In honor of Sammy
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:14 am
FIFYM Club wrote:bama would dick suck them both.
[John Cleese]Your not fooling anyone ya know.[/John Cleese]M Club wrote:i wouldn't go so far as mgo by telling my man to eat a lead sando, but i'm not above telling him to dick suck me.
It wouldn't be a sports forum without at lease one homo or prison joke.M Club wrote:i suppose so, as long as someone was around to make a homo joke.
He's probably satanic like the rest of you shortwhorns... http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20 ... _satan.htmPrimeX wrote:Boise State fan throwing a Hook 'Em sign?
It's sort of a joke from last night. Wags made him a promise that I swore not to uphold.Mr T wrote:So suncoast is the new mTool?
As long as this doesnt become habit, thats coolSunCoastSooner wrote:It's sort of a joke from last night. Wags made him a promise that I swore not to uphold.Mr T wrote:So suncoast is the new mTool?
See looks a lot like the girl that was forced to go to the dance with Napoleon because he drew a picture of her.PrimeX wrote:That chick in the top picture, sooo boner worthy.
And Sam is now strangely absent. Bummer.SunCoastSooner wrote: It's sort of a joke from last night. Wags made him a promise that I swore not to uphold.
You know I am sick of this... I really would like an explanation as to why everyone on this board likes to knock OUfan for getting "blownout" in all their Title games but is lauding Texas for basically playing bama "even" when they lost by more points than two of the three Oklahoma title games and gained fewer offensive yards as well. Everyone is giving Texass a free pass because Colt McCoy got hurt but nobody gave OUfan or Sam a free pass last year when Oklahoma was missing the nation's #2 all purpose yards gainer or Alabama was missing a future top 10 draft pick on the Oline. Nobody gave Oklahoma a free pass from "blowout status" when Oklahoma lost to LSU by a gawd damned Touchdown playing a QB who had a gawd damned broken wrist and had a chance to tie it up with under five minutes to play. WTF people.Van wrote:Felix, considering Texas played Bama basically even, that sorta makes no sense. Texas was every bit as big, fast and mean as Bama, so if you could play with Texas, why couldn't you also play with Bama?
Blow me Sam. I'd like a true to G-d football explanation for this...Papa Willie wrote:SunCoastSooner wrote:You know I am sick of this... I really would like an explanation as to why everyone on this board likes to knock OUfan for getting "blownout" in all their Title games but is lauding Texas for basically playing bama "even" when they lost by more points than two of the three Oklahoma title games and gained fewer offensive yards as well. Everyone is giving Texass a free pass because Colt McCoy got hurt but nobody gave OUfan or Sam a free pass last year when Oklahoma was missing the nation's #2 all purpose yards gainer or Alabama was missing a future top 10 draft pick on the Oline. Nobody gave Oklahoma a free pass from "blowout status" when Oklahoma lost to LSU by a gawd damned Touchdown playing a QB who had a gawd damned broken wrist and had a chance to tie it up with under five minutes to play. WTF people.Van wrote:Felix, considering Texas played Bama basically even, that sorta makes no sense. Texas was every bit as big, fast and mean as Bama, so if you could play with Texas, why couldn't you also play with Bama?
Probably because OU fans bitch and moan more. So far, all the Texas fans have been pretty damned cool. Don't hate me for saying that, but it's true. :D
Papa Willie wrote: I'll go on record NOW. BSU has 22 of 23 coming back? Fuck. They deserve their shot next year. If they go to Blacksburg and beat Va Tech (who is supposedly going to be ranked in the Top 5 this coming season starting off)
Sudden Sam wrote:WTF?!?!SunCoastSooner wrote:
Blow me Sam. I'd like a true to G-d football explanation for this...
Somethings I noticed just going down the list...Dinsdale wrote:Papa Willie wrote: I'll go on record NOW. BSU has 22 of 23 coming back? Fuck. They deserve their shot next year. If they go to Blacksburg and beat Va Tech (who is supposedly going to be ranked in the Top 5 this coming season starting off)
http://www.nationalchamps.net/2010/earlybird/index.htm
First, anyone here buying any validity of a 2010 preseason poll?
Yeah, didn't think so.
But FWIW (absolutely nothing), VT is at #18.
2010 Early Bird
Top 25 Preview
1. Alabama
2. Boise State
3. Oregon
4. Florida
5. Ohio State
6. TCU
7. Texas
8. Georgia Tech
9. Iowa
10. Miami FL
11. Penn State
12. Nebraska
13. Southern California
14. Cincinnati
15. North Carolina
16. Oklahoma
17. Oregon State
18. Virginia Tech
19. West Virginia
20. Houston
21. Louisiana State
22. Wisconsin
23. Georgia
24. Arkansas
25. Missouri
Although, this season once again demonstrated the importance of preseason polls, since it's hard to leapfrog the early favorites.
My Ducks get very favorable starting position (depending on the "real" preseason polls), but they still need to seal the deal.
Of the 2-deep 44, Oregon loses 5, including the backup QB who played one game (in order to keep Derron Thomas' redshirt intact).
Bama is right where they belong. I can probably agree with BSU's spot, as well.
Ummmm Our replacement for Bradford was a freshman as well. Our replacement for Murray (the nation's #2 all purpose yard rusher) last year is a wide receiver... Florida was only up on Oklahoma by three points with 3 minutes left in the game last season as well... nobody was/is calling their last TD a "cheese dick" score. Oklahoma had held Florida to its lowest point total of the season and its closest margin of victory other than the loss as well (including the SEC title game). Sounds more like to me that nobody wants to hold Texas to the same standards they have been holding Oklahoma to, simply because they have played in the game more often...Van wrote:SCS, I know you watched the game last night. The game was basically even. Bame got fourteen points from turnovers from a backup, freshman QB, and they added another cheese dick six there at the end when the game was over, just for the fuck of it. The total yards were basically equal, and Texas played without McCoy. Texas losing McCoy is not the same as OU losing a running back or Bama losing a left tackle. It's the same as OU losing Bradford. Since McCoy was a four year starter, and his backup was a true freshman, it was probably even worse for Texas to lose McCoy than it was for OU to lose Bradford.
There is no fucking way on earth you could look at last night's game and consider it to be a legitimate blowout of Texas. No way.
Van wrote:SCS, you seem to want to overlook the fact that Texas also held Bama to about 250 total yards. Had McCoy played, Texas may have very well been up 14-0, right off the bat. Those two quick brainfarts by Bama to start the game likely result in more than a mere six points, if McCoy's in there. The guy went down on the first drive of the game. That's the single worst thing possible for an offense. His backup got no meaningful practice reps leading up to the game.
I'm not saying OU got torched in all their title game losses, either. Maybe some people say that, but I'm not one of them. I am saying though that Texas most definitely did not get blown out last night. That final sixteen point deficit was in no way, shape or form indicative of how the game really went.
Sudden Sam wrote:Nice.Snake wrote: I seen this on a Bama board. It's a quote from one of their more astute fans....................
Sudden Sam wrote:Got a lot of kids with uber-talent to plug in, but Bama loses a lot on defense.
yeah, well I'm in a "not making much fucking sense" mood todayVan wrote:Felix, considering Texas played Bama basically even, that sorta makes no sense. Texas was every bit as big, fast and mean as Bama, so if you could play with Texas, why couldn't you also play with Bama?
SunCoastSooner wrote:Sudden Sam wrote:WTF?!?!SunCoastSooner wrote:
Blow me Sam. I'd like a true to G-d football explanation for this...
I was posting something else at the same time with another tab open.
Somethings I noticed just going down the list...Dinsdale wrote:Papa Willie wrote: I'll go on record NOW. BSU has 22 of 23 coming back? Fuck. They deserve their shot next year. If they go to Blacksburg and beat Va Tech (who is supposedly going to be ranked in the Top 5 this coming season starting off)
http://www.nationalchamps.net/2010/earlybird/index.htm
First, anyone here buying any validity of a 2010 preseason poll?
Yeah, didn't think so.
But FWIW (absolutely nothing), VT is at #18.
2010 Early Bird
Top 25 Preview
1. Alabama
2. Boise State
3. Oregon
4. Florida
5. Ohio State
6. TCU
7. Texas
8. Georgia Tech
9. Iowa
10. Miami FL
11. Penn State
12. Nebraska
13. Southern California
14. Cincinnati
15. North Carolina
16. Oklahoma
17. Oregon State
18. Virginia Tech
19. West Virginia
20. Houston
21. Louisiana State
22. Wisconsin
23. Georgia
24. Arkansas
25. Missouri
Although, this season once again demonstrated the importance of preseason polls, since it's hard to leapfrog the early favorites.
My Ducks get very favorable starting position (depending on the "real" preseason polls), but they still need to seal the deal.
Of the 2-deep 44, Oregon loses 5, including the backup QB who played one game (in order to keep Derron Thomas' redshirt intact).
Bama is right where they belong. I can probably agree with BSU's spot, as well.
Bama #1 preseason losing a shit ton on defense, two key Olineman, and one of their top receivers? That seems a bit much. There almost certainly has to be a drop off losing that much and that's provided nobody leaves early as well.
Florida #4... another team who is losing a shit ton on defense as well as Teblow.
Texas #7... Loses McCoy and Shipley who take their homoerotic pad sharing to the NFL to wash out. Hall and "A Hold on every down" Utalowski are gone off the Oline. Also lose at least three players on defense I can think of off the top of my head including The Great Drunken man who gets attacked by walls in the offseason.
Nebraska at #12 despite it going to be losing its two best players on Defense which carried them? Maybe they can pull that out but not if their offense doesn't improve drastically to take up some slack.
Cincy #14 despite losing its coach and its best players leaving and graduating?
I don't hate you for saying that. I hate you because you're about as useful as a bag of f*ggots.Papa Willie wrote:SunCoastSooner wrote:You know I am sick of this... I really would like an explanation as to why everyone on this board likes to knock OUfan for getting "blownout" in all their Title games but is lauding Texas for basically playing bama "even" when they lost by more points than two of the three Oklahoma title games and gained fewer offensive yards as well. Everyone is giving Texass a free pass because Colt McCoy got hurt but nobody gave OUfan or Sam a free pass last year when Oklahoma was missing the nation's #2 all purpose yards gainer or Alabama was missing a future top 10 draft pick on the Oline. Nobody gave Oklahoma a free pass from "blowout status" when Oklahoma lost to LSU by a gawd damned Touchdown playing a QB who had a gawd damned broken wrist and had a chance to tie it up with under five minutes to play. WTF people.Van wrote:Felix, considering Texas played Bama basically even, that sorta makes no sense. Texas was every bit as big, fast and mean as Bama, so if you could play with Texas, why couldn't you also play with Bama?
Probably because OU fans bitch and moan more. So far, all the Texas fans have been pretty damned cool. Don't hate me for saying that, but it's true. :D