T1B

And not in a good way.

Chubby, pan faced Asians just don't get it done.

Guys in Berkeley don't give a shit about the female cheerleaders, dude. You know that.

Bet she can conjugate the living fuck out of a verb though.

Well DAMMIT Van you just don't get it do you. Being able to conjugate verbs, especially in different tenses is a talent most cheerleaders just don't have. I mean, how many hotties can flash their racks while conjugating verbs? Sheesh......

It shouldn't have to be an either/or deal.

At Cal, you get to be meh looking, good at calculus AND a cheerleader.

They have to be smart to figure out important Cal things. Like if the football team's plane leaves on a Tuesday at 1:46pm and has a 3 hour layover in Denver will they beat the cheerlaeder's bus which left on Monday at 8:00 averaging 71mph en route to a December destination of the Sun Bowl in El Paso?

Vannie, you're acting the retard again

....why to you hate hot smart chicks ?



Major:
Media Studies; Public Health




Major:
Art, Practice of; Integrative Biology




Major:
Media Studies




Major:
Psychology




Major:
History




Major:
Legal Studies




Major:
American Studies

Wow, I think there's no doubt m2 has proven he's gay (though just the fact that he roots for a gay school should be enough evidence). Not 1 hot chick in the bunch and most are flat out butt fuckin' ugly. Damn, gotta put a paper bag over their face to hit that shit.

Heterosexuals around America... happen to disagree.

But, what would a 'Midwesterner' and a 'coonass' know...


http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2292 ... on#page/14

Blueblood wrote:Vannie, you're acting the retard again

....why to you hate hot smart chicks ?

I don't. They're my favorite kind of chick, actually.






Nope, she's definitely not one. She's barely a C+ hottie. I won't be an idiot and call any of these girls ugly or anything, because they're definitely not ugly, but that chick is not hot...at all.





Flat chested, pan faced Asian. Check.



Pretty decent. Best of your group here.



Pretty smile, but nothing that would threaten the USC or Oregon teams of cheerleaders.



Sissy Spacek, with a bad crack habit??



Just great, if we ever need to round up a likely candidate to take the kids to soccer practice.




Sissy's even smaller breasted crack dealer?



"Hi! For a group of major college cheerleaders, we're entirely mediocre!"

[/quote]

'This bitch on my left is making me look awfully plain. I'm gonna sabotage her tampon.'

2ool wrote:Major:
American Studies

Code for...

Major:
Dicksucking Housewife

Major:
Nose




Major:
Teeth



Major:
Porn




Major:
Korean




Major:
Meth




Major:
Secretary




Major:
Dairy Queen

I'm a realist and at my age I would fuck the fried rice out of all those bitches and then tell them to go rustle me up some "yum-yum shrimp" before I call the local ICE/INS office.

the issue isn't so much who'd you dong outside of the internetz but rather whom you see fit to post in a hottie thread.

Homosexuals around America... happen to disagree.

But, what would a 'Midwesterner' and a queer from Berkeley know...

THOSE CHICKS ARE BUTT FUCKING UGLY!

If you put a paper bag over their faces, downed a case of Natty Light, I still wouldn't even let them give me a fucking handjob.

The fact that m2 is trying to dispute this only proves he's queer.

M Club wrote:the issue isn't so much who'd you dong outside of the internetz but rather whom you see fit to post in a hottie thread.

+100, and Jon's a lying sack of shit.

This...



...isn't remotely ugly, nor would he even begin to turn it down if it were offered, which it never would be.

The worst girl there, even the lip-less Dairy Queen chick, she'd still run roughshod over Jon's real world. He's fucked WAY worse, and he was grateful to do so, and he'd be thrilled to do so again.

M Club is right, though. In terms of 'hottie thread' girls, much less cheerleaders, this is a decidedly meh group, and m2 kicks his own ass by posting them.

Then again, who among us here really believes that wasn't the m2 troll handler's obvious intent? He certainly could've located much hotter pics of Cal cheerleaders. Instead, he targeted and posted exactly what I described, only with one outlier, just to make this effort seem halfway plausible.

The troll handler was simply trying to make m2/Cal look bad.

Van wrote:

M Club wrote:the issue isn't so much who'd you dong outside of the internetz but rather whom you see fit to post in a hottie thread.

+100, and Jon's a lying sack of shit.

This...



...isn't remotely ugly, nor would he even begin to turn it down if it were offered, which it never would be.

The worst girl there, even the lip-less Dairy Queen chick, she'd still run roughshod over Jon's real world. He's fucked WAY worse, and he was grateful to do so, and he'd be thrilled to do so again.

M Club is right, though. In terms of 'hottie thread' girls, much less cheerleaders, this is a decidedly meh group, and m2 kicks his own ass by posting them.

Then again, who among us here really believes that wasn't the m2 troll handler's obvious intent? He certainly could've located much hotter pics of Cal cheerleaders. Instead, he targeted and posted exactly what I described, only with one outlier, just to make this effort seem halfway plausible.

The troll handler was simply trying to make m2/Cal look bad.

Think what you want if it makes you feel better...........

3 of them are butt ugly.
2 of them are just kinda meh
and that last one (blonde chick) looks like she was hot when she was in college. Oh wait, she's still in college? My bad.

More your speed, perhaps?

Van wrote:

M Club wrote:the issue isn't so much who'd you dong outside of the internetz but rather whom you see fit to post in a hottie thread.

+100, and Jon's a lying sack of shit.

This thread was never a hottie thread. It was Vannie saying that the Cal cheerleaders were ugly and I proved him wrong.


If you want a hottie thread that represents your University.... then, Cal would win hands down.





I'll call up... Brooke Berry to your whoever.






I win.

No, m2, like JSC said, your pics only proved me right. That was about the most meh group of cheerleaders ever posted.

Only one of them was hot. The rest were no better than C+, and a couple them really weren't anybody's idea of 'hot'.

As a cheerleading group, they suck.

Van wrote:No, m2, like JSC said, your pics only proved me right. That was about the most meh group of cheerleaders ever posted.

Only one of them was hot. The rest were no better than C+, and a couple them really weren't anybody's idea of 'hot'.

As a cheerleading group, they suck.

You agreed with Club Foot (+100).... that it was now a hottie thread.

Van wrote:

M Club wrote:the issue isn't so much who'd you dong outside of the internetz but rather whom you see fit to post in a hottie thread.

+100

Suck it up and post a chick hotter than Brooke Berry... from your school.





Just another reminder.... of why Cal chicks are the hottest on the planet.

Blueblood wrote:
...Club Foot ...

seven weeks of a kal education..

M Club wrote:

Blueblood wrote:
...Club Foot ...

seven weeks of a kal education..

God help the "Midwest".... please!

Idiot just posted a photo of a chick that's better looking than most of those butt ugly Cal cheerleaders.

Geez moron, can't you Google "fat midwest women"??? Tard.

TheJON wrote:Idiot just posted a photo of a chick that's better looking than most of those butt ugly Cal cheerleaders.

I guess we have a different definition of hot.

I guess we have a different definition of hot.

Agreed.

My definition.



Your definition.



"The Truth" telling it like it is........for once......

m2, check the title of the thread. Check my initial post.

This is about Cal's cheerleaders, not your handpicked internet hotties. You know, it should be easy to combine college cheerleaders with hotties. They should be one and the same.

Yours aren't, except for one.

Cal's cheerleaders suck this year.

Van wrote:m2, check the title of the thread. Check my initial post.

This is about Cal's cheerleaders, not your handpicked internet hotties. You know, it should be easy to combine college cheerleaders with hotties. They should be one and the same.

Yours aren't, except for one.

Cal's cheerleaders suck this year.

Just as I suspected.... after an hour and a half of looking.... you couldn't find a chick from U$C hotter than a Cal chick.

Cal's cheerleaders suck this year.

TheJON wrote:

Dude, is that Netboy Reid?

Also, as for the thread... here ya go, mTool. I'll take the Pepsi Challenge with your Cal bitches. And I'll raise you, roughly 1000 billion percent, the odds of getting your dick sucked during the rating process.

http://www.thelostogle.com/2007/07/08/y ... porn-star/

the_ouskull