T1B

http://www.mizozo.com/world/08/2009/10/ ... -s....html

It looks like she is slightly sensitive to being the other less successful Clinton. Either that or she just got confirmation Slick Willy convinced those two reporters he "rescued" from NK to double suck his dick on the long flight home to the States.

"DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?"




Obviously doesn't care.

Prolly thought you were Jabba.

Good for her. I'm going to rack her for that one.

trev wrote:Good for her. I'm going to rack her for that one.

Yea, that was weird. Anybody up for bringing the Congolese into the 21st century? Who the fuck was that? Archie Bunker?

That bitter cunt needs to be aware that were it not for bill, she's some unknown miserable bitch lawyer somewhere.

mvscal wrote:

smackaholic wrote:That bitter cunt needs to be aware that were it not for bill, she's some unknown miserable bitch lawyer somewhere.

She is well aware of the fact. Why do you think she's such a bitter cunt?

The nog was correct. Nobody gives the slightest bit of fuck about anything she does or says. This was a very odd case of career suicide.

Why did you throw the military under the bus to protect a rapist?

Rooster wrote:rips into a student

Good gawd you are a tard.

Moving Sale wrote:Why did you throw the military under the bus to protect a rapist?

Ya know... if you'd just put that in your signature file, you'd have about 50% more time to spam the board.


Sayin'.

I don't know. It actually was a reasonable response.

Tom In VA wrote:I don't know. It actually was a reasonable response.

It was a resonable response for a normal person on the street.

She's allegedly the S of S. She ought to show a bit of dignity, especially to some foreign student who was just trying to ask a question.

You can damn well bet her old man would have handled it differently, but, then again he has more charisma in his left pinky toenail than that dried up bitter old hag has in her entire wretched body.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Ya know... if you'd just put that in your signature file, you'd have about 50% more time to spam the board.

You had at least two responses that you could have puked up. ^^This... or something along the lines of "yea mvskkal why did you throw the military under the bus when you profess to be so pro-military?"

Of course you are a stupid right wing fuckhole so of course you have mvskkkal's dick up your ass.

Carry on Chuck.

smackaholic wrote: She ought to show a bit of dignity, especially to some foreign student who was just trying to ask a question.

And what a direct and probative question it was. :?

Moving Sale wrote:You had at least two responses that you could have puked up. ^^This... or something along the lines of "yea mvskkal why did you throw the military under the bus when you profess to be so pro-military?"

There's generally two specific groups of people that would pose the same damned question to someone about 500 times... a retard or a child. Which are you?

Do you really think you've accomplishing anything beyond making an ass of yourself with this... strategy? Melt on, cunt.

Now wait a minute ucan't. I think you're being a bit harsh.

I'm getting close to throwing common sense under the bus to protect a jurist.

First off, why are you fucking with me and letting your ass buddy mvskkkal off the hook when he threw the military under the bus to protect a rapist? Now let's get to your post...

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:There's generally two specific groups of people that would pose the same damned question to someone about 500 times... a retard or a child. Which are you?

A) False dichotomy much you pompous fuckhole?
B) I have only asked him a dozen times or so, exaggeration much?
Two fallacies in one sentence. Good show.

Do you really think you've accomplishing anything beyond making an ass of yourself with this... strategy?

Again why are you posting to me and not mvskkkal? Why don't you care about him throwing the military under the bus? Why fuck with the messanger just because the question was never answered? There is no good reason for that, you un-American pile of cumdust.

Moving Sale wrote:False dichotomy

Get back to me if/when you someday comprehend what this means...

Here we go again... Why are you going after me and not the guy who threw the military under the bus to protect a rapist?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:False dichotomy

Get back to me if/when you someday comprehend what this means...

Softball much?
"In a false dichotomy (also called a false dilemma, either or, black or white, the missing middle) you are presented with two choices, when in fact there are more than two choices."

You: There's generally two specific groups of people that would pose the same damned question to someone about 500 times... a retard or a child. Which are you?

You were saying?

What's even funnier than Mizz Clinton's overreaction is Moving Sale's mentruating defense of her. Dude, mix in a Maxi-pad with your post. Your camel toe is showing.

Rooster wrote:What's even funnier than Mizz Clinton's overreaction is Moving Sale's mentruating defense of her. Dude, mix in a Maxi-pad with your post. Your camel toe is showing.

You start a whole fucking thread about how she RIPPED into someone when clearly she didn't and I need a maxi pad because I had 6 words in response? Projection much you hysterical fucktard?

Moving Sale wrote:Here we go again... Why are you going after me and not the guy who threw the military under the bus to protect a rapist?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:False dichotomy

Get back to me if/when you someday comprehend what this means...

Softball much?
"In a false dichotomy (also called a false dilemma, either or, black or white, the missing middle) you are presented with two choices, when in fact there are more than two choices."

You: There's generally two specific groups of people that would pose the same damned question to someone about 500 times... a retard or a child. Which are you?

You were saying?

You forgot that the two choices should be extremes or opposites (black or white), thus creating the lack of a middle ground. The two you were presented with are similar. Both the retard and the child lack the brain development necessary to recognize the futility of what they're doing. Again, I ask, which of the two are you?

Furthermore, the two choices I gave you are "spot on" and thus, the scenario is not fallacious. Too bad the same can't be said for your "either you're with me or against me" bullshit you throw at everyone with regard to your question to mvs... which actually, is the epitome of a false dichotomy. The fact is, I didn't see the quote you're constantly referencing, and more importantly, I don't care what his answer may be. That makes me neither "pro mvs" nor "anti tvo." I shudder to think of how much money you've wasted on educating yourself and you're still a colossal dumbfuck.

Anything else I can help you with, idiot, or are we done with me kicking your overmatched ass for the day?

I'm sorry, 'Sale, I missed what you were saying. The spotting on your white spandex unitard from your bleeding vag distracted me. What was that? You think Clinton didn't rip into that student? Well, I come from the belief that our nation's top diplomat is supposed to be the very image of calm, coolness, and collectedness. As Sec'y of State I would certainly hope that a mere student couldn't throw you off your game and make you show your temper. After all, if something so minor as that can cause a meltdown, then what can we expect when a trained diplomat purposefully attempts to make her lose her temper, and by extension, make her lose face?

The Secretary of State does not project any emotion beyond what her boss, the President, expressly wishes her to emote. Unless he wants her to demonstrate some anger in the course of carrying out her duties, then her demeanor is to be the utter personification of ice in the veins. And obviously from this and many other situations we've seen over the years, she is not up this this task. She's a rank amateur playing in the bigs, but her talent is no better than a benchwarmer in Double A.

A false dichotomy is a false choice. Period. There is a form of the false dichotomy that needs extremes or opposites, but no reputable source will say that there “should be” extremes or opposites. You are flat out wrong on that point… as usual. You used a fallacy (actually two but we both know even you are not dumb enough to try and weasel your way out of your exaggeration fallacy) pure and simple. So ask all you want as to which of the two I am, but I’m not going to answer a fallacious question.

That being said your two choices were NOT ‘spot on’ as there are many reasons to re-ask a question that was never answered. While it is true that at some point the person dodging the question can not be made to look any weaker by asking the question again, I do not feel that we have reached that point yet. You do and you are entitled to your stupid opinion, but it is an opinion with which I do not share.

I will give you props for actually answering my question, albeit on the second or third asking. You don’t care that mvskkkal threw the military under the bus to protect a rapist. Fine. It does make one wonder why you care that I care, but that is a discussion for another thread.

Finally, I did not give you a false choice. I SPECIFICALLY said that there are AT LEAST two things you could have retorted with. That clearly shows that I knew that there were other options.

Once again you have assfucked yourself in the face and came out looking like the stupid petty blowhard that you are. Props I guess.

Rooster,
AGAIN you started a thread about a non-issue (outside of the right wing talking point world) and I merely called you tard for it. Why are you projecting vaginal discharge onto me? I made a simple observation about your histrionics. Nice move Rooster little.

Rooster wrote:… her demeanor is to be the utter personification of ice in the veins.

Bullshit. There are many reasons to show emotions beyond ‘ice in the veins’ in the world of international diplomacy.
You are a fucking hack.

ucantthinkstraight,
I would say "nice edit" but you deleted the whole fucking post. Props though for only taking 2 hrs to figure out you posted a false analogy.

Suck dick much?

[quote="Moving Sale""]I will give you props for actually answering my question, albeit on the second or third asking. You don’t care that mvskkkal threw the military under the bus to protect a rapist. Fine. It does make one wonder why you care that I care, but that is a discussion for another thread.[/quote]

I answered your stupid question only to point out that the scenario you laid out is a false dichotomy, you dumbfuck. Did you make that post from KC, or were you flying over the city onto your next carnie-lesbian misadventure? Lisp some more for me about "kish" and washed up 80s bands, faggot. I am not in your camp or his camp on the issue you're raising. Do you understand?

Asking the same fucking question on a message board so many times that it becomes noticeably visible, only makes the person posing the question look weaker. Board lexicon for this practice of board bitches everywhere is called melting. Ask anyone here. I merely pointed out how futile your efforts are, and will continue to be.

Furthermore, I categorically "do not care that you care", so don't waste anymore brain cells pondering that one. I am just calling a board bitch a board bitch.

Moving Sale wrote:ucantthinkstraight,
I would say "nice edit" but you deleted the whole fucking post. Props though for only taking 2 hrs to figure out you posted a false analogy.

Suck dick much?

I have no idea what you're babbling about with this post. Sadly, neither do you.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
I answered your stupid question only to point out that the scenario you laid out is a false dichotomy, you dumbfuck.

How? Oh that’s right you are just talking out of your ass.

Did you make that post from KC, or were you flying over the city onto your next carnie-lesbian misadventure?

Bostonfuckhole say what?

Asking the same fucking question on a message board so many times that it becomes noticeably visible, only makes the person posing the question look weaker.

How? Oh that’s right because you say so.

Board lexicon for this practice of board bitches everywhere is called melting. Ask anyone here.

How? Oh that’s right because you say everybody else says so.

I merely pointed out how futile your efforts are, and will continue to be.

Futile as in mvskkkal is too much of a fuckstain to come correct? Mmmmm, I already knew that.

Furthermore, I categorically "do not care that you care", so don't waste anymore brain cells pondering that one. I am just calling a board bitch a board bitch.

No you're calling ‘bode’ when you just got your ass handed to you.

Go ahead and link me up with a site that backs your ‘false dichotomy’ definition.

Yea, I thought so.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: I have no idea what you're babbling about with this post.

Sure you don't. "Almost plausible deniability." Nice angle... for a dumbass.

The next time your lesbian carnie friend is pummeling your dimehole with a king-sized strap on... turn around and ask the whore with that faggoty lisp of yours why she dosed your midget ass. Hallucinate much?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:The next time your lesbian carnie friend is pummeling your dimehole with a king-sized strap on... turn around and ask the whore

Ah homosmack. 1998 much? 3rd grade much?

with that faggoty lisp of yours

Because you say so? Oh that's right Atomic Tranny has your back. You might want to watch out with that.

why she dosed your midget ass.

What is it you were saying about posting the same thing over and over?

Hallucinate much?

"Almost plausible deniability" much?

You got schooled on false dichotomy, hasty generalization and false analogy all in the same thread. Oh that's right you didn't post a false analogy. It was all in my imagination. Only YOU believe that.

Why did you throw the military under the bus to protect Simpson?

mvscal wrote:Good job, IB Sale.

And ‘good’ job to you mvsyellowbelly. :doh:

That's a mighty big puddle for such a little fella.

You’ve run a mighty long way from Mr. Simpson in the last few weeks eh?

Melt on...

Claiming ‘bode’ after going 'over the falls' I see.

Why do you suck at everything including racism?

Moving Sale wrote:

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:The next time your lesbian carnie friend is pummeling your dimehole with a king-sized strap on... turn around and ask the whore

Ah homosmack.

Is it really?

I accuse you of having sex with a chick... and that now makes you a "homo"? Just because you have objects stuffed up your ass, doesn't necessarily qualify you as a fag, does it?

You could be a 4 foot something eunuch with no other options for sexual gratification, for all I know. Again, this doesn’t mean you crave the cock. Maybe, just maybe, being a receiver is all you have left. Don’t sell yourself short on the whole homo thing, bro. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

I’ll defer to your knowledge of homosexuality. That just leaves you getting’s schooled on False Dichotomy, Generalization and False Analogy… and you deleted a whole post. Nice work fuckhead.

“Getting’s schooled” Really? Yessssshhh!



I don’t need your help adding in a lisp when I’m reading your drivel, but thanks. That’s how I already process your crap. Like so: “Oh ucan’t, ucan’t… it’s all about the kish, I tell ya. The kish. Don’t you see? Kish??!!”

Look, my eunuch little friend… I never claimed to be an expert on the subject of your possible homosexuality and, more importantly, I am not swabbing KY on my balloonknot in preparation for a colonoscopy by a lesbian either. Perhaps you should do some research on your own sexually deviant behavior and get back to me on whether or not your acts of depravity give you pickle puffer status. Or don’t.

Typosmack and more homosmack. You're on a roll. Actually you just got your ass handed to you on every prescient point. Nice going fuckhole.

If you click your heels and say this once more, will you be transported to a magical place where this becomes reality? If so, tell my deleted post I said hello. Is it even possible to run typosmack on someone who has voice recognition software that picks up his every lisp? I am categorically NOT calling you gay... You dig lesbians and oil derricks. Don't sweat it.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:If you click your heels and say this once more, will you be transported to a magical place where this becomes reality?

Anybody with a brain can see you bailed on your FD take. Anybody with a brain knows that you got you ass handed to you on every relevant point in this thread. The stupid ones can even goggle FD to find out that I was right and you are just a pompous fuckhole.

If so, tell my deleted post I said hello.

At least you came correct on one point.

Is it even possible to run typosmack on someone who has voice recognition software that picks up his every lisp?

Again where did you get this info? From a tranny? Good show.

You dig lesbians

So what?

So why DID you bail on your FD take?

Don't worry I already know the answer. Now have another cucumber sando and discuss pralines with Anoria, it would be more productive than giving me the opportunity to pummel you like the dead horse that you are.

Dolt.

Actually, the most salient point to date in this thread is that you really believe that asking a question 15-20 times doesn't make you look like you're melting. We can dance around the issue all you want... at the end of the day you're the one shitting in your pants because someone is ignoring you. That makes you a bitch. Got it?

You were saying?

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... 70#p610470

Wrong much?