Page 1 of 1
Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 9:00 pm
by The Seer
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 1:47 pm
by indyfrisco
Seriously, was this shitty excuse doled out in some alumni newsletter for all $CFan to use?
Expand » Guest Nathan G 2 days ago
3 people liked this.
Totally unfair comparison. Big difference from getting money from a booster and getting money from a wanna be agent who is paying you in hopes of getting you to leave the school. That's what makes this issue so complicated is at what point do you stop holding the school responsible. USC had absolutely nothing to do with the money Bush got. In fact, the money actually hurt USC because they would've loved to had him come back for his senior year.
You're clearly just a sad little Trojan hater. If you're going to punish schools if their players receive any benefits from agents or would-be-agents, then I'd be willing to bet the farm that you'd have to punish every single school that has ever had a first round draft pick. These athletes are worth millions and everyone knows it and wants a piece.
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 2:42 pm
by M Club
i didn't even bother clicking on seer's link. figured not much worthwhile in there if van hadn't even bothered to dig up some ancient supreme court ruling to post only after replacing every mention of the aggrieved party with "usc."
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 3:26 pm
by Van
Now that you mention it, that would be a solid strategy.
:doh:
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 3:53 pm
by Goober McTuber
M Club wrote:i didn't even bother clicking on seer's link. figured not much worthwhile in there if van hadn't even bothered to dig up some ancient supreme court ruling to post only after replacing every mention of the aggrieved party with "usc."
I didn't bother clicking on the Seer's link because, well, it was posted by the Seer (a misnomer if there ever was one).
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:39 pm
by The Seer
Goober McTuber wrote:
I didn't bother clicking on the Seer's link because, well, it was posted by the Seer (a misnomer if there ever was one).
10,570 posts....you have no life, so you should click on just about ANYTHING - in hopes that you get your meaningless life distracted if just for a minute or two....
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 9:06 pm
by Goober McTuber
The Seer wrote:Goober McTuber wrote:
I didn't bother clicking on the Seer's link because, well, it was posted by the Seer (a misnomer if there ever was one).
10,570 posts....you have no life, so you should click on just about ANYTHING - in hopes that you get your meaningless life distracted if just for a minute or two....
Post total smack, followed by "you have no life." Right out of the tards.net handbook. Yes, you only have 3,500 posts, and they all suck. Rack your consistency.
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 9:18 pm
by The Seer
Goober McTuber wrote:The Seer wrote:Goober McTuber wrote:
I didn't bother clicking on the Seer's link because, well, it was posted by the Seer (a misnomer if there ever was one).
10,570 posts....you have no life, so you should click on just about ANYTHING - in hopes that you get your meaningless life distracted if just for a minute or two....
Post total smack, followed by "you have no life." Right out of the tards.net handbook. Yes, you only have 3,500 posts, and they all suck. Rack your consistency.
Flattered that you've read all my "3500" posts....nice gesture making my case for me...but then again, I was trying to help so you did owe me....speaking of tards.net, can you come back with something dynamic again - like "your posts suck" - you know, something never seen before that requires thought...then again, you might be too busy
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 12:00 pm
by Goober McTuber
Read all of your posts? Not a chance. I didn’t have to hear MGMT’s entire discography to know that they blow goats. What exactly was your “case”?
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Tue May 25, 2010 10:38 pm
by The Seer
Goober McTuber wrote:Read all of your posts? Not a chance. I didn’t have to hear MGMT’s entire discography to know that they blow goats. What exactly was your “case”?
So, to summarize this dialogue, you just decided to drive-by and throw out some worn-out smack calling me out for having takes that suck; takes that you haven't read...and you want this "thing" to go on and on....whatever....keep on (not) reading my takes and maybe eventually you won't feel compelled to (contribute) on a thread that didn't prompt your participation to begin with....and for parliamentary procedure's sake I will summarily include on my departure from this thread that your takes, (also unread) have equal suckage...
If necessary, I'll include a "I know you are but what am I" response if you need to spam on....
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 2:20 pm
by Goober McTuber
Actually, I initially cracked on your link (without clicking on it, yes). A minor point, to be sure, but I never cracked on your “takes” until you started in with your awesome post total and no-life-having call-out. BTW, do you buy ellipses by the carton at Costco, or what?
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 3:51 pm
by The Seer
Ellipses are the latest rage - due to their versatile affect in both emphasis and ambiguity and as yet to catch on here; so (yes), I am a trend setter.
Too bad all this adds to my post count total....
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 4:01 pm
by Goober McTuber
Well, Mr. trend setter, you're using them incorrectly (shocker) but I'll leave that for Dinsdale to explain to you.
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 7:13 pm
by Killian
Goober McTuber wrote:Actually, I initially cracked on your link (without clicking on it, yes).
You cracked on the link by cracking on him.
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 7:35 pm
by Goober McTuber
Killian wrote:Goober McTuber wrote:Actually, I initially cracked on your link (without clicking on it, yes).
You cracked on the link by cracking on him.
I initially cracked on him, not his "takes". That was the point, however trivial. How much further you think we should nit-pick this? I'm free until 4.
Re: Nice piece on SuC/NCAA by (a) PSUFAN
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 9:35 pm
by The Seer
Killian wrote:
You cracked on the link by cracking on him.
2 cracks and no click(?)