T1B

tOSU totally dominated that game.

Sin,
Vanalyst

Jsc810 wrote:Whoa, that was 4th down.


That's one hell of a what if. Did they review that play at the time?

Why your favorite team isn't the Philadelphia Freedom... still baffles me to this day.

That picture is very inconclusive. you can't tell if the knee is down since the ankle and foot of the USC OL is blocking the view of the RB's knee.

USC has a habit of doing this.

MuchoBulls wrote:That picture is very inconclusive. you can't tell if the knee is down since the ankle and foot of the USC OL is blocking the view of the RB's knee.

So what your saying is that the replay officials shouldn't have overturned the call on the field because of inconclusive evidence? Gotcha.

Sin,
Armando Allen

Allen's play had much more conclusive proof on replay.

MuchoBulls wrote:Allen's play had much more conclusive proof on replay.

Not on the ABC cameras. One looked like he might be out, the other looked like he was in.

Killian wrote:

MuchoBulls wrote:Allen's play had much more conclusive proof on replay.

Not on the ABC cameras. One looked like he might be out, the other looked like he was in.

for the record, lefty pointed out the replay officials now have access to more feeds than just what abc feeds them.

MClub if that is the way it came across then I didn't do a good job.

The replay booth has access to the raw feed from all ABC's cameras, not just what is broadcast out to the world. So the replay booth can look at every camera angle, despite what we see at home.

Wheres the pic from OSUs TD that the refs called after seeing the guy was laying on his back on the 2 yard line?