T1B

http://www.wsfa.com/Global/story.asp?S=10793103

WTF, Sam? You guys would undoubtedly guzzle Piss Minus out of a bottle shaped like Nick Saban's dong, yet this turns you off? Christ, mang.

They probably wanted Nick Saban on there instead of the chick.

Alabama liquor regulations prohibit labels that are offensive or immodest.
States are free to establish their own laws pertaining to alcohol. Tough shit if you don't like it.

Yeah, it's real "tough shit" I can't buy a bottle of wine I have no interest in, from a state I don't reside in. You sure showed me, wolftard.

States are free to establish their own laws pertaining to alcohol.

Who said they weren't? :?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Yeah, it's real "tough shit" I can't buy a bottle of wine I have no interest in, from a state I don't reside in. You sure showed me, wolftard.

States are free to establish their own laws pertaining to alcohol.

Who said they weren't? :?

No doubt Obama will.

A naked white woman on a bottle of liquor?

I be guessing dey be afraid that dem dare minorities would start raping doughs prety little white woman for too long.

Wolfman wrote:Alabama liquor regulations prohibit labels that are offensive or immodest.
States are free to establish their own laws pertaining to alcohol. Tough shit if you don't like it.

Wolfie busted off a pro-Big Government take? Bwahahaha

You should dunk the makers of that wine under water.

If they float, they are obviously witches. Kill them. If they drown, God will carry their souls to Heaven.

That's the state of things in America right now, isn't it? Poking about the innards of dead crows to divine prophecy and such?

PSUFAN wrote:

Wolfman wrote:Alabama liquor regulations prohibit labels that are offensive or immodest.
States are free to establish their own laws pertaining to alcohol. Tough shit if you don't like it.

Wolfie busted off a pro-Big Government take? Bwahahaha

Did you just make me defend One Foot In It?

Fuck the fuck out of you, you fucking idiot.

Wanna explain how a states'-righter is "pro-Big Government"?


Did you really just type that?

Give yourself 40 lashes for dumbfuckery.

Like clockwork...

so a State can play Nanny, and it's all good? I anticipated this retort from Wolfie, not from...well...

PSUFAN wrote:Like clockwork...

so a State can play Nanny, and it's all good? I anticipated this retort from Wolfie, not from...well...

The Fucking Constitution fucking SAYS that's a state issue...

dumbass.


In the Conservative Realm, state governments are only "Big Government" when they overstep their state's constitution.

Maybe some here need to check out the 21st Amendment.
Talking about a "teachable moment" ???

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-fir ... nstitution

Wolfman wrote:Maybe some here need to check out the 21st Amendment.

Why?

Wolfman wrote:Maybe some here need to check out the 21st Amendment.
Talking about a "teachable moment" ???

I didn't figure that defending you would last long.


The number you were looking for was "ten."


The Tenth Amendment. Every fucking American should read it and actually understand what it says.


Just because Lincoln thought it was bunk, it doesn't mean we all should.

Dinsdale wrote: The number you were looking for was "ten."

Close. Not bad for an amateur though.

Dinsdale wrote:The Tenth Amendment. Every fucking American should read it and actually understand what it says.


Just because Lincoln thought it was bunk, it doesn't mean we all should.

What are these states' rights you speak of?

Sin,

Sorry - but a state prohibiting an illustration of a breast on a fucking wine bottle defines Big Government.

PSUFAN wrote:Sorry - but a state prohibiting an illustration of a breast on a fucking wine bottle defines Big Government.

We still have dry counties in Alabama that dont allow alcohol. So anything involving alcohol is cluster fucked.

Remember this...

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MZoTJzh13n8&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MZoTJzh13n8&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

Wolfman wrote:Maybe some here need to check out the 21st Amendment.
Talking about a "teachable moment" ???

Moving Sale wrote:Why?

Dinsdale wrote:I didn't figure that defending you would last long.


The number you were looking for was "ten."


The Tenth Amendment. Every fucking American should read it and actually understand what it says.


Just because Lincoln thought it was bunk, it doesn't mean we all should.

Far be it from me to make a habit out of defending the old coot. But in this particular case, he was right.

Mr T wrote: We still have dry counties in Alabama that dont allow alcohol.

what the fuck do you expect from protestants?

Terry in Crapchester wrote: But in this particular case, he was right.

Good gawd. They are not regulating alcohol. They are regulating the label on the container. This is clearly outside of the 21st Am.


"The aim of the Twenty-first Amendment was to allow States to maintain an effective and uniform system for controlling liquor* by regulating its transportation, importation, and use." Granholm v. Heald (2005)

Not it's fucking label. :doh:

Not it's fucking label.

smackaholic, your thoughts?

:)