Page 1 of 1

Schmick should be happy

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:45 am
by Terry in Crapchester
The NCAA no longer requires one team to wear white jerseys in a game. Now, the only requirement is that the teams wear contrasting colors.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_ ... ing-r.html

I do have to admit that I kinda liked the old school tradition of both USC and UCLA wearing their home jerseys for that game. Now they can go back to that.

I should also point out that ND, for a major part of its history, wore blue at home and green on the road. I don't see it happening, but it might be nice to see us go back to that.

Re: Schmick should be happy

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:55 pm
by MuchoBulls
That is a good rule.

Re: Schmick should be happy

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:28 pm
by King Crimson
i wonder if there will be any noise about OU and UT both wearing home colors as a result of this. since the "home team" is allowed to bring more recruits and the home-away factor (despite the neutral site) figures in the conference scheduling....i guess there's some existing rationale to keeping one team in road whites...which would be my preference anyway.

Re: Schmick should be happy

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:41 pm
by SoCalTrjn
the USC v. UCLA game is still played at eachothers home stadiums, not a neutral site, and all the other home/away rules apply.

They should penalize UCLA 15 yards for wearing their blue jerseys at the Coliseum next year just on priciple though.

Re: Schmick should be happy

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:42 pm
by The Seer
SoCalTrjn wrote: priciple

love those trojies

Re: Schmick should be happy

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:04 am
by SoCalTrjn
damn, missed the n. The 'ruins can suck cock all over the field because punting and well typo smack, is winning

Re: Schmick should be happy

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:43 am
by The Seer
SoCalTrjn wrote:damn, missed the n. The condoms can suck cock all over the field because paying recruits and their families, is winning