nothing humourous about that post at all. In fact, it couldn't be more appropriate. I pray to God we can get back to the day when these subhuman beasts are dragged out of their jail cell by an angry mob and dangled from the nearest lightpost until they are breathless!
Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:18 pm
by indyfrisco
Stan Fukkken Pickle wrote:IndyFrisco wrote:Just thought this comment on that page was humorous.
johangotrib Aug 5, 2008 9:35:35 AM Report Offensive Post
This case makes me wish he was in Mississippi in 1930, this would be settled already and he would be a windchime in a tree.
Never heard of a hanging described as "a windchime in a tree". That phrase definitely needs to be included in the T1B lexicon for obvious reasons.
Nothing humourous about that post at all. In fact, it couldn't be more appropriate. I pray to God we can get back to the day when these subhuman beasts are dragged out of their jail cell by an angry mob and dangled from the nearest lightpost until they are breathless!
I prefer eye for an eye. This douchebag should be raped for 19 hours with a splintery plunger with bleach poured in his eyes after cutting off his eyelids and super glueing his mouth shut just before you set him ablaze. After that, he goes to jail and we just hope he gets shanked soon.
And I'm not against the death penalty for rape either. In this guy's case, I would vote thumbs up on the death penalty, but not until after the eye for an eye experience.
Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:30 pm
by Van
Bwaaaaa!
Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:32 pm
by Stan Fukkken Pickle
mvscal wrote:
Rapists should be forced to eat their own cock and balls before being killed with a lit stick of dynamite shoved up their asses.
MVSCAL FOR PRESIDENT!!!!
Re: Was 422 years appropriate punishment???
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:21 pm
by Stan Fukkken Pickle
Setting people on fire and splashing acid in their eyes is the latest trend. All the nogs are doing it now...even the nog purse snatchers are throwing acid in their victims eyes.
I'm telling you...some nog is passing out an SOP on crime.