T1B

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 1:48 am**

The Fluke will be corrected.

Revenge comes in the form of an asswhooping on national TV, to kick off the BTPCFB season, no less.

Hopefully, the Team That Represents Everything Good will show up in a uniform ensemble that makes that abomination you call a "field" look even more stupid than it already does.

While I won't be joining you in Boise, please know that I'll still be hating you, and that sorry group of assfaces that comprise your wretched "fanbase" with all my might.

Don't be suprised if your bunch of undersized cheap-shot artists suffers some retribution for last year's cheap shots... you tardlies have it coming.

So, in other words...

We on for a week-long siggy, Feeldicks?

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:45 am**

1-Oregon better win this time.

2-Oregon unis + the blue turf = jesus fucking christ.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:49 am**

Actually have someone who has taken a few snaps at QB this time around.

So the Buncos will probably try to cheap shot him out of the game, as per their style.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:54 am**

Van wrote: 2-Oregon unis + the blue turf = jesus fucking christ.

not only that, for OU fan it's "the horrible shit that happened in 06" bowl.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:17 am**

King Crimson wrote:
Van wrote: 2-Oregon unis + the blue turf = jesus fucking christ.
not only that, for OU fan it's "the horrible shit that happened in 06" bowl.

Excellent point there. Exactly who does who OU fan root against more there? Do they hate more on The Pac 10 Refs/We Fucked Ourselves Debacle Team, or do they hate more on the We Got Raped By A Mid-Major In A BCS Bowl Game Debacle Team?

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:25 am**

I think the general OU fan would rather point at the PAC 10 Ref boosters and crow, "You've been Boised!"

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:40 am**

Van wrote:
King Crimson wrote:
Van wrote: 2-Oregon unis + the blue turf = jesus fucking christ.
not only that, for OU fan it's "the horrible shit that happened in 06" bowl.
Excellent point there. Exactly who does who OU fan root against more there? Do they hate more on The Pac 10 Refs/We Fucked Ourselves Debacle Team, or do they hate more on the We Got Raped By A Mid-Major In A BCS Bowl Game Debacle Team?

actually, Bama (Utah) and Michigan (App St.) have taken some of the burden away in terms of the latter. truth is: that OU team overachieved to win the Big XII with a WR at QB and Peterson hurt down the conference stretch run. they were also VERY young up front. last year's senior OL were all soph starters then. and i'd say were the weakest Big XII champ since KSU (03) or Colorado (01).

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:08 am**

Van wrote:2-Oregon unis + the blue turf = jesus fucking christ.

The game hasn't even been played yet, and my retinas (or is it retinae?) are already burning from the mere thought of that.

Thanks for the sig, btw.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 1:58 pm**

Van wrote: Do they hate more on The Pac 10 Refs/We Fucked Ourselves Debacle Team, or do they hate more on the We Got Raped By A Mid-Major In A BCS Bowl Game Debacle Team?

how did OU fuck itself against Oregon? just curious.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:46 pm**

King Crimson wrote:
Van wrote: 2-Oregon unis + the blue turf = jesus fucking christ.
not only that, for OU fan it's "the horrible shit that happened in 06" bowl.

I'd prefer BSU win this game... hate Oregon's cheating conference asses more than BSU.

The cheap shots in that game weren't limited to BSU in last year's game either Din's.

Van wrote: Excellent point there. Exactly who does who OU fan root against more there? Do they hate more on The Pac 10 Refs/We Fucked Ourselves Debacle Team, or do they hate more on the We Got Raped By A Mid-Major In A BCS Bowl Game Debacle Team?

Losing in OT in what was the highest scoring BCS game in history of the BCS is getting raped?

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:50 pm**

King Crimson wrote:actually, Bama (Utah) and Michigan (App St.) have taken some of the burden away in terms of the latter. truth is: that OU team overachieved to win the Big XII with a WR at QB and Peterson hurt down the conference stretch run. they were also VERY young up front. last year's senior OL were all soph starters then. and i'd say were the weakest Big XII champ since KSU (03) or Colorado (01).

Pretty much... that was one of Bob's best coaching jobs while at OU even getting us into a BCS game.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:50 pm**

King Crimson wrote:
Van wrote: Do they hate more on The Pac 10 Refs/We Fucked Ourselves Debacle Team, or do they hate more on the We Got Raped By A Mid-Major In A BCS Bowl Game Debacle Team?
how did OU fuck itself against Oregon? just curious.

Simple. Despite all OU Fan's whining over that call, they still had more than ample opportunity to not fold, and they passed on that opportunity.

That one call didn't lose the game for OU.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:03 pm**

Van wrote:
King Crimson wrote:
Van wrote: Do they hate more on The Pac 10 Refs/We Fucked Ourselves Debacle Team, or do they hate more on the We Got Raped By A Mid-Major In A BCS Bowl Game Debacle Team?
how did OU fuck itself against Oregon? just curious.
Simple. Despite all OU Fan's whining over that call, they still had more than ample opportunity to not fold, and they passed on that opportunity.

That one call didn't lose the game for OU.

sure. that's one way to look at it. if the play stands, the game is over.

but, if you want to talk about whining....you've been posting about losing to Stanford and all the intricate nuances of that perfect storm for 9 months. :wink:

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:06 pm**

Van wrote:
King Crimson wrote:
Van wrote: Do they hate more on The Pac 10 Refs/We Fucked Ourselves Debacle Team, or do they hate more on the We Got Raped By A Mid-Major In A BCS Bowl Game Debacle Team?
how did OU fuck itself against Oregon? just curious.
Simple. Despite all OU Fan's whining over that call, they still had more than ample opportunity to not fold, and they passed on that opportunity.

That one call didn't lose the game for OU.

Yeah, they did kinda let Mr. Dixon march almost 200 yards in 2 minutes... there was that.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:11 pm**

FLW Buckeye wrote:I think the general OU fan would rather point at the PAC 10 Ref boosters and crow, "You've been Boised!"

What's worse is people ignore the PI call on the drive that gave them the field goal where the ball is perfect spiral coming out of the the Oregon QB's hands in the pocket but suddenly starts going end over end which made it a live ball at that point... a full 2 seconds before contact between the Oklahoma DB makes contact with the Oregon WR.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:15 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:Yeah, they did kinda let Mr. Dixon march almost 200 yards in 2 minutes... there was that.

Oregon didn't drive 200 yards... the drove a full 82 yards on two drives... 33 of those yards aided by a bogus PI call where there is no denying the OU DLine made contact with the ball at the line of scrimmage... but lets not let facts get in the way of a perfectly idiotic argument.

It was okay to screw Oklahoma on two calls in the last 2 minutes of the game because we drove 82 yards...

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:16 pm**

KC, the difference is I haven't been whining about the Stanford loss. I've merely been explaining what went into it, and I ultimately laid the blame for the loss squarely where it belongs: at Pete's feet, due to his poor response to all the injuries which occured during the game.

Following the Oregon-OU game, OU Fan went ballistic. The OU president even called for some sort of investigation, or boycott, or assassination, or some shit.

Many an OU Fan, such as yourself, apparently, still seems to think that a sixty minute football game was decided on one call.

Like Dins said, even after the onside kick OU still retained the option of, oh, I dunno, not lying down for Oregon like some Bangkok whore.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:40 pm**

Van wrote:KC, the difference is I haven't been whining about the Stanford loss. I've merely been explaining what went into it, and I ultimately laid the blame for the loss squarely where it belongs: at Pete's feet, due to his poor response to all the injuries which occured during the game.

Following the Oregon-OU game, OU Fan went ballistic. The OU president even called for some sort of investigation, or boycott, or assassination, or some shit.

Many an OU Fan, such as yourself, apparently, still seems to think that a sixty minute football game was decided on one call.

Like Dins said, even after the onside kick OU still retained the option of, oh, I dunno, not lying down for Oregon like some Bangkok whore.

They got their points off yet another blown call. Oklahoma had led almost the entire game up until the last two minutes when the officials went nutty and roughshod to ensure the Oregon comeback. When a ball is touched by a defender it becomes live!!! The ball is obviously touched... balls don't go from perfect spirals to dead ducks (pun intended) in mid flight! Secindly Williams doesn't even touch the receiver until the receiver makes contact with the ball!

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:48 pm**

Right. And nowhere else in the game could Oregon Fan point to blown calls which hurt Oregon.

The entire sixty minute game came down to those two plays.

Gotcha.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:45 pm**

Van wrote: Many an OU Fan, such as yourself, apparently, still seems to think that a sixty minute football game was decided on one call.

all i said was that the game would have been over had the correct call been made. it's the easiest card in the world to play the 60 minutes vs. one call thing, that's not exactly philosophy.

and just because you say you're not whining and other people are doesn't make it so. it's merely an assertion. i'd wager you've posted far more about the Stanford game than I've posted about this Oregon game *and* the Bradford concussion at Tech L (which, like USC-Stanford, keeps OU out of the BCS game) combined.

Posted: **Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:01 pm**

The Bradford concussion at Tech isn't even remotely comparable to what USC experienced in the Stranford game, and no, I haven't posted nearly as much about that game as OU Fan posted in the immediate aftermath of the Oregon game.

Not even close.

Bottom line, OU still had that game against Oregon won, and they collapsed. In the immediate aftermath OU Fan lost their fucking minds. They've been youtube-ing ever since. Then, c'mon, when the president of an academic institution responds the way OU's did there, well...

Comedy.

Posted: **Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:35 pm**

Dinsdale wrote: We on for a week-long siggy, Feeldicks?

Posted: **Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:47 pm**

Dinsdale wrote: So the Buncos will probably try to cheap shot him out of the game, as per their style.

oh fuck me running-not you

I actually thought you would be the last cat to resort to this sort of shit

Dinsdale wrote: We on for a week-long siggy, Feeldicks?

done

Posted: **Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:00 pm**

Felix wrote:
done

Although I'm also open to the idea of sig mosification/truncation, in the event either of us finds a BCO quote that just needs to be memorialized, since you and I seem to be the ones who "enjoy" his "work" the most.

Posted: **Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:50 pm**

Van wrote:The Bradford concussion at Tech isn't even remotely comparable to what USC experienced in the Stranford game, and no, I haven't posted nearly as much about that game as OU Fan posted in the immediate aftermath of the Oregon game.

No, but you sure out-worded them. What you lacked in quantity, you more than made up for in length.

Posted: **Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:05 pm**

Would you blame a skunk for stinking?

Would you counsel Adriana Lima to take a pass on wearing sexy clothes?

Would you demand Prince sing in a baritone?

Dammit, why can't you just love me for who I am??

:)

Posted: **Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:36 pm**

Van wrote:Would you blame a skunk for stinking?

Would you counsel Adriana Lima to take a pass on wearing sexy clothes?

Would you demand Prince sing in a baritone?

Dammit, why can't you just love me for who I am??

:)

mutherfucker please, i think what Buckeye meant was *lacked in quality* and not quantity above.

Posted: **Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:22 pm**

Dinsdale wrote: Don't be suprised if your bunch of undersized cheap-shot artists suffers some retribution for last year's cheap shots... you tardlies have it coming.

^^^^^ there's you're sig for the week Dins-wear it proudly

who'da thought that form of "retribution" would manifest itself in the form of the ultimate cheap shot

irony, thy name is LaGarrette Blount

over/under on the number of times ESPN replays Blounts best hit of the game

150

Posted: **Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:25 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:
Felix wrote:
done

Although I'm also open to the idea of sig mosification/truncation, in the event either of us finds a BCO quote that just needs to be memorialized, since you and I seem to be the ones who "enjoy" his "work" the most.

agreed....his sig generating abilities are like a city bus-if you happen to miss the first one, another will be right around the corner

Posted: **Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:35 pm**

Felix wrote:
Dinsdale wrote: Don't be suprised if your bunch of undersized cheap-shot artists suffers some retribution for last year's cheap shots... you tardlies have it coming.

^^^^^ there's you're sig for the week Dins-wear it proudly

ha ha. no kidding about irony.

Posted: **Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm**

LaGarrette Blount's secret preparation techniques for the Boise State game

sorry, I couldn't resist :D

Posted: **Fri Sep 04, 2009 3:55 pm**

L,R
Blount, Oregon's hopes and dreams

T1B

Yo, Felix...

Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...

Re: Yo, Felix...