Page 1 of 1
WWJD?
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:35 pm
by PISC
TOB = Lost cause.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:37 pm
by PISC
BTW, PPR league, set up much like Jackasses, prolly just some more bonus points for total yards and extended touchdown plays.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:01 pm
by BSmack
A lot depends on how many starters you need for each position. If you only are allowed to start 1 RB, then that deal makes some sense. But if you're allowed to start 2 RBs, then no, you would be an idiot to make that deal.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:23 pm
by War Wagon
Duane
Which Steve Smith are you talking about?
The one who plays for Carolina or the one who plays for the Giants?
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:08 pm
by PISC
Carolina....best I could get and Gore was just going to rot on my bench really unless MJD is a bust or one goes down.
Andre Johnson and Reggie Wayne are untouchable so if I am to upgrade at WR signifcantly it'd only be Moss or possibly Fitzgerald.
Yea, B, 2 RB but we also start 3 WR and there are some that are coming out strong.
1) I have a Flacco or RIvers with Benson-Addai-TO-Andre Johnson team in div.
2) Chris Johnson-Hightower/Forte, Wayne-Desean Jackson - Welker - Mason - Gates on top of the league
3) Brees-Grant-Jacobs-McGahee-Colston-Ocho leading the third
So about half of the 12 teams are pretty decent and while RB's still pack the bigger punch, strong WR can be a problem especially if their QB kills it.
Another with Warner, Westbrook, DeAngelo, Boldin and the other Smith has got some threat to it too.
Although I surely agree this could be idiotic, I just wonder what the dip between MJD and Sproles or the others mentioned would be week in and week out compared to what I gain with Moss over TJ (who I think is going to dip dramatically with what SEA looks like), Driver. So far the kid (LR) is looking to take the #2 spot and Coles and Bennett highly suspect for any real contributions. Maybe I roll AP, MJD, Smit, Driver, Robsinson for a couple and see what happens.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:53 pm
by PISC
K, whatever loser, that's why two people responded. You should look up the definition of nobody idiot.
Nice try.
uh so, Fitzgerald has just been thrown on the table.
:o
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 7:28 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
PISC wrote:K, whatever loser, that's why two people responded.
Both of them asked your dumbass for more information because your 3rd grade drivel is barely readable.
Did you supersize your combo-bet this weekend, tool?
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:12 pm
by PISC
yea yea loser, got that tired memo from other illiterates that didn't learn how to read and write as well as I do. Gee, I wonder why these people with college degrees ask me to read their e-mails before sending or flat out take over the explanations in addition to leading conference calls and meetings if I communicate like a 3rd grader. Yea that'd have nothing to do with my ability to communicate with intelligence and professionalism. Please do yourself a favor and shut up, it will help prevent the constant embarrassment you put upon yourself for publicly displaying your idiocy or your cries for attention. Fuck, I really feel sorry for the losers around here like you and with your ability to contribute absolutely nothing it only further proves how you are so desperate for attention from people like me. I offer my apologies to you for your miserable life.
Sorry you're such a fucking moron and uh not sure what I am doing this week after that perfect week one but thanks for asking idiot.
LOL I mean look how stupid you are...HE asked a question because there are two Steve Smiths, where is B's question moron? What are you not able to understand? I mean you're reading skills are so good right....there should be two questions from each if they BOTH asked questions? Come on moron, either you are proving you can’t read or you didn’t read shit, either case shut the fuck up. Talk about 3rd grade, you're just crying for anybody to respond to you.
A clarification between two receivers with the same name wouldn't indicate to anybody but a stupid fuck like you that they had any problem comprehending my message. So sad kid. Damn what must it be like to be so fucking stupid?
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:34 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
If Brian didn't intimate he wasn't sure how many RB's were in your starting line-up, why did you feel compelled to expand upon it? Question, no? None there. However. Did you not provide him with answer he was looking for? Are you seriously debating this fact?
I eagerly await your meltdown via PM to accompany your next response God awful response.
PISC wrote:Yea that'd have nothing to do with my ability to communicate with intelligence and professionalism.
If your composition skills at work rival those displayed here, then I pity your company. Speaking of which... shouldn't you be windexing the snot screen above the salad bar at the Old Country Buffet or something? I imagine the dinner crowd in herding its way into your place of business.
Chop chop, genius.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:42 pm
by Paul
PISC wrote:k douchebags, gimme your opinion or tell me to fuck off.
Fair enough.....FUCK OFF.
![hfal :hfal:](./images/smilies/flipa.gif)
:twisted:
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:24 pm
by PISC
Damn, you're gonna start earning my respect Paul.
Hey idiot, CLARIFYING or asking for specific details needed to give an educated response does not equate to a lack of understanding. This is further evidence of your illiteracy and your inability to comprehend the language. Pity whatever the fuck you want, but you will still be too stupid to know the meaning of words and will continue to fail in your weak ass attempts to criticize someone who obviously has superior intelligence.
BTW, my company kicks ass. While most of the country was pinching pennies, losing everything and stressed out about lay offs, we were cruising. We're a major player in cable communications, based on SoCal and you're still a loser living somewhere that needs a boost in their education fund. Try again buddy. A rambling ignorant, idiot like yourself can not spew nonsense that is going to phase me. I eagerly await the first time I can detect some actual intelligence coming from your stupid fuck mind.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:34 pm
by PISC
LOL and how hard is it to figure out that I am considering MJD for Moss if I am able to acquire a back up in LJ, TJ or McGahee?
I mean you're coming in here like an idiot basically telling everybody that you don't understand what the guys above were able to. I guess if they asked how many teams were in the league or how many points we get for receptions/yards, it would have been further evidence that my post is incapable of being understood by a 3rd grader. IDIOT, getting further detail regarding what I have to field is not an inability to UNDERSTAND what i posted. I didn't mention what I start or points or anything so if I don't talk about that subject matter it is not being misunderstood, it isn't even there to consider you fucking retard. Fuck dude, you are a moron man, waste of fucking space. How can you be so fucking stupid dude?
Well, keep trying jr. I'm really hoping for you now. You're like a dog trying to get out of the swimming pool. Come on buddy, we're all just right up here....with a little effort....awwwwwww, come on buddy, try again.......LOL such a loser.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:40 pm
by PISC
Uh yea idiot, I did provide the clarification/answer once he indicated that his answer was dependent on my league's starting roster requirement. As matter of fact, Brian answered the question providing an answer in advance for either scenario. God you're dumb.
Save it man, you lost. You're in a hole you can't get out of. Maybe you will make yourself feel better but you would be better off walking away because you obviously can't read and have NO football input here, not a surprise.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:14 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
PISC wrote:Hey idiot, CLARIFYING or asking for specific details needed to give an educated response does not equate to a lack of understanding.
You're right, it means the asshat posing the question didn't supply his audience with enough information to give said asshat an educated answer. Did you really think I was saying Wags or Brian was stupid?
This reflects poorly upon the dumbfuck who asked a the stupid question, not the people requesting more information or giving multiple scenarios.
I bet you're a real hoot on these conference calls: "Excuse me, PISS, but what in the fuck are you babbling about?"
"PISS... that doesn't make sense at all. Can you please clarify your position?" "PISS. Clean-up on aisle 7." Etc.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:06 pm
by Dinsdale
PISC wrote:God you're dumb.
What a difference a comma makes.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:10 am
by Paul
Sometimes I really wonder if Duane is really THIS guy:
![Image](http://copronymous.com/tourettesguy.jpg)
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:46 pm
by PISC
Quit while you're ahead Paul.
At least you can say you did better than the other two and didn't provide anything to show that you are in sreious need of medical attention. You're coming up but take it slow, baby steps. One of these days, Dins might actually put two sentences together but he might need to get beyond trying to put that square peg in the round hole.
Re: WWJD?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:09 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
PISC wrote:At least you can say you did better than the other two
The 'other two' that pounded you into submission, causing you to triple post at one point, and go back and edit your original post to just these three words: "I was run."
Yeah... you're doing awesome here.