T1B

It wasn't Donovan McNabb's fault. He did everything he could to put this team in a position to win.

Sinc,

The National Media.


This abortion of a game was indeed sponsored by Andy Reid and Donovan McNabb.

For McNabb, it had to be the curse of Rush...

Getta load of ol' JeMarcus...17 for 28, a completion percentage higher than 40%

Screw_Michigan wrote:Yes, it's McNabb's fault that the Raiders had seven people in the fucking backfield all game long.

You are a serious tard.

He was over-throwing his wide-open receivers all fucking game. Maclin had a step on at least 3 passes that could have gone for long gains and McNabb had no touch. On an easy cross route pass to Celek, his throw was up near his helmet instead of leading him across the field and it resulted in a drop. The Raiders played a great defensive game but that meant 1-1 coverage on receivers and McNabb had no touch.

Shut the fuck up about yet another topic you have NO clue about.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Well, the what does Reid have to do with McNabb's lack of touch? Yet again, just another chance for you to skewer a fat, fucking retard, and you jump on the opportunity, even when he had nothing to do with it.

Eat shit.

Nice white flag.. glad you came around on McNabb.
Now, do some homework and check out the run vs. pass ratio for this game. Also, please educate the rest of us as to why the Eagles receivers were running such deep routes on 3rd near the end of the game? What kind of play call is that?

jim wrote:The Raiders played a great defensive game

That's pretty much it.
Very strong defensive effort by the 'duhs.

They've done that a few times this year.
But the offense, this year, has repeatedly failed to move the chains at all and keep the defense OFF the field -- resulting in a very worn out defense, most weeks.

I don't like the Eagles offensive approach.
46 passes and just 14 rushing attempts??

Fuckin' DUMB much?

If Oakland has a weakness on defense it is in defending the run.
That's been shown over and over.

This game tells us more about the Eagles than it does the Raiders, imo.

Under any circumstances, it feels damn good to see another W, if'n you're a 'dud fan.

The Raiduh D is susceptible to a balanced attack, but can bottle up a one dimensional passing offense like we saw today and vs the Chargers until Sproles broke through. A big problem for the Eagles was loss of LT Jason Peters. Not to mention Philly's Oline isn't the best at run blocking, which will be an increasing problem as the season goes on, hence Reids infatuation with the Wildcat.

"Unfortunately, if he tries the same shit against the Skins next week, he'll probably be good."


...uh yea, you can book that.

poptart wrote:If Oakland has a weakness on defense it is in defending the run.
That's been shown over and over.

This game tells us more about the Eagles than it does the Raiders, imo.

Yep.

The Jets didn't foolishly fuck around.

Just ram the ball down Oakland's throat, because they have not shown that they can really stop the run -- goin' on like 7 years, btw.

Russell took Oakland out of it early and the 'duds failed to show any brains or guts to TRY to claw back into.

Laid back and accepted the fucking.

Good girls.


Russell benched, btw.

Good move.