T1B

What a petty miserable cunt, uhhhh, I mean Senator Cunt.

He was following normal protocol. Senator or Ma'am is absolutely proper. Infact, ma'am actually is normal as it is shorter and less clumsy sounding.

BTW, I would come to the exact same conclusion if that stupid cunt was a republican. This has nothing to do with politics. It is about being a decent civil human being. If that stupid cunt felt she was being slighted, she could have waited til a break and said, general, how 'bout calling me senator?

Just interested in hearing the libs defend this one. I'd like to particularly hear from vet libs like terry. You know goddamn well he was following normal protocol.

This fukking miserable cunt was just doing what miserable lib cunts do, showing disdain for the military.

I think she just might regret this pompous bullshit come election time. Or is Cali so solidly antimilitary libtard that it won't matter.

She worked hard to get that title and now it doesn't mean shit!!! What a fucking Bitch!!!! She should be ashamed of herself for speaking that way to a member of our Armed Forces who fights to give her the privilege to run for senator....SHAME ON YOU CUNT!!!!!

At least he didn't call her Mr. Tibbs.

Senator or ma'am are both correct. She prefers senator. He obliged. Non-issue.

Mountain out of molehills, smeltoholic. Unbunch your panties and move on.

+1 in the cunt category.

maybe she was riding the cotton pony.

Sirfindafold wrote:maybe she was riding the cotton pony.

http://boxer.senate.gov/about/bio/

Doesn't state her age but does state that she's been married since 1962 and is a grandmother. I'll go out on a limb just a tad and say that's highly unlikely.

smackaholic wrote:I'd like to particularly hear from vet libs like terry.

What do I think about this? I think that I probably never would've heard about it at all, but for the fact that somebody on this board was waiting with baited breath for something like this to happen.

Oh, and socal has it right.

^^^psycho much?

Was it that important to verify sff's suggestion?

Psycho much, because I looked up her official biography? :?

Terry in Crapchester wrote:Psycho much, because I looked up her official biography? :?

I read sff's comment, chuckled, and then moved on. I wasn't motivated to search for her online bio to determine whether it's possible she could be on the rag or not. Maybe I was a little overdramatic by characterizing that as "psycho"...but certainly seemed weird.

Just sayin'. No need to get cunty about it.

JMak wrote:Maybe I was a little overdramatic by characterizing that as "psycho"...but certainly seemed weird.

Not at all. Terry will go to the far depths of the Earth to pardon any liberal of wrongdoings.

He should have thrown his shoes at her...I doubt she has the moves that TheBrushClearer in Chief showed.

Is she from the bay area? She might be a brush clearer herself.

You just made me spit up the dried herring I was gnawing on.

Terry in Crapchester wrote: What do I think about this? I think that I probably never would've heard about it at all, but for the fact that somebody on this board was waiting with baited breath for something like this to happen.

Oh, and socal has it right.

Figures that would be your response.

You don't think she looks the least bit petty telling the general to call her senator when ma'am is a normal accepted alternative?

This was nothing more than an insecure petty bitch reminding somebody who was in charge there. If you can't see that, you're as a dumb a cunt as she.

PSUFAN wrote:You just made me spit up the dried herring I was gnawing on.

That's what you get for eating dried herring. :throw-up smiley: x infinity

After reviewing the play, a double technical is assessed. Boxer was cunty for objecting to being called "ma'am," and suxawholedik was cunty for posting a thread about it.

There - everybody happy?

He shoulda called her "sugar tits."

The only people who will ever give a shit about this are the same folks who never would have voted for Boxer in the first place.

BSmack wrote:The only people who will ever give a shit about this are the same folks who never would have voted for Boxer in the first place.

So in your mind, what does that say about the people who voted for her?

All women are cunts and whores.

The only people who will ever give a shit about this are the same folks who never would have voted for Boxer in the first place.
So sadly true. The folks who vote for her are brain dead.

Sirfindafold wrote:

BSmack wrote:The only people who will ever give a shit about this are the same folks who never would have voted for Boxer in the first place.

So in your mind, what does that say about the people who voted for her?

It says they agree with her policies more often than not. I know damn well each party has its share of pretentious blowhards.

Smackaholic, Boxer keeps getting re-elected not because she's a Dem, but because the CA GOP leadetship inexplicably makes their candidate a mega-rich, assault rifle-loving, self-righteous bible thumper. If they'd get a reasonably moderate Republican on the ballot, they'd destroy Boxer in November, red state or not.

The Dems can't stand her either, as she's a know-nothing blowhard with a brutal insecurity streak. But they don't pit her against a worthy primary opponent because she's got seniority and she beats the GOP's Charlton Heston-Pat Bichanon hybrid every fukken time.

No one here will say jack shit about it, as we're all pretty well used to Boxer embarrassing the shit out of us on a regular basis.

like I said--brain dead ! Thanks for verifying it.

Screw_Michigan wrote:
RACK Bennish!

Who 'dat?

BSmack wrote:

Sirfindafold wrote:

BSmack wrote:The only people who will ever give a shit about this are the same folks who never would have voted for Boxer in the first place.

So in your mind, what does that say about the people who voted for her?

It says they agree with her policies more often than not. I know damn well each party has its share of pretentious blowhards.

BWA!

Here's Boxer's policies:

Do whatever is necessary to appear more important than Diane Feinstein. /end of list

Can you think of anything she's done in more than a decade in the senate? Me neither. She's the insecure wife of some rich dude who felt like a Maury-watching loser. So she pretty much ran for office to give herself a sense of worth. Problem is, she's overshadowed by Feinstein, who is respected by the vast majority of californians. Sure, she's got plenty of lib-loony ideas, but she conducts herself in a way that she thinks best represents the state's and her constituents views.

mvscal calls me a braindead douchebag and insists that everyone hates DF in 3...2...

"What's my name!
SAY MY NAME BITCH!!"








"Uh...
SENATOR BOXER!!
SENATOR BOXER!!
OH GOD!"

PSUFAN wrote:He should have thrown his shoes at her...I doubt she has the moves that TheBrushClearer in Chief showed.

I doubt a general in full uniform is wearing sandals, though I wouldn't have minded had he smacked her upside the head with a boot.

OCmike wrote:BWA!

Here's Boxer's policies:

Do whatever is necessary to appear more important than Diane Feinstein. /end of list

Can you think of anything she's done in more than a decade in the senate?

I don't vote for her seat. You do. If I were a Californian, perhaps I would be more familiar with her record.

Her hair and glasses are worse than Sarah Palins.

trev wrote:Her hair and glasses are worse than Sarah Palins.

Perhaps she should seek a RNC wardrobe makeover.

I'd suckle on Palin's man in the canoe until she yelped like a puppy. The thought of that activity with Boxer is what prompted the dried herring comment...

OCmike wrote:Smackaholic, Boxer keeps getting re-elected not because she's a Dem, but because the CA GOP leadetship inexplicably makes their candidate a mega-rich, assault rifle-loving, self-righteous bible thumper.

Matt Fong? Bill Jones?

The only time she faced an actual conservative was in '92, and she needed a last second smear campaign to get over on Herschenson. Fong was supposed to be the 'electable' moderate candidate (beating out Issa in the primary) and Jones was such a dud he never ran a single TV ad.




And leadetship isn't a word. I don't care, but apparently that's important around here.

PSUFAN wrote:I'd suckle on Palin's man in the canoe until she yelped like a puppy. The thought of that activity with Boxer is what prompted the dried herring comment...

I'll have to rack that.

mvscal wrote:

Van wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:
RACK Bennish!

Who 'dat?

I believe that is Meltio Fan.

Now how would you know who that is? He claims he has never posted his picture on the boards.

trev wrote:

PSUFAN wrote:I'd suckle on Palin's man in the canoe until she yelped like a puppy. The thought of that activity with Boxer is what prompted the dried herring comment...

I'll have to rack that.

See that, mvscal? BODE, mofo.

Hold up there, PSU. You're playing an entirely different game than the one mvscal runs on trev.

You just wanna chew on Palin's (and, clearly, trev's) clit until you achieve proper MILF squirtage. Nothing wrong with that, not at all. Quite commendable, all in all.

mvscal and trev, that's an altogether different animal. When mvscal darkens trev's back door he shoots for exquisite pain and Stockholm Syndrome style subjugation/humiliation, in his sweet, sweet ministrations.

His only contact with trev's little Charger in the canoe involves copper wiring, highly tensioned alligator clips, a bathtub filled with Mountain Dew, packs of D cells duct taped together and an oft ignored "safe word."

Respect.

he should have called her bitch