T1B

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:38 am**

I'm going to go out on a limb and
assume he's a strict constitutionalist.

IN

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 9:52 am**

^^^^^^^^^^
...because air is free.

She would be the third Jewish justice along with six Catholics.

Representative democracy.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 11:38 am**

Martyred wrote:She would be the third Jewish justice along with six Catholics.

Representative democracy.

Among the legal profession? That sounds about right.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 12:01 pm**

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Among the legal profession? That sounds about right.

Your not making a very good argument against the charge that the legal system and the judiciary in general is developing into a caste unto itself.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 12:37 pm**

"It's just that the WASP's may not have
some of the necessities to be, let's say,
a judge, or a supreme court justice."

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 1:50 pm**

Martyred wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Among the legal profession? That sounds about right.
Your not making a very good argument against the charge that the legal system and the judiciary in general is developing into a caste unto itself.

Back to your original point, the Supreme Court never was intended to be an example of representative democracy. And it wasn't all that long ago that there was a "Catholic seat" on the Supreme Court, or that it was big news when a Jew was nominated for the Supreme Court. In that respect, the Court has come a long way.

Btw, Long Dong Silver is no longer Catholic, IIRC.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 2:12 pm**

I'd like to have her nose full of nickels.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 2:49 pm**

Someone on the left is not that happy with the choice.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 2:57 pm**

Racism by Association.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:02 pm**

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Back to your original point, the Supreme Court never was intended to be an example of representative democracy.

Save your de jure counterpoint. How about inspiring confidence in the citizenry?
Or are you so rigid that you can't conceive of a government "by the people"?

No wonder folks fucking hate lawyers. Jefferson must be choking on his own bile at the thought of you brahmins.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:02 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:Someone on the left is not that happy with the choice.

I thought you were going to link to an article from someone on the "left"?

Still waiting...

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:03 pm**

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Martyred wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Among the legal profession? That sounds about right.
Your not making a very good argument against the charge that the legal system and the judiciary in general is developing into a caste unto itself.
Back to your original point, the Supreme Court never was intended to be an example of representative democracy. And it wasn't all that long ago that there was a "Catholic seat" on the Supreme Court, or that it was big news when a Jew was nominated for the Supreme Court. In that respect, the Court has come a long way.

Btw, Long Dong Silver is no longer Catholic, IIRC.

We don't allow his kind in the One True Church.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:04 pm**

Mikey wrote:

We don't allow his kind in the One True Church.

Why? Is he heterosexual? Only like other adults?

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:06 pm**

Martyred wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Back to your original point, the Supreme Court never was intended to be an example of representative democracy.
Save your de jure counterpoint. How about inspiring confidence in the citizenry?
Or are you so rigid that you can't conceive of a government "by the people"?

No wonder folks fucking hate lawyers. Jefferson must be choking on his own bile at the thought of you brahmins.

Jefferson is dead, though his great great great grandson is still with us.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:17 pm**

Do you plan on movin' on up, to the east side?

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:18 pm**

Damn you Mikey, for blunting my vitriol! Damn you...and your raccoon too.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:24 pm**

Sorry, I just can't abide by all this vitriol. Blunting is my only option.

After all, we're all Jim Rome and friends, aren't we?

And I can't even see my own raccoon right now. Photobucket is blocked by our virtual big brother here.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 3:55 pm**

Martyred wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Someone on the left is not that happy with the choice.
I thought you were going to link to an article from someone on the "left"?

Still waiting...

I don’t believe you know your left from your right. Or right from wrong, for that matter.

Nice use of the m2 "quote" thingys, BTW.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 5:49 pm**

poptart wrote:

"It's just that the WASP's may not have
some of the necessities to be, let's say,
a judge, or a supreme court justice."

Pretty much.

That being said, as an atheist, I'm not crying about my lack of representation on the court, so why should you? Besides, WASP in Chief W had two chances to throw you a bone and didn't, so don't blame Barry. And since the last WASP on the Court was part of the liberal wing, you shouldn't feel too bad.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 6:07 pm**

Unless she is ready to overturn Wickard she's a fucking hack.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 7:14 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:
I don’t believe you know your left from your right. Or right from wrong, for that matter.

Two flavours of vanilla says what?

There is no vocal "left" in America. Don't even try.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 7:32 pm**

Martyred wrote: There is no vocal "left" in America. Don't even try.

They don't get much more vocal than BSmack.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 7:47 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:
Martyred wrote: There is no vocal "left" in America. Don't even try.
They don't get much more vocal than BSmack.

You've got to be kidding? Mr. Middle Class Values?

He fake-talked a little ACORN-speak until Soetero won, then it was all "Hey, I got mine...see ya' suckers..."

Right....

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 7:53 pm**

The only American on this board that even approaches "leftism" would be Wags.

Sometimes his posts read like long lost chapters of "The Grapes Of Wrath".
He'd never admit it though, his roots are in Old Democrat, labour movement, Woody Guthrie-esque share cropper rebellion.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 7:59 pm**

Yes, you're a fucking Communist. We get it.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 8:02 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:Yes, you're a fucking Communist. We get it.

Technically, I'm a "small a" anarchist.

You might wanna bring this up with Phibes.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 8:05 pm**

Did you just misspell "antichrist"? Dinsdale want to know.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 8:22 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:Did you just misspell "antichrist"? Dinsdale want to know.

I am completely non-committal on Proposition Dins. I do however, plan on releasing a position paper to clear the matter up.
Gotta run it by my staffers first.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 8:31 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:"antichrist"?

ELIMINATED

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 8:35 pm**

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 8:36 pm**

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:"antichrist"?
ELIMINATED

Oh, Screwey...

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 8:38 pm**

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm**

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:"antichrist"?
ELIMINATED

Uhm... that's actually a word, Mr. "Journalist."

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm**

Truman wrote:

I think comparing her picture to another picture of her face would be more insulting.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 9:03 pm**

Punctuation goes INSIDE quotations, dumbfucks.

You're all ELIMINATED.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 9:12 pm**

http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/quotes.asp

See Rule 2. Idiot.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 9:21 pm**

Without even looking at the link...

Periods and commas always go inside the quotes.

Question marks go inside the quotes if the quote is a question, outside if the quote is part of a question.

Your attainment of this so-called "journalism degree" wasn't preceded by the words "a suprise in every box" by any chance?

How are those geysers treating you these days"?"

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 9:22 pm**

I stand corrected, shitstain.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 9:24 pm**

You should just make that part of every post you punch out. It would save a shit load of time.

Posted: **Mon May 10, 2010 9:25 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/quotes.asp

See Rule 2. Idiot.

BTW -- it only took me 5+ years to hammer Rule #1 into this board's collective skull...

Yet I still see it fucked up daily. Maybe I just paid more attention in 3rd fucking grade than most.

T1B

Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!

Re: Barry nominates Alan Kagan!