T1B

Maybe the best team in the NFL...

Okay,I was off by a few weeks...

Diogenes wrote:

IndyFrisco wrote:Will mJew be runned from the NFL Forum too after his kalfag Rodgers shits the bed here?

The Pack will melt and he'll be back bandwagoning the faggy-niners by week 8.

And BTW, 'best team in Kali' is no compliment. Look at the other bottom feeders in the category.

.m2 wrote: Maybe the best team in the NFL...

I laughed.

Taking it to the next level....








The Niners just went from a team that should be 4-0....



To possible Super Bowl Champions.




The best wide-receiver in College Football history signed.... and Frank Gore will be coming back in a week.



The Niners lost on a hail-Mary... on the last play of the game. (to a team thought to be the team to beat) ON THE ROAD.

Without.... Frank "the tank" Gore.




Two game lead in the NFC West... and the best D- fense in the NFL.




Things are going as planned .... in San Francisco.







m2 is the truth

.m2 wrote:Taking it to the next level...

right before you hang yourself, again, in multiple threads and forums.

Didn't we retire the Cryan Ryan award?

May be time for a comeback.

Two game lead in the NFC West... and the best D- fense in the NFL.

Wrong on both counts.

Idiot.

My bad....


The "Jim Brown" of wide-receivers.... just showed up.



<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9aJZsjImymc&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9aJZsjImymc&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]





m2 is the truth

A rookie wide receiver coming off a foot surgery, who sat out of OTAs, training camp and missed the first 4 weeks of the regular season and he is just going to step in an become the last piece of the puzzle for the Niners? He may be a factor- by week 11... The only reason he might help this season is the Niners play in such a shit division that they don't need to win that many games to make the playoffs. By next season- you might have an argument- but he has to learn the playbook, get a rapport with Hill, adjust to the speed of the game, etc... before he'll be any good to the team.

Also- christening them as possibly the best team in the NFL? Who have they beaten again?

Glad to see things haven't changed much in my time away...

War Wagon wrote:

.m2 wrote:Taking it to the next level...

right before you hang yourself, again, in multiple threads and forums.

Didn't we retire the Cryan Ryan award?

May be time for a comeback.

Truer words have never been spoken. Da Troof is really Da GOOF.

mvscal wrote:

Diogenes wrote:

Two game lead in the NFC West... and the best D- fense in the NFL.

Wrong on both counts.

Idiot.

They have a two game lead in the NFC West...idiot.

No. They don't.

Moron.

R-Jack wrote:one and half games back

At least you got something right.

mvscal wrote:I still suck at math

No shit.

Diocockgobbler and m2ool are clearly related.

Paul wrote:Diocockgobbler and m2ool are clearly related.

Where do you fit on the tree? Oh I know, you're the FAT FUCKING RETARD of the tard family.

BSmack wrote:Where do you fit on the tree? Oh I know, you're the FAT FUCKING RETARD of the tard family.

....and the tree-hugging anklebiter chimes in. Ponderous.

Why does it matter if a team is the "best in California?"

There's no California League -- 'sup, TRAVIS.

It's just a m0ronic topic which has rightfully been followed up by a variety of m0ronic posts.

mvscal wrote:At least we all learned that 3-1 = 1.5. Who knew?

I guess that means you still think 1-2 =0 ?

You really should avoid math, dipshit. But for the record...

Where [x] represents absolute value of x
W1 and L1 are the wins and losses of leaders
W2 and L2 are the wins and losses of trailer
Gb is the number of games back

([W1-W2]+[L1-L2])/2=Gb

If you still don't get it, I'm unsurprised.

Lassie a yum yum wrote:Why does it matter if a team is the "best in California?"

It's just a m0ronic topic which has rightfully been followed up by a variety of m0ronic posts.

Sin,

The WORST team in California/NFL over the last 7 years and running.






Speaking of the shit organization and its shit fans.....


Mike Silver's scoop: Tom Cable threatened to kill...


Oh, my !
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=m ... &type=lgns






The Raiders.


What a JOKE

Yeah, I'm sure nobody here has been dialed in to the fact that Oakland has sucked hind tit for 6+ years, thanks.

Why don't you pull down your Ren' Faire Three Musketeer knickerbockers and gaze just south of your belly button and I'll dial you in to a fact that the board is all too aware of?

You got short-changed a dick.

Yw.


And btw, dickless, the only reason any hetero male would attend a Ren' Faire event is because his fat, four-toothed, mammy and his hen-pecked Nancyboy dork dad have dragged him along.

I'm pretty sure a Star Wars Convention -- with the great James Doohan as the headliner -- attracts fewer social squirrels than these faggot-in-the-woods gathering you are so proud of.

Giving a quick glance around and noticing that half the dudes are prancing around in skirt-like gear would be enough to send 99% of us to the exit.

But not m2.

Pavlovian Doggie Style, mulling around with fellow skirt-wearing Dungeons and Dragons half-wits prompts his anus to drip.

Do yourself a favor and place your empty skull under the Ren' Faire gullotine, fizzle.

poptart wrote: I'm pretty sure a Star Wars Convention -- with the great James Doohan as the headliner -- attracts fewer social squirrels than these faggot-in-the-woods gathering you are so proud of.

Don't go mixing up Star Wars and Star Trek. :D

Isn't Scotty dead? :?

mvscal wrote:

Diogenes wrote:

mvscal wrote:At least we all learned that 3-1 = 1.5. Who knew?

I guess that means you still think 1-2 =0 ?

You really should avoid math, dipshit. But for the record...

Where [x] represents absolute value of x
W1 and L1 are the wins and losses of leaders
W2 and L2 are the wins and losses of trailer
Gb is the number of games back

([W1-W2]+[L1-L2])/2=Gb

If you still don't get it, I'm unsurprised.

([3-1] + [1-2])/2 = .5,

Glad to see your reading comprehension is as good as your math.

As in, non-existent.

Dipshit.

mvscal wrote:You lost head to head.

Which would actually mean something if there were no more head to head games on the schedule, or if the Cards ended up down two receivers again on Dec 14. Good luck on that happening. By definition tiebreaks have nothing to do with games back. But at least you've quit pretending to understand basic math. Props on that, I guess.


Dipshit.

R-Jack wrote:Jesus jumproping Christ. The Cards have to win TWO more games (at least) than the Niners to catch up to them at seasons end. How more fucking basic can that math be?

Pretty basic. Your saying (3-1)-(1-2)=2gb. By that 'logic', if the Cards win 2 and 49ers lose 2, (3-3)=(3-2).


You should obviously avoid basic math as well.

14-0 Falcons, in the 1st qaurter.

Is m2 simply incapable of not damning his team? It's like his mere approval of something - anything - is an immediate kiss of death.

So I guess the 49ers are 1 game ahead of the Cards now. How many games are they ahead of Seattle?

49ers 3-2
Cards 2-2
Seattle 2-3

Or is (2-2)=(2-3) now?

Fucking morons.

...the only time that half games have even the slightest bit of relevance to anything is in deciding tiebreakers

How the fuck is a half game going to decide tiebreakers, dipshit? You only need tiebreakers if you are actually tied.

So if the Cards are 4-2 and the 9ers are 3-3, does that mean they're finally tied?