Re: Bad SEC Teams Knock Off ACC's Best
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 2:36 pm
Clemson isn't one of their two best teams, I don't care what the divisional standings say. UGA over Ga Tech was a nice win though.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Clemson isn't one of their two best teams, I don't care what the divisional standings say. UGA over Ga Tech was a nice win though.
Ahh, I did not know that. Yeah, that pretty much tells the story then.SunCoastSooner wrote:MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Clemson isn't one of their two best teams, I don't care what the divisional standings say. UGA over Ga Tech was a nice win though.
Georgia Tech played most of that game without Nesbitt and he's the only option QB they have right now. No way that pro style slow ass white boy was going to run the offense anywhere close to level that Nesbitt could.
Yeah, those pesky divisional standings.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: I don't care what the divisional standings say.
Big difference between Bama losing one of it's six or seven RBs on roster compared to GaTech losing it's only option QB... GINORMOUS difference.Sudden Sam wrote:Injuries are a bitch. Tech was definitely limited by the injury to Nesbitt.
Bama lost their Heisman candidate RB and managed to beat Auburn.
You just gotta suck it up.
By putting that 5-star freshman RB in there! :D
If that's the case, that he matters that little, then let's just go ahead and remove Ingram's name from the Heisman chase.Sudden Sam wrote:No doubt. Just reveling in the fact that, if Ingram is out Saturday...or not 100%...there won't be any dropoff at all.SunCoastSooner wrote:Big difference between Bama losing one of it's six or seven RBs on roster compared to GaTech losing it's only option QB... GINORMOUS difference.