Re: Games Today.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:39 pm
Navy was pretty solid this year.
Yes they were good, but Mizzou has more talent. With so much time to prep Mizzou should've been ready for the option. Plus Navy wasn't bringing much up-front on D, you gotta run at that. Coaching fail.PSUFAN wrote:Navy was pretty solid this year.
HUGE Coaching Fail - We need to find a Mike Anderson in the CFB ranks, someone who can gameplan and get max performance out of the kids, whether they're blue chips or not.Danimal wrote: Coaching fail.
http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... 01#p648001KC Scott wrote:HUGE Coaching Fail - We need to find a Mike Anderson in the CFB ranks, someone who can gameplan and get max performance out of the kids, whether they're blue chips or not.Danimal wrote: Coaching fail.
Pinkle can recruit and that's about it
Agreed - he's turned the corner in Mizzou football, but now we need someone who can take it to the next level.King Crimson wrote:c'mon MU fan. make a list of the winning seasons and bowl games you've had in the 20 years before Pinkel and with GP. he uncorks a stinker on a regular basis but be "realistic" here. :?
KC Scott wrote:Agreed - he's turned the corner in Mizzou football, but now we need someone who can take it to the next level.King Crimson wrote:c'mon MU fan. make a list of the winning seasons and bowl games you've had in the 20 years before Pinkel and with GP. he uncorks a stinker on a regular basis but be "realistic" here. :?
Contrast that with where OU was prior to Snoops / albeit without the tradition 50-70s
heck, OU has 5 top 6 finishes in the 80's. in addition to the MNC in 85. You take Miami off the board and OU wins 3 straight MNC's (OU's only losses in 85,86, and 87 are to Miami). i guess that's not enough for MU fan ( :wink: ). all of it bookended by two "meh" Gibbs years and Switzer's 7-4-1 year in which he really almost got fired. Old oil money and cigar crowd up in the Santee Lounge and Bud's former players were ready to let him go.SunCoastSooner wrote:KC Scott wrote:Agreed - he's turned the corner in Mizzou football, but now we need someone who can take it to the next level.King Crimson wrote:c'mon MU fan. make a list of the winning seasons and bowl games you've had in the 20 years before Pinkel and with GP. he uncorks a stinker on a regular basis but be "realistic" here. :?
Contrast that with where OU was prior to Snoops / albeit without the tradition 50-70s
Yeah because it's not like they didn't win the conference five times in the 80s and a national that decade either... fucking moron.
KC Scott wrote:Gibbs
Schnellenberger
Blake
Feel free to EAD Sooner Fags
i'll pass, but i trust your experience with it.KC Scott wrote: Feel free to EAD Sooner Fags
Dude, once again, you're a fucking moron... Gibbs had a better winning percentage as a head coach than Gary Pinkel has... 66% > 59% and a better winning percentage in bowl games than Stinkel. Gibbs' teams only finished lower than third in the Big 8 once (1992), if not for loses to Colorado in '90 and '91 they would have been conference champs both seasons. He got canned because he couldn't beat Texas and couldn't get over the hump and finish above Nebraska and/or Colorado in conference; were perennial second or tied for second in conference which is unacceptable in Norman but is apparently "having turned the corner" (your words not mine) and perfectly acceptable in Columbia. Even the Gibb's era of OU football outshines Missouri's standards.KC Scott wrote:This was my "before Bob Stoops OU was in the Wildnerness" proof:
Gibbs
Schnellenberger
Blake
Before you ladies got your "We were great in the 80's too" roll on.
My Mea culpa is I said 80's - Should have said late 80s- early 90's before Stoops brought the program back
Sunny Enistein now thinks I'm running competition smack?
How very Vapid of you.
Missouri has virtually never been competitive with OU - and until we get a coach that can take the program beyond Pinkel - we won't be
KC Scott wrote:This was my "before Bob Stoops OU was in the Wildnerness" proof:
Gibbs
Schnellenberger
Blake
Before you ladies got your "We were great in the 80's too" roll on.
My Mea culpa is I said 80's - Should have said late 80s- early 90's before Stoops brought the program back
Sunny Enistein now thinks I'm running competition smack?
How very Vapid of you.
Missouri has virtually never been competitive with OU - and until we get a coach that can take the program beyond Pinkel - we won't be
Once again proving you can't comprehend the written word -you just added detail to the point I madeSunCoastSooner wrote:if not for loses to Colorado in '90 and '91 they would have been conference champs both seasons. He got canned because he couldn't beat Texas and couldn't get over the hump and finish above Nebraska and/or Colorado in conference; were perennial second or tied for second in conference which is unacceptable in Norman.
We were upper echelon for much of the Gibbs era. We were severely limited in scholarships for three of those seasons and not allowed to go to Bowl games for two of them because of probation. How the hell was he supposed to "elevate" a team who had won a national title in the previous five years and played for a chance at in their bowl game two other times. There was no where to go from there but down, especially with probation. One poor season, by Oklahoma standards, did him in. Even the vast majority of his loses were very competitive, only being beaten by more than ten points five times during his tenure, and only one of those loses was a to a team ranked outside the top 10... that one loss was as a lame duck coach where he had already been told he wasn't going to be retained but would be allowed to coach the Copper Bowl. He finished in the top 20 of the country all but two of his seasons. Gibbs also had a lot of big wins during his tenure to include in 1990 #13 Pittsburgh 52-10 and a bitch slapping of #8 ranked Nebraska, in 1991 #12 Virginia 48-14, in 1992 they tied #11 Colorado (who finished the season #4 in the AP poll) in Boulder, in 1993 he bitch slapped #5 Texas A&M (44-14) whose only loses that season were to OU and #2 in the country Notre Dame in the Cotton Bowl. 1994 was his undoing. Revisionist history, mostly propagated by Sooner fans, want to lump him in with Smellsofbourbon and Blake because he led them into those eras after a being dealt a pretty shitty hand.KC Scott wrote:KC Scott wrote:This was my "before Bob Stoops OU was in the Wildnerness" proof:
Gibbs
Schnellenberger
Blake
Before you ladies got your "We were great in the 80's too" roll on.
My Mea culpa is I said 80's - Should have said late 80s- early 90's before Stoops brought the program back
Sunny Enistein now thinks I'm running competition smack?
How very Vapid of you.
Missouri has virtually never been competitive with OU - and until we get a coach that can take the program beyond Pinkel - we won't beOnce again proving you can't comprehend the written word -you just added detail to the point I madeSunCoastSooner wrote:if not for loses to Colorado in '90 and '91 they would have been conference champs both seasons. He got canned because he couldn't beat Texas and couldn't get over the hump and finish above Nebraska and/or Colorado in conference; were perennial second or tied for second in conference which is unacceptable in Norman.
Gibbs was pushed out of Norman for not elevating the program = stoops took them back to the upper echelon
Wanna rant more?
Did you ever think that this is the best your program can do?KC Scott wrote:Missouri has virtually never been competitive with OU - and until we get a coach that can take the program beyond Pinkel - we won't be