T1B

Posted: **Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:56 pm**

A sig/av bet is proferred based on the result of tomorrow's titanic LSU/PSU dust-up.

Speak now or forever suckle grapesacks in peace.

Posted: **Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:07 pm**

Sudden Sam wrote:

Sorry, Dave. I'm a Bama fan.

Who knew?

Posted: **Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:30 pm**

One of the more interesting games, imo. If LSU can score more than 9 points they've got a shot.

Posted: **Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:47 pm**

Posted: **Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:29 pm**

"You play in the ACC; we played in the SEC. You gotta purdy mouth," said Shy, a typical Tennessee fan.

I couldn't help myself with this FTFY.

Posted: **Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:04 pm**

^^^

Rack.

Posted: **Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:05 pm**

I'm here you shit-lined Hanes motherfucker; I'll take that bet. However, I will offer myself to off this shit troll, Hungus-style.

Unless you prefer just a sig or out myself again. SEC 31-PSU 14

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:46 pm**

It might be a tough day for QBs on both sides.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:05 pm**

I think MSU was a good team that we beat pretty soundly. Generally though, the point is valid

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:43 pm**

LSU has played two good teams this year, and they lost to both of them too. They also lost to a meh team, so I'm not sure what point JSC is trying to make here.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:24 pm**

playing field is a disaster. jeez.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:31 pm**

Field conditions really the story so far. LSU looks a bit lackluster...

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:40 pm**

Nice red zone work from LSU's D. The end of the half doesn't want to happen...

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:47 pm**

That was an incredibly pussy call by Penn St on third and goal. A gay roll out, followed by an even more gay jump ball, which was just begging to be picked off?

Grow a pair, Darryl Clark. Jesus, you suck, every single time I see you. You are just horrible.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:56 pm**

Clark's having a tough time, but he's been better than his counterpart.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:14 pm**

Yes, but his counterpart is supposed to suck. Clark is supposed to be good.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:19 pm**

King Crimson wrote:playing field is a disaster. jeez.

They played four Florida high school championship games there two weekends ago, then the Champs Bowl this week.

Add 10+ inches of rain in December = rice patties.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:27 pm**

I just watch the games, Van...I don't absorb the yammering from the network heads. Clark has played well overall at PSU. He hasn't won the big one, true...but he hasn't exactly lost those games all by himself.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:29 pm**

And yes...Clark is not playing particularly well today.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:31 pm**

Hey Jaypa, you dickhead...Royster's a RB. Call a pass pattern to a f'n WR, you idiot.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:32 pm**

Again, with Penn State being pussies in the red zone. Clark...is...horrible. He has a nose for the endzone, the way JTR has one for pussy.

I cannot believe how soft Penn St is. Fortunately for them, LSU remains completely impotent on offense.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:33 pm**

Best sign of the day...

Jeaux Pa

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:38 pm**

LSU's going to find a way to LSU themselves another win. Penn St's pussy red zone play calling is going to ensure it.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:38 pm**

Looks like PSU is falling asleep at the wheel. Way to pin 'em deep on that kickoff. Now it's a ballgame.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:39 pm**

PSU's OL has played well. If they stick to using 22 as an RB, they might have something. Playcalling pretty shaky.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:40 pm**

Memo to the Paternos...more points are necessary.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:46 pm**

Well, I'm starting to agree...the sackless playcalling might end up costing PSU this game.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:53 pm**

PSU in trouble now. If we're in a situation where we have to throw, I don't see us succeeding.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:55 pm**

Van wrote:LSU's going to find a way to LSU themselves another win.

Not sure what that means, but it's funny nonetheless.

I know the field condition has been commented on already but seriously this is one of, if not the worst, I've ever seen.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:03 pm**

B10 officials? Have to be - seems like their special grade of incompetence.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:04 pm**

PSUFAN wrote:B10 officials? Have to be - seems like their special grade of incompetence.

Amateurs.

Sin,
PAC10 Refs

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:07 pm**

Boone's a tough kid, but you're right

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:08 pm**

I'm going to miss Bowman, Lee, Odrick, and Quarless.

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:18 pm**

Ride that OL

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:23 pm**

Some tough play from Jones...

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:25 pm**

Earn your scholly, Wagner

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:29 pm**

Kicked it right to him? wtf

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:30 pm**

contain?

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:32 pm**

uh...wtf?

Posted: **Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:38 pm**

I was impressed by Jefferson. He was usually on target, there were some early drops...

Props to Clark for gutting that one out. Hats off to LSU - heck of a contest.

T1B

SECBSHs - step on up

SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up

Re: SECBSHs - step on up