Page 1 of 2

mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:33 am
by Katy
I'd like to fuck you until another emotion is created to commemorate the illegal acts I'd like to commit with you.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:35 am
by Van
It's "new emotion," not "new emoticon," you...WHORE!

:lol:

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:36 am
by Katy
Van wrote:It's "new emotion," not "new emoticon," you...WHORE!

:lol:
Oh yeah. Sorry, don't mess with my mojo here. I'm trying to get my slut on.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:21 am
by Wolfman
I'm trying to get my slut on.
Looks like you found the right place.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:39 pm
by War Wagon
What's going on here?

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:11 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
War Wagon wrote:What's going on here?
Image

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:34 pm
by Smackie Chan
War Wagon wrote:What's going on here?
Need to hang out in chat radio to find out. Good times, good times. If chats could be archived, last night's definitely would.

I'll play you some Foghat or Zep or anything else you want, so c'mon in next weekend.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:21 pm
by trev
Yeah, he won't fall for that. But there are other ways, I'm quite sure.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:23 pm
by Van
trev wrote:Meow.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:25 pm
by Van
Moving Sale wrote:..............
Yes, that is the proper place to keep it.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:30 pm
by War Wagon
Smackie Chan wrote:
War Wagon wrote:What's going on here?
Need to hang out in chat radio to find out. Good times, good times. If chats could be archived, last night's definitely would.

I'll play you some Foghat or Zep or anything else you want, so c'mon in next weekend.
Foghat? For realz?

If Katy can be persuaded to perform a virtual pole dance, count me in. Or was that last night and now shit I'm outta' luck?

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:28 pm
by Van
Virtual pole dances? Hell, she blew right past that, going straight to her penchant for swallowing and otherwise taking loads over various portions of her anatomy.

In other words, she was chatting!

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:38 pm
by Smackie Chan
Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches; at one point, the room was evenly divided between dudes and cunts. Pole dancing woulda been a step backward, as Van implied.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:39 pm
by Mikey
Katy's Bukake Hour?

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:44 pm
by Smackie Chan
Mikey wrote:Katy's Bukake Hour?
She was glazed like a Christmas ham.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:17 pm
by War Wagon
Smackie Chan wrote:Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches;
Other bitches?

Now this getting really interesting. Were they like trying to outdo each other competing for the title of raunchiest slut?

I'm sure Katy blew the competition away.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:56 pm
by Smackie Chan
War Wagon wrote:Other bitches?

Now this getting really interesting. Were they like trying to outdo each other competing for the title of raunchiest slut?

I'm sure Katy blew the competition away.
There were 3 or 4 twats in there last night; sometimes others show up. A few don't post here, but just drop in for the chat & music. All are raunchy, but Katy is usually at the top of the leaderboard.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:10 am
by Katy
mvscal wrote:
Katy wrote:I'd like to fuck you until another emotion is created to commemorate the illegal acts I'd like to commit with you.
You're just trying to trick me again. It's not going to work.
I've changed, mvscal. Can you give me one more chance?

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:15 am
by Katy
War Wagon wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches;
Other bitches?

Now this getting really interesting. Were they like trying to outdo each other competing for the title of raunchiest slut?

I'm sure Katy blew the competition away.

You should definitely come by the chats. I blame it on Smackie. It's all his fault.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:16 am
by Katy
Smackie Chan wrote:Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches; at one point, the room was evenly divided between dudes and cunts. Pole dancing woulda been a step backward, as Van implied.

Yeah, the new slunts you brought aboard are very cool. We need to convince them to start posting in this bitch.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:20 am
by Katy
trev wrote:Yeah, he won't fall for that. But there are other ways, I'm quite sure.
Step aside, woman. mvscal's carnal needs are a priority. You're the cotton underwear to my rubber crotchless panties. :P

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:21 am
by eddie munster
"I'm trying to get my slut on"

woaaaa!! pssst pssst hey Katy!!

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:28 am
by fix
Katy wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Katy was being a nasty little slunt in there last night, as were the other bitches; at one point, the room was evenly divided between dudes and cunts. Pole dancing woulda been a step backward, as Van implied.

Yeah, the new slunts you brought aboard are very cool. We need to convince them to start posting in this bitch.
That happens and someone had better page spunkrag to get its ass over and posting on this sordid clam bake.

Pronto..

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:30 am
by trev
Katy wrote:
trev wrote:Yeah, he won't fall for that. But there are other ways, I'm quite sure.
Step aside, woman. mvscal's carnal needs are a priority. You're the cotton underwear to my rubber crotchless panties. :P
You go girl. Whatever you are doing is working. I felt the earth shake in So Cal this afternoon.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:37 am
by Van
Smackie wrote:There were 3 or 4 twats in there last night
:lol:

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:45 am
by Katy
Van wrote:
Smackie wrote:There were 3 or 4 twats in there last night
:lol:

Does Shrubber count for having a twat?

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:48 am
by Smackie Chan
Van wrote:
Smackie wrote:There were 3 or 4 twats in there last night
:lol:
I've found that most women find "twat" to be second only to "cunt" on the offensiveness scale. Of course, the bitches who frequent our little cyberparties aren't like most women. They tend to wear those terms as badges of honor.

Gotta love our little slunts.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:51 am
by Smackie Chan
Katy wrote:Does Shrubber count for having a twat?
I'll be honest, I didn't check his package when we were in NOLA. But I'll go out on a limb and say he doesn't, if for no other reason than to avoid having him creep into thoughts during jerk sessions.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:57 am
by Katy
Smackie Chan wrote:
Katy wrote:Does Shrubber count for having a twat?
I'll be honest, I didn't check his package when we were in NOLA. But I'll go out on a limb and say he doesn't, if for no other reason than to avoid having him creep into thoughts during jerk sessions.
^^^
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Rack.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:16 am
by Van
Smackie, the problem you're doubtless encountering with your use of the term 'cunt' is that you keep applying it to women in general terms, as a rather awkward term of endearment. If you'd just limit it to its proper application, you'd be aces.

All the very best women have and quite enjoy their cunts, up to and including screaming it out in ecstasy.

It's kind of like an endzone celebration.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:24 am
by Smackie Chan
Van wrote:Smackie, the problem you're doubtless encountering with your use of the term 'cunt' is that you keep applying it to women in general terms, as a rather awkward term of endearment.
I go further than that. I also apply it to Sacramento Steve Vai wannabes.

How's that endzone celebration goin'?

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:20 am
by indyfrisco
Lotta disturb going on here.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:28 am
by fix
IndyFrisco wrote:Lotta disturb going on here.
You expected differently from this place?

:lol:

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:30 am
by indyfrisco
Otis wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote:Lotta disturb going on here.
You expected differently from this place?

:lol:
Nope. Just less confirmation.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:39 am
by KC Scott
I foresee a spike in T1B Radio Ratings in the Immediate Future.

Deciders - How can we profit from this?

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:04 am
by fix
KC Scott wrote:I foresee a spike in T1B Radio Ratings in the Immediate Future.

Deciders - How can we profit from this?
More of last night repeated.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 5:18 am
by Katy
mvscal, what sexual favor do I have to perform to get you in chat one night?

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:54 am
by OCmike
I think an enthusiastic rusty trombone should do the trick.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:52 am
by Moving Sale
Katy wrote:mvscal, what sexual favor do I have to perform to get you in chat one night?
He likes black cock.

Re: mvscal

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:30 am
by Katy
Moving Sale wrote:
Katy wrote:mvscal, what sexual favor do I have to perform to get you in chat one night?
He likes black cock.
I know I probably should be embarrassed for starting this thread. But right now I'm more embarrassed for you.

Is that wrong?