Sordid clambake
https://mail.theoneboard.com/board/
I thought you didn't care?mvscal wrote:No, you don't. If you did, you would carry your monkey ass down to Narrowhead and pay your five dollars to watch the shittiest team in football get ass raped by a slightly less shitty team.War Wagon wrote:I care.
PS Fuck you.
Coods, you anklebiting piece of FUCK, the Chiefs (proper spelling, look into it sometime) never lose when I attend a game vs. the Donkeys. Now that I (yet AGAIN) knocked you down a few notches, feel free to latch on somebody else's leg- I'm not in the mood.Cuda wrote:Paul, you lazy piece of fuck, you should have reminded the fucking Chef's front office that they NEVER lose when you're in the stands. All it would have cost them is a measly fucking season ticket (well, maybe two season tickets for your fat ass) and all the rest of the KC yokels would still show up and sell out the hulking relic named Arrowhead.
Eat a cock- we ARE the best fanbase in the NFL. Well, SOME of us are ('sup Wags).Screw_Michigan wrote:War Wagon wrote:best fanbase in the NFL
I always just thought "you anklebiting fucktard" was his signature.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Why is it that every time someone responds to Paul in a disparaging way, they're an "anklebiter"?
Paul wrote:
No, it's Chiefs.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: Furthermore, it is Chefs, not Chiefs.
When the fuck did you turn into KC Yoda?Paul wrote:Eat a cock- we ARE.
Paul wrote:Well....the the vicious circle of NFL SUCKTITUDE is complete here in Kansas City. The Chiefs couldn't sell out their last home game of the season vs. the Browns, therefore they won't be on TV here within a 75-mile radius. I'd love to say I'm surprised, but I'm not.
Yeah, pretty much. It came out on Friday that Clark Hunt has been buying the tickets that needed to be sold to be considered a "sell-out", but he just couldn't see doing it anymore, particularly for a game against a team that might actually be WORSE than we are.Joe in PB wrote:Paul wrote:Well....the the vicious circle of NFL SUCKTITUDE is complete here in Kansas City. The Chiefs couldn't sell out their last home game of the season vs. the Browns, therefore they won't be on TV here within a 75-mile radius. I'd love to say I'm surprised, but I'm not.
I've seen a couple of Chief games on TV this season, looked to me the stands were about half empty when they paned around in the 2nd half. Seems to me the the Chiefs were lucky to sell out the games they did this season.
Breaking News: Tackling abolished in Kansas City!
By Doug Farrar
We don't know when during the week the decision might have made, but we're pretty sure that at some point during the preparation for their home game against the Cleveland Browns. Todd Haley and the Kansas City Chiefs apparently decided that tackling just, y'know, kinda wasn't worth it.
When the Chiefs concluded their 41-34 loss at Arrowhead Stadium with Matt Cassel's(notes) attempt to throw for a field goal at the end of the game (bringing to mind Alex Karras' famed "I keek touchdown!" reference), the Browns had amassed an astonishing 735 total yards. Key among the stars was Josh Cribbs, who returned two kickoffs for touchdowns -- 100 and 103 yards -- to set the NFL career record with eight. Not only is Cribbs the best return man of his era (sorry, Devin Hester(notes)), he's also a demon on kick coverage, and he's probably the Browns' best quarterback. One wonders what a mind like Mike Holmgren's could do with this guy...
More unexpected was the performance by fourth-year running back Jerome Harrison(notes). The former Washington State star had rushed 88 times for 301 yards all year before today, despite a very strong performance against the Bengals in Week 4 (29 carries, 121 yards). Still, who expected this? Against the Chiefs, Harrison ran 34 times for 286 yards and three touchdowns, adding in one catch for 12 yards for good measure. The performance puts him third all-time in single-game rushing yards behind Adrian Peterson and Jamal Lewis(notes). One also wonders what might have happened had Brady Quinn(notes) been able to throw for more than 66 yards -- Quinn almost outgained himself on the ground with 39 rushing yards.
Of course, the Browns pitched in with their own repugnant defensive efforts -- any time you see the Chiefs put up 34 points, problems abound. Running back Jamaal Charles(notes), another guy who needs to see more time on the field, put up 154 rushing yards of his own on 25 carries. Still, Harrison was the real story here. Whoever takes over this Browns team (and my money's on Holmgren) will have a few players to build with. Cribbs and Harrison are at the top of the list.
Paul wrote: Eat a cock- we ARE.
Take things way out of context much, fucko?Cuda wrote:Paul wrote: Eat a cock- we ARE.
Paul wrote:R-Jackoff, feel free to contribute something conducive to the discussion, or go fuck yourself. It's your call.
Then, 2.5 hours later:Paul wrote:At the VERY LEAST Haley is going to have to blow out most (if not ALL) of his assistant coaches and replace them with proven winning coaches if he is allowed to stay on as HC.
How long has Haley and staff had to change this thing? Good God...Paul wrote:Wags, you CAN'T lump Pioli in there- that guy has to have time to change the franchise. Less than one year is not enough time to do that.
No I meant what I said, dickhead.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Paul wrote:R-Jackoff, feel free to contribute something conducive to the discussion, or go fuck yourself. It's your call.
Conducive? Seriously?
Did you mean :paul: constructive? :paul:
Paul wrote:No I meant what I said, dickhead.
IndyFrisco, Pioli is Haley's boss. Pioli needs to ensure that for Haley to do his job better next year (if he's allowed to stay on as HC), he MUST fire most of his coaching staff and hire proven veteran offensive and defensive coordinators that can help Haley get this franchise going in the right direction again. Job #1 for Pioli now is to blow out a LOT of this current roster as soon as he is allowed to, and try to the best of his ability to upgrade nearly every position on the roster. The Chiefs have nearly $40 million under the cap right now, so there's no reason whatsoever why they shouldn't be serious players in free agency.IndyFrisco wrote:First:
Then, 2.5 hours later:Paul wrote:At the VERY LEAST Haley is going to have to blow out most (if not ALL) of his assistant coaches and replace them with proven winning coaches if he is allowed to stay on as HC.
How long has Haley and staff had to change this thing? Good God...Paul wrote:Wags, you CAN'T lump Pioli in there- that guy has to have time to change the franchise. Less than one year is not enough time to do that.
LOVE that board feature! :DThis post was made by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 who is currently on your ignore list.
And where are these so-called "proven OC and DC" who are willing to drop whatever gig they are currently proving themselves at to go to the clusterfuck that is the KC Chefs? You act like these individuals are as readily available as a twinkie in your cupboard. The coaching staff may or may not be a problem. What we do know is the talent, or lack thereof in KC, IS the problem. If your coaches fail with good talent, fire them then. Until then, don't expect them to win with the shit they're excreting onto the field.Paul wrote:Pioli needs to ensure that for Haley to do his job better next year (if he's allowed to stay on as HC), he MUST fire most of his coaching staff and hire proven veteran offensive and defensive coordinators that can help Haley get this franchise going in the right direction again.
And Yet they won't.Paul wrote: The Chiefs have nearly $40 million under the cap right now, so there's no reason whatsoever why they shouldn't be serious players in free agency.
Points well taken Scott, but Clark Hunt MUST field a much-improved football team for the 2010 season if he wants his newly renovated "New Arrowhead Stadium" (what a crock of BULLSHIT, btw) filled back up with loyal fans again. The only way I can see them getting there from here is by making a splash in free agency and the draft, therefore drumming up fan interest again and possibly getting a couple of primetime gametimes next year in the process.KC Scott wrote:The common misconception is that next season will be a spend-a-thon (no Cap) for those wanting to compete.
It will be the opposite for the simple reason the owners are planning to lock the players out in 2011 unless the CBA is re-done and the union is effectively broken / % of revenues is dropped substantially.
If you're planning a lock out, the last thing you want to do is give those you're locking out a boatload of cash to survive on.
I really beleive it's why the Chiefs didn't spend more this offseason.
Sure I can and Pioli damn sure has changed the franchise in less one year... they went from being a bunch of lovable losers who were at least competitive on the field, to a bunch of forlorn losers who routinely get blown the fuck out of their own stadium that they can't sell out. They are a complete laughingstock akin to Detroit, if not worse. And they ARE going to get worse (as hard as that is to believe) because they have no direction whatsoever, no guiding force making sound football decisions. They are going to suck for years because while a good coach can't make bad players good, a bad coach can undermine good players.Paul wrote:Wags, you CAN'T lump Pioli in there- that guy has to have time to change the franchise. Less than one year is not enough time to do that.
OK, I'll entertain the notion of giving Haley his pink slip once the season is over, but you're a FUCKING IDIOT if you don't think that Pioli can't get this team turned around. The dude helped shape the most dominant football team of this decade, man! He wasn't a FOUR TIME NFL Executive Of The Year winner for nothing, Wags....who knows? Maybe Pioli will see the error of his ways and gas Haley as soon as this shit season's over with. Maybe not. But I'm more than confident in knowing that Pioli by now has seen enough and is already putting the wheels in motion towards getting a lot of it corrected.War Wagon wrote:Fuck Pioli and fuck Haley. Fire both of these clowns. Admit you made a bad mistake, move on, and try to pick up the pieces.
I don't care what the man did elsewhere. That means NOTHING to me. Different circumstances, different coaches, different players.Paul wrote:The dude helped shape the most dominant football team of this decade, man! He wasn't a FOUR TIME NFL Executive Of The Year winner for nothing...
He hasn't made them any worse than they were. FACT. Now we have a better QB and starting RB (after finally gassing LJ), and picked up an above average WR that the Blots didn't need. THAT'S progress, Wags. Pioli didn't sabotage SHIT here, Carl Peterson did and NOBODY can dispute that- Carl traded the best pass-rushing DE in the NFL IN HIS FUCKING PRIME. Carl gave a rode hard and put away wet RB a boatload of cash. Carl did NOTHING to replenish the offensive line after Willie Roaf and Will Shields retired.War Wagon wrote:I don't care what the man did elsewhere. That means NOTHING to me. Different circumstances, different coaches, different players.Paul wrote:The dude helped shape the most dominant football team of this decade, man! He wasn't a FOUR TIME NFL Executive Of The Year winner for nothing...
What I care about is what he's done here, which is sabotage a once proud franchise with piss poor decision making from top to bottom. Fuck that, he doesn't get a mulligan with me. Not for one year, and certainly not for two. Fool me once. If anyone of us posting on this board did our job as poorly as he has, we'd be out of work.
Drink the Kool-Aid all you want, I'm not buying it. I'm from the Show-me State and what I've seen so far I don't want to see any more of.
In what "context" would that have made you look any better?Paul wrote:Take things way out of context much, fucko?Cuda wrote:Paul wrote: Eat a cock- we ARE.
This place looks better already. :wink:Coods wrote:This post was made by Cuda who is currently on your ignore list.
Not from where I sit- maybe if a few people here grow the fuck up then there wouldn't be a need for an "ignore" function.poptart wrote:
Fwiw, the ignore function is, imo, the biggest faggot function evar.
